Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com
Cc: willy@infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] nfsd: write verifier fixes and optimization
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:13:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230213211345.385005-1-jlayton@kernel.org> (raw)

While looking at the recent problems with the fsync during nfsd_file
cleanup, it occured to me that we could greatly simplify and improve
the server's write verifier handling. I also noticed an existing bug
which is fixed in patch #1.

Instead of trying to check for errors via fsync and resetting the write
verifier when we get one, we can just fold the current value of the
inode's errseq_t into the hashed verifier that is generated at startup
time.

Testing this new scheme has been a real challenge. Once a writeback
error is recorded on all local filesystems, further attempts to write to
the inode return -EIO (and some filesystems even flip to r/o) and you
never see the new verifier.

Trond, you originally added the code to make it reset the verifier on a
writeback error. Do you have a good way to test that? Did you guys use
NFSv3 reexport for testing this somehow?

Jeff Layton (3):
  nfsd: copy the whole verifier in nfsd_copy_write_verifier
  errseq: add a new errseq_fetch helper
  nfsd: simplify write verifier handling

 fs/nfsd/filecache.c    | 22 +------------------
 fs/nfsd/netns.h        |  4 ----
 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c     | 17 ++++++---------
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c       |  1 -
 fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c       | 48 +++++++++++++-----------------------------
 fs/nfsd/trace.h        | 28 ------------------------
 fs/nfsd/vfs.c          | 28 +++++-------------------
 fs/nfsd/vfs.h          |  1 +
 include/linux/errseq.h |  1 +
 lib/errseq.c           | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 10 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-02-13 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-13 21:13 Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-02-13 21:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfsd: copy the whole verifier in nfsd_copy_write_verifier Jeff Layton
2023-02-13 21:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] errseq: add a new errseq_fetch helper Jeff Layton
2023-02-13 21:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfsd: simplify write verifier handling Jeff Layton
2023-02-14  0:49   ` Rick Macklem
2023-02-14  3:28     ` Trond Myklebust
2023-02-14 13:53       ` Jeff Layton
2023-02-14 14:58         ` Chuck Lever III
2023-02-14 15:01           ` Jeff Layton
2023-02-14 22:57         ` Rick Macklem
2023-02-14 23:16           ` Jeff Layton
2023-02-14 23:34           ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230213211345.385005-1-jlayton@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox