From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: chuck.lever@oracle.com
Cc: jlayton@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, kolga@netapp.com,
Dai.Ngo@oracle.com, tom@talpey.com,
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna@kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, teigland@redhat.com,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, aahringo@redhat.com,
agruenba@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC v6.5-rc2 3/3] fs: lockd: introduce safe async lock op
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:58:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230720125806.1385279-3-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230720125806.1385279-1-aahringo@redhat.com>
This patch reverts mostly commit 40595cdc93ed ("nfs: block notification
on fs with its own ->lock") and introduces an EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK
export flag to signal that the "own ->lock" implementation supports
async lock requests. The only main user is DLM that is used by GFS2 and
OCFS2 filesystem. Those implement their own lock() implementation and
return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED as return value. Since commit 40595cdc93ed
("nfs: block notification on fs with its own ->lock") the DLM
implementation were never updated. This patch should prepare for DLM
to set the EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK export flag and update the DLM
plock implementation regarding to it.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/lockd/svclock.c | 5 ++---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 11 ++++++++---
include/linux/exportfs.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index 62ef27a69a9e..54a67bd33843 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -483,9 +483,7 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_lock *lock, int wait,
struct nlm_cookie *cookie, int reclaim)
{
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG)
struct inode *inode = nlmsvc_file_inode(file);
-#endif
struct nlm_block *block = NULL;
int error;
int mode;
@@ -499,7 +497,8 @@ nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
(long long)lock->fl.fl_end,
wait);
- if (nlmsvc_file_file(file)->f_op->lock) {
+ if (!(inode->i_sb->s_export_op->flags & EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK) &&
+ nlmsvc_file_file(file)->f_op->lock) {
async_block = wait;
wait = 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 6e61fa3acaf1..efcea229d640 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -7432,6 +7432,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl = NULL;
struct file_lock *file_lock = NULL;
struct file_lock *conflock = NULL;
+ struct super_block *sb;
__be32 status = 0;
int lkflg;
int err;
@@ -7453,6 +7454,7 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
dprintk("NFSD: nfsd4_lock: permission denied!\n");
return status;
}
+ sb = cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry->d_sb;
if (lock->lk_is_new) {
if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
@@ -7504,7 +7506,8 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
fp = lock_stp->st_stid.sc_file;
switch (lock->lk_type) {
case NFS4_READW_LT:
- if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
+ if (sb->s_export_op->flags & EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK &&
+ nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
fallthrough;
case NFS4_READ_LT:
@@ -7516,7 +7519,8 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
fl_type = F_RDLCK;
break;
case NFS4_WRITEW_LT:
- if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
+ if (sb->s_export_op->flags & EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK &&
+ nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
fl_flags |= FL_SLEEP;
fallthrough;
case NFS4_WRITE_LT:
@@ -7544,7 +7548,8 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
* for file locks), so don't attempt blocking lock notifications
* on those filesystems:
*/
- if (nf->nf_file->f_op->lock)
+ if (!(sb->s_export_op->flags & EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK) &&
+ nf->nf_file->f_op->lock)
fl_flags &= ~FL_SLEEP;
nbl = find_or_allocate_block(lock_sop, &fp->fi_fhandle, nn);
diff --git a/include/linux/exportfs.h b/include/linux/exportfs.h
index 11fbd0ee1370..da742abbaf3e 100644
--- a/include/linux/exportfs.h
+++ b/include/linux/exportfs.h
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ struct export_operations {
atomic attribute updates
*/
#define EXPORT_OP_FLUSH_ON_CLOSE (0x20) /* fs flushes file data on close */
+#define EXPORT_OP_SAFE_ASYNC_LOCK (0x40) /* fs can do async lock request */
unsigned long flags;
};
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-20 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 12:58 [RFC v6.5-rc2 1/3] fs: lockd: nlm_blocked list race fixes Alexander Aring
2023-07-20 12:58 ` [RFC v6.5-rc2 2/3] fs: lockd: fix race in async lock request handling Alexander Aring
2023-07-21 13:09 ` Alexander Aring
2023-07-21 16:43 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-10 21:00 ` Alexander Aring
2023-07-21 15:45 ` Jeff Layton
2023-08-10 20:37 ` Alexander Aring
2023-07-20 12:58 ` Alexander Aring [this message]
2023-07-21 17:46 ` [RFC v6.5-rc2 3/3] fs: lockd: introduce safe async lock op Jeff Layton
2023-08-10 20:24 ` Alexander Aring
2023-07-21 15:14 ` [RFC v6.5-rc2 1/3] fs: lockd: nlm_blocked list race fixes Jeff Layton
2023-07-21 16:59 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230720125806.1385279-3-aahringo@redhat.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).