Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yongchen Yang <yoyang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: bypass may_create_in_sticky check if task has CAP_FOWNER
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:37:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220727123710.tzg44xojlc3pmsiw@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220727123048.46389-1-jlayton@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 08:30:48AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> NFS server is exporting a sticky directory (mode 01777) with root
> squashing enabled. Client has protect_regular enabled and then tries to
> open a file as root in that directory. File is created (with ownership
> set to nobody:nobody) but the open syscall returns an error.
> 
> The problem is may_create_in_sticky, which rejects the open even though
> the file has already been created/opened. Bypass the checks in
> may_create_in_sticky if the task has CAP_FOWNER in the given namespace.
> 
> Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976829
> Reported-by: Yongchen Yang <yoyang@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/namei.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 1f28d3f463c3..170c2396ba29 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -1230,7 +1230,8 @@ static int may_create_in_sticky(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>  	    (!sysctl_protected_regular && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) ||
>  	    likely(!(dir_mode & S_ISVTX)) ||
>  	    uid_eq(i_uid_into_mnt(mnt_userns, inode), dir_uid) ||
> -	    uid_eq(current_fsuid(), i_uid_into_mnt(mnt_userns, inode)))
> +	    uid_eq(current_fsuid(), i_uid_into_mnt(mnt_userns, inode)) ||
> +	    ns_capable(mnt_userns, CAP_FOWNER))
>  		return 0;

Hm, no. You really want inode_owner_or_capable() here..
You need to verify that you have a mapping for the inode->i_{g,u}id in
question and that you're having CAP_FOWNER in the caller's userns.

I'm pretty sure we should also restrict this to the case were the caller
actually created the file otherwise we introduce a potential issue where
the caller is susceptible to data spoofing. For example, the file was
created by another user racing the caller's O_CREAT.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27 12:30 [PATCH] vfs: bypass may_create_in_sticky check if task has CAP_FOWNER Jeff Layton
2022-07-27 12:37 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-07-27 12:55   ` Jeff Layton
2022-07-27 13:16     ` Christian Brauner
2022-07-27 13:29       ` Jeff Layton
2022-07-27 13:36         ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220727123710.tzg44xojlc3pmsiw@wittgenstein \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yoyang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox