From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: Boyang Xue <bxue@redhat.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] nfsd: remove unsafe BUG_ON from set_change_info
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 14:23:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230720-bz2223560-v2-2-070aaf2660b7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230720-bz2223560-v2-0-070aaf2660b7@kernel.org>
At one time, nfsd would scrape inode information directly out of struct
inode in order to populate the change_info4. At that time, the BUG_ON in
set_change_info made some sense, since having it unset meant a coding
error.
More recently, it calls vfs_getattr to get this information, which can
fail. If that fails, fh_pre_saved can end up not being set. While this
situation is unfortunate, we don't need to crash the box.
Move set_change_info to nfs4proc.c since all of the callers are there.
Revise the condition for setting "atomic" to also check for
fh_pre_saved, and rework the rest to try and handle either flag being
missing when this occurs.
Reported-by: Boyang Xue <bxue@redhat.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223560
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/nfsd/xdr4.h | 11 -----------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index 9285e1eab4d5..4467be7d9c2a 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -382,6 +382,37 @@ nfsd4_create_file(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp,
return status;
}
+/**
+ * set_change_info - set up the change_info4 for a reply
+ * @cinfo: pointer to nfsd4_change_info to be populated
+ * @fhp: pointer to svc_fh to use as source
+ *
+ * Many operations in NFSv4 require change_info4 in the reply. This function
+ * populates that from the info that we (should!) have already collected. In
+ * the event that we didn't get any pre-attrs, just zero out both.
+ */
+static void
+set_change_info(struct nfsd4_change_info *cinfo, struct svc_fh *fhp)
+{
+ cinfo->atomic = (u32)(fhp->fh_pre_saved && fhp->fh_post_saved && !fhp->fh_no_atomic_attr);
+ cinfo->before_change = fhp->fh_pre_change;
+ cinfo->after_change = fhp->fh_post_change;
+
+ /*
+ * If fetching the pre-change attributes failed, then we should
+ * have already failed the whole operation. We could have still
+ * failed to fetch post-change attributes however.
+ *
+ * The pre field should be set at this point. WARN if it's
+ * that's ever not the case. If either value is unset, then just
+ * zero out the field since we don't have any other recourse.
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fhp->fh_pre_saved))
+ cinfo->before_change = 0;
+ if (!fhp->fh_post_saved)
+ cinfo->after_change = 0;
+}
+
static __be32
do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct nfsd4_open *open, struct svc_fh **resfh)
{
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h b/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
index b2931fdf53be..9e67f63c5f4d 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/xdr4.h
@@ -775,17 +775,6 @@ void warn_on_nonidempotent_op(struct nfsd4_op *op);
#define NFS4_SVC_XDRSIZE sizeof(struct nfsd4_compoundargs)
-static inline void
-set_change_info(struct nfsd4_change_info *cinfo, struct svc_fh *fhp)
-{
- BUG_ON(!fhp->fh_pre_saved);
- cinfo->atomic = (u32)(fhp->fh_post_saved && !fhp->fh_no_atomic_attr);
-
- cinfo->before_change = fhp->fh_pre_change;
- cinfo->after_change = fhp->fh_post_change;
-}
-
-
bool nfsd4_mach_creds_match(struct nfs4_client *cl, struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
bool nfs4svc_decode_compoundargs(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct xdr_stream *xdr);
bool nfs4svc_encode_compoundres(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct xdr_stream *xdr);
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 18:23 [PATCH v2 0/2] nfsd: sanely handle inabilty to fetch pre/post attributes Jeff Layton
2023-07-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nfsd: handle failure to collect pre/post-op attrs more sanely Jeff Layton
2023-07-20 21:46 ` NeilBrown
2023-07-20 23:09 ` Chuck Lever
2023-07-21 12:17 ` Jeff Layton
2023-07-20 18:23 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-07-20 21:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] nfsd: sanely handle inabilty to fetch pre/post attributes NeilBrown
2023-07-20 23:15 ` Chuck Lever
2023-07-21 12:48 ` Jeff Layton
2023-07-22 0:34 ` NeilBrown
2023-07-24 10:36 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230720-bz2223560-v2-2-070aaf2660b7@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=bxue@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).