From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] llist: add interface to check if a node is on a list.
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 12:54:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230830025755.21292-3-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230830025755.21292-1-neilb@suse.de>
With list.h lists, it is easy to test if a node is on a list, providing
it was initialised and that it is removed with list_del_init().
This patch provides similar functionality for llist.h lists.
init_llist_node()
marks a node as being not-on-any-list be setting the ->next pointer to
the node itself.
llist_on_list()
tests if the node is on any list.
llist_del_first_init()
remove the first element from a llist, and marks it as being off-list.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
include/linux/llist.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/llist.h b/include/linux/llist.h
index 85bda2d02d65..dcb91e3bac1c 100644
--- a/include/linux/llist.h
+++ b/include/linux/llist.h
@@ -73,6 +73,33 @@ static inline void init_llist_head(struct llist_head *list)
list->first = NULL;
}
+/**
+ * init_llist_node - initialize lock-less list node
+ * @node: the node to be initialised
+ *
+ * In cases where there is a need to test if a node is on
+ * a list or not, this initialises the node to clearly
+ * not be on any list.
+ */
+static inline void init_llist_node(struct llist_node *node)
+{
+ node->next = node;
+}
+
+/**
+ * llist_on_list - test if a lock-list list node is on a list
+ * @node: the node to test
+ *
+ * When a node is on a list the ->next pointer will be NULL or
+ * some other node. It can never point to itself. We use that
+ * in init_llist_node() to record that a node is not on any list,
+ * and here to test whether it is on any list.
+ */
+static inline bool llist_on_list(const struct llist_node *node)
+{
+ return node->next != node;
+}
+
/**
* llist_entry - get the struct of this entry
* @ptr: the &struct llist_node pointer.
@@ -249,6 +276,21 @@ static inline struct llist_node *__llist_del_all(struct llist_head *head)
extern struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head);
+/**
+ * llist_del_first_init - delete first entry from lock-list and mark is as being off-list
+ * @head: the head of lock-less list to delete from.
+ *
+ * This behave the same as llist_del_first() except that llist_init_node() is called
+ * on the returned node so that llist_on_list() will report false for the node.
+ */
+static inline struct llist_node *llist_del_first_init(struct llist_head *head)
+{
+ struct llist_node *n = llist_del_first(head);
+
+ if (n)
+ init_llist_node(n);
+ return n;
+}
struct llist_node *llist_reverse_order(struct llist_node *head);
#endif /* LLIST_H */
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 2:54 [PATCH 00/10] SUNRPC thread management changes NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 01/10] SQUASH: revise comments in SUNRPC: change service idle list to be an llist NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] SQUASH use new llist interfaces " NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] llist: add llist_del_first_this() NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] lib: add light-weight queuing mechanism NeilBrown
2023-08-30 15:21 ` Chuck Lever
2023-09-03 23:57 ` NeilBrown
2023-08-30 15:35 ` Chuck Lever
2023-09-03 23:59 ` NeilBrown
2023-08-30 16:03 ` Chuck Lever
2023-09-04 0:02 ` NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] SUNRPC: only have one thread waking up at a time NeilBrown
2023-08-30 15:28 ` Chuck Lever
2023-09-04 0:35 ` NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] SUNRPC: use lwq for sp_sockets - renamed to sp_xprts NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] SUNRPC: change sp_nrthreads to atomic_t NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] SUNRPC: discard sp_lock NeilBrown
2023-08-30 2:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] SUNRPC: change the back-channel queue to lwq NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230830025755.21292-3-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox