From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] SUNRPC: add list of idle threads
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 11:54:18 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230815015426.5091-3-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815015426.5091-1-neilb@suse.de>
Rather than searching a list of threads to find an idle one, having a
list of idle threads allows an idle thread to be found immediately.
This adds some spin_lock calls which is not ideal, but as the hold-time
is tiny it is still faster than searching a list. A future patch will
remove them using llist.h. This involves some subtlety and so is left
to a separate patch.
This removes the need for the RQ_BUSY flag. The rqst is "busy"
precisely when it is not on the "idle" list.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/trace/events/sunrpc.h | 1 -
net/sunrpc/svc.c | 14 +++++++++-----
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 15 +++++++++++----
4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
index 0ec691070e27..e9c34e99bc88 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct svc_pool {
struct list_head sp_sockets; /* pending sockets */
unsigned int sp_nrthreads; /* # of threads in pool */
struct list_head sp_all_threads; /* all server threads */
+ struct list_head sp_idle_threads; /* idle server threads */
/* statistics on pool operation */
struct percpu_counter sp_messages_arrived;
@@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
*/
struct svc_rqst {
struct list_head rq_all; /* all threads list */
+ struct list_head rq_idle; /* On the idle list */
struct rcu_head rq_rcu_head; /* for RCU deferred kfree */
struct svc_xprt * rq_xprt; /* transport ptr */
@@ -262,10 +264,31 @@ enum {
RQ_SPLICE_OK, /* turned off in gss privacy to prevent
* encrypting page cache pages */
RQ_VICTIM, /* Have agreed to shut down */
- RQ_BUSY, /* request is busy */
RQ_DATA, /* request has data */
};
+/**
+ * svc_thread_set_busy - mark a thread as busy
+ * @rqstp: the thread which is now busy
+ *
+ * If rq_idle is "empty", the thread must be busy.
+ */
+static inline void svc_thread_set_busy(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
+{
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rqstp->rq_idle);
+}
+
+/**
+ * svc_thread_busy - check if a thread as busy
+ * @rqstp: the thread which might be busy
+ *
+ * If rq_idle is "empty", the thread must be busy.
+ */
+static inline bool svc_thread_busy(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
+{
+ return list_empty(&rqstp->rq_idle);
+}
+
#define SVC_NET(rqst) (rqst->rq_xprt ? rqst->rq_xprt->xpt_net : rqst->rq_bc_net)
/*
diff --git a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
index 6beb38c1dcb5..337c90787fb1 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sunrpc.h
@@ -1677,7 +1677,6 @@ DEFINE_SVCXDRBUF_EVENT(sendto);
svc_rqst_flag(DROPME) \
svc_rqst_flag(SPLICE_OK) \
svc_rqst_flag(VICTIM) \
- svc_rqst_flag(BUSY) \
svc_rqst_flag_end(DATA)
#undef svc_rqst_flag
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
index 3033eaf4e0ee..ffcc5371527c 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
@@ -510,6 +510,7 @@ __svc_create(struct svc_program *prog, unsigned int bufsize, int npools,
pool->sp_id = i;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->sp_sockets);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->sp_all_threads);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->sp_idle_threads);
spin_lock_init(&pool->sp_lock);
percpu_counter_init(&pool->sp_messages_arrived, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -641,7 +642,7 @@ svc_rqst_alloc(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int node)
folio_batch_init(&rqstp->rq_fbatch);
- __set_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags);
+ svc_thread_set_busy(rqstp);
rqstp->rq_server = serv;
rqstp->rq_pool = pool;
@@ -702,10 +703,13 @@ void svc_pool_wake_idle_thread(struct svc_pool *pool)
struct svc_rqst *rqstp;
rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(rqstp, &pool->sp_all_threads, rq_all) {
- if (test_and_set_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags))
- continue;
-
+ spin_lock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
+ rqstp = list_first_entry_or_null(&pool->sp_idle_threads,
+ struct svc_rqst, rq_idle);
+ if (rqstp)
+ list_del_init(&rqstp->rq_idle);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
+ if (rqstp) {
WRITE_ONCE(rqstp->rq_qtime, ktime_get());
wake_up_process(rqstp->rq_task);
rcu_read_unlock();
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
index b8539545fefd..ebfeeb504a79 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
@@ -737,8 +737,9 @@ static void svc_rqst_wait_for_work(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
set_current_state(TASK_IDLE);
smp_mb__before_atomic();
clear_bit(SP_CONGESTED, &pool->sp_flags);
- clear_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags);
- smp_mb__after_atomic();
+ spin_lock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
+ list_add(&rqstp->rq_idle, &pool->sp_idle_threads);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
/* Need to check should_sleep() again after
* setting task state in case a wakeup happened
@@ -751,8 +752,14 @@ static void svc_rqst_wait_for_work(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
cond_resched();
}
- set_bit(RQ_BUSY, &rqstp->rq_flags);
- smp_mb__after_atomic();
+ /* We *must* be removed from the list before we can continue.
+ * If we were woken, this is already done
+ */
+ if (!svc_thread_busy(rqstp)) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
+ list_del_init(&rqstp->rq_idle);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock);
+ }
} else {
cond_resched();
}
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-15 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-15 1:54 [PATCH 00/10] SUNRPC: remainder of srv queueing work NeilBrown
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] SQUASH: SUNRPC: rename and refactor svc_get_next_xprt() NeilBrown
2023-08-15 1:54 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] SUNRPC: discard SP_CONGESTED NeilBrown
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] SUNRPC: change service idle list to be an llist NeilBrown
2023-08-15 16:59 ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-15 22:44 ` NeilBrown
2023-08-16 15:56 ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] SUNRPC: only have one thread waking up at a time NeilBrown
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] SUNRPC/svc: add light-weight queuing mechanism NeilBrown
2023-08-17 14:41 ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-17 22:06 ` NeilBrown
2023-08-18 13:38 ` Chuck Lever
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] SUNRPC: use lwq for sp_sockets - renamed to sp_xprts NeilBrown
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] SUNRPC: change sp_nrthreads to atomic_t NeilBrown
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] SUNRPC: discard sp_lock NeilBrown
2023-08-15 1:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] SUNRPC: change the back-channel queue to lwq NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230815015426.5091-3-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox