linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
	jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
	conor@kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
	Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
	Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>,
	Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>, chrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 19:24:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231005172448.GA161140@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G9fYsqbZhSQnEi-qSc7n+4d7nPap8HWcdbZGWLfo3mTH-L7A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Naresh,

> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.

> > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.

> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.

> > thanks,

> > greg k-h

> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
Could you please note in your reports also LTP version?
FYI the best LTP release is always the latest release or git master branch.

Kind regards,
Petr

> NFS mounted rootfs.
> and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.

> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

> LTP hugetlb tests failed log
>   tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
>   tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
>   hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write

> LTP dio tests failed log
>   compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 .   outfile
> offset 4096: 0x00 .
>   diotest01    1  TFAIL  :  diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> infile and outfile

> ## Build
> * kernel: 6.1.56-rc1
> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> * git branch: linux-6.1.y
> * git commit: 0353a7bfd2b60c5e42c8651eb3fa4cc48159db5f
> * git describe: v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6

> ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)
> * x86_64-clang, ltp-hugetlb
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-hugetlb
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-hugetlb
>   - hugemmap11

> Test log:
> --------
>   tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
>   tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
>   hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write

> Links:
>   - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20259639/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/log
>   - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260457/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/history/

> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-dio
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-dio
>   - dio01
>   - dio02
>   - dio03
>   - dio05
>   - dio06
>   - dio07
>   - dio08
>   - dio09
>   - dio11

> Test log:
> --------
>   compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 .   outfile
> offset 4096: 0x00 .
>   diotest01    1  TFAIL  :  diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> infile and outfile
>   bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
>   bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
>   diotest02    1  TPASS  :  Read with Direct IO, Write without
>   diotest02    2  TFAIL  :  diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
>   diotest02    3  TFAIL  :  diotest2.c:210: Write with Direct IO, Read without
>   diotest02    4  TFAIL  :  diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
>   diotest02    5  TFAIL  :  diotest2.c:231: Read, Write with Direct IO
>   diotest02    0  TINFO  :  2/3 testblocks failed
>   bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
>   diotest03    1  TPASS  :  Read with Direct IO, Write without
>   diotest03    2  TFAIL  :  diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
>   diotest03    3  TFAIL  :  diotest3.c:189: Write Direct-child 0 failed
>   bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
>   diotest03    1  TPASS  :  Read with Direct IO, Write without
>   diotest03    2  TFAIL  :  diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
>   diotest03    3  TFAIL  :  diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
>   diotest03    4  TFAIL  :  diotest3.c:210: RDWR Direct-child 0 failed
>   diotest03    1  TPASS  :  Read with Direct IO, Write without
>   diotest03    2  TFAIL  :  diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
>   diotest03    3  TFAIL  :  diotest3.c:323: Read, Write with Direct IO
>   ...
>   diotest05    1  TPASS  :  Read with Direct IO, Write without
>   diotest05    2  TFAIL  :  diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
>   diotest05    3  TFAIL  :  diotest5.c:250: Write with Direct IO, Read without
>   diotest05    4  TFAIL  :  diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
>   diotest05    5  TFAIL  :  diotest5.c:271: Read, Write with Direct IO
>   diotest05    0  TINFO  :  2/3 testblocks failed

> Links:
>   - https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6842177#L1666
>   - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260389/suite/ltp-dio/test/dio01/history/

> ## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)

> ## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)

> ## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)

> ## Test result summary
> total: 121166, pass: 102582, fail: 2234, skip: 16177, xfail: 173

> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
> * arm: 140 total, 140 passed, 0 failed
> * arm64: 49 total, 49 passed, 0 failed
> * i386: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
> * mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
> * parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
> * powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
> * riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * sh: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
> * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed

> ## Test suites summary
> * boot
> * kselftest-android
> * kselftest-arm64
> * kselftest-breakpoints
> * kselftest-capabilities
> * kselftest-cgroup
> * kselftest-clone3
> * kselftest-core
> * kselftest-cpu-hotplug
> * kselftest-cpufreq
> * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
> * kselftest-efivarfs
> * kselftest-exec
> * kselftest-filesystems
> * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
> * kselftest-filesystems-epoll
> * kselftest-firmware
> * kselftest-fpu
> * kselftest-ftrace
> * kselftest-futex
> * kselftest-gpio
> * kselftest-intel_pstate
> * kselftest-ipc
> * kselftest-ir
> * kselftest-kcmp
> * kselftest-kexec
> * kselftest-kvm
> * kselftest-lib
> * kselftest-membarrier
> * kselftest-memfd
> * kselftest-memory-hotplug
> * kselftest-mincore
> * kselftest-mount
> * kselftest-mqueue
> * kselftest-net
> * kselftest-net-forwarding
> * kselftest-net-mptcp
> * kselftest-netfilter
> * kselftest-nsfs
> * kselftest-openat2
> * kselftest-pid_namespace
> * kselftest-pidfd
> * kselftest-proc
> * kselftest-pstore
> * kselftest-ptrace
> * kselftest-rseq
> * kselftest-rtc
> * kselftest-seccomp
> * kselftest-sigaltstack
> * kselftest-size
> * kselftest-splice
> * kselftest-static_keys
> * kselftest-sync
> * kselftest-sysctl
> * kselftest-tc-testing
> * kselftest-timens
> * kselftest-tmpfs
> * kselftest-tpm2
> * kselftest-user
> * kselftest-user_events
> * kselftest-vDSO
> * kselftest-vm
> * kselftest-watchdog
> * kselftest-x86
> * kselftest-zram
> * kunit
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * libgpiod
> * log-parser-boot
> * log-parser-test
> * ltp-cap_bounds
> * ltp-commands
> * ltp-containers
> * ltp-controllers
> * ltp-cpuhotplug
> * ltp-crypto
> * ltp-cve
> * ltp-dio
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests
> * ltp-filecaps
> * ltp-fs
> * ltp-fs_bind
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple
> * ltp-fsx
> * ltp-hugetlb
> * ltp-io
> * ltp-ipc
> * ltp-math
> * ltp-mm
> * ltp-nptl
> * ltp-pty
> * ltp-sched
> * ltp-securebits
> * ltp-smoke
> * ltp-syscalls
> * ltp-tracing
> * network-basic-tests
> * perf
> * rcutorture
> * v4l2-compliance

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-05 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20231004175217.404851126@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-05 16:39 ` [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-05 17:24   ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2023-10-05 19:20     ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-06  6:41       ` Petr Vorel
2023-10-06 18:42   ` Daniel Díaz
2023-10-07  8:58     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-09 16:43       ` Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231005172448.GA161140@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kolga@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@kernelci.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pavel@denx.de \
    --cc=rpalethorpe@suse.com \
    --cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=srw@sladewatkins.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).