* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
[not found] <20231004175217.404851126@linuxfoundation.org>
@ 2023-10-05 16:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-05 17:24 ` Petr Vorel
2023-10-06 18:42 ` Daniel Díaz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-10-05 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-nfs
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor, Olga Kornievskaia,
Benjamin Coddington, Anna Schumaker, Trond Myklebust, LTP List,
Petr Vorel, Richard Palethorpe, Eryu Guan, chrubis
On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
NFS mounted rootfs.
and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
LTP hugetlb tests failed log
tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
LTP dio tests failed log
compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
offset 4096: 0x00 .
diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
infile and outfile
## Build
* kernel: 6.1.56-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 0353a7bfd2b60c5e42c8651eb3fa4cc48159db5f
* git describe: v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6
## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)
* x86_64-clang, ltp-hugetlb
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-hugetlb
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-hugetlb
- hugemmap11
Test log:
--------
tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20259639/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/log
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260457/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/history/
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-dio
* bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-dio
- dio01
- dio02
- dio03
- dio05
- dio06
- dio07
- dio08
- dio09
- dio11
Test log:
--------
compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
offset 4096: 0x00 .
diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
infile and outfile
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
diotest02 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest02 2 TFAIL : diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
diotest02 3 TFAIL : diotest2.c:210: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest02 4 TFAIL : diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
diotest02 5 TFAIL : diotest2.c:231: Read, Write with Direct IO
diotest02 0 TINFO : 2/3 testblocks failed
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:189: Write Direct-child 0 failed
bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
diotest03 4 TFAIL : diotest3.c:210: RDWR Direct-child 0 failed
diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:323: Read, Write with Direct IO
...
diotest05 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
diotest05 2 TFAIL : diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
diotest05 3 TFAIL : diotest5.c:250: Write with Direct IO, Read without
diotest05 4 TFAIL : diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
diotest05 5 TFAIL : diotest5.c:271: Read, Write with Direct IO
diotest05 0 TINFO : 2/3 testblocks failed
Links:
- https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6842177#L1666
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260389/suite/ltp-dio/test/dio01/history/
## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)
## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)
## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)
## Test result summary
total: 121166, pass: 102582, fail: 2234, skip: 16177, xfail: 173
## Build Summary
* arc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 140 total, 140 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 49 total, 49 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-watchdog
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
2023-10-05 16:39 ` [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-10-05 17:24 ` Petr Vorel
2023-10-05 19:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-06 18:42 ` Daniel Díaz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2023-10-05 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-nfs, stable, patches, linux-kernel,
torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Olga Kornievskaia, Benjamin Coddington, Anna Schumaker,
Trond Myklebust, LTP List, Richard Palethorpe, Eryu Guan, chrubis
Hi Naresh,
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > thanks,
> > greg k-h
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
Could you please note in your reports also LTP version?
FYI the best LTP release is always the latest release or git master branch.
Kind regards,
Petr
> NFS mounted rootfs.
> and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> LTP hugetlb tests failed log
> tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
> tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
> LTP dio tests failed log
> compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
> offset 4096: 0x00 .
> diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> infile and outfile
> ## Build
> * kernel: 6.1.56-rc1
> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> * git branch: linux-6.1.y
> * git commit: 0353a7bfd2b60c5e42c8651eb3fa4cc48159db5f
> * git describe: v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6
> * test details:
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6
> ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)
> * x86_64-clang, ltp-hugetlb
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-hugetlb
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-hugetlb
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-hugetlb
> - hugemmap11
> Test log:
> --------
> tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
> tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
> Links:
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20259639/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/log
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260457/suite/ltp-hugetlb/test/hugemmap11/history/
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-dio
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-clang, ltp-dio
> * bcm2711-rpi-4-b-64k_page_size, ltp-dio
> - dio01
> - dio02
> - dio03
> - dio05
> - dio06
> - dio07
> - dio08
> - dio09
> - dio11
> Test log:
> --------
> compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
> offset 4096: 0x00 .
> diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> infile and outfile
> bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
> bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
> diotest02 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
> diotest02 2 TFAIL : diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
> diotest02 3 TFAIL : diotest2.c:210: Write with Direct IO, Read without
> diotest02 4 TFAIL : diotest2.c:119: read/write comparision failed
> diotest02 5 TFAIL : diotest2.c:231: Read, Write with Direct IO
> diotest02 0 TINFO : 2/3 testblocks failed
> bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
> diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
> diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
> diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:189: Write Direct-child 0 failed
> bufcmp: offset 0: Expected: 0x1, got 0x0
> diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
> diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
> diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:136: comparsion failed; child=0 offset=0
> diotest03 4 TFAIL : diotest3.c:210: RDWR Direct-child 0 failed
> diotest03 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
> diotest03 2 TFAIL : diotest3.c:306: Write with Direct IO, Read without
> diotest03 3 TFAIL : diotest3.c:323: Read, Write with Direct IO
> ...
> diotest05 1 TPASS : Read with Direct IO, Write without
> diotest05 2 TFAIL : diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
> diotest05 3 TFAIL : diotest5.c:250: Write with Direct IO, Read without
> diotest05 4 TFAIL : diotest5.c:141: readv/writev comparision failed
> diotest05 5 TFAIL : diotest5.c:271: Read, Write with Direct IO
> diotest05 0 TINFO : 2/3 testblocks failed
> Links:
> - https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/6842177#L1666
> - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.55-260-g0353a7bfd2b6/testrun/20260389/suite/ltp-dio/test/dio01/history/
> ## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.55)
> ## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)
> ## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.55)
> ## Test result summary
> total: 121166, pass: 102582, fail: 2234, skip: 16177, xfail: 173
> ## Build Summary
> * arc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
> * arm: 140 total, 140 passed, 0 failed
> * arm64: 49 total, 49 passed, 0 failed
> * i386: 33 total, 33 passed, 0 failed
> * mips: 24 total, 24 passed, 0 failed
> * parisc: 3 total, 3 passed, 0 failed
> * powerpc: 34 total, 34 passed, 0 failed
> * riscv: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
> * sh: 11 total, 11 passed, 0 failed
> * sparc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
> * x86_64: 40 total, 40 passed, 0 failed
> ## Test suites summary
> * boot
> * kselftest-android
> * kselftest-arm64
> * kselftest-breakpoints
> * kselftest-capabilities
> * kselftest-cgroup
> * kselftest-clone3
> * kselftest-core
> * kselftest-cpu-hotplug
> * kselftest-cpufreq
> * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
> * kselftest-efivarfs
> * kselftest-exec
> * kselftest-filesystems
> * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
> * kselftest-filesystems-epoll
> * kselftest-firmware
> * kselftest-fpu
> * kselftest-ftrace
> * kselftest-futex
> * kselftest-gpio
> * kselftest-intel_pstate
> * kselftest-ipc
> * kselftest-ir
> * kselftest-kcmp
> * kselftest-kexec
> * kselftest-kvm
> * kselftest-lib
> * kselftest-membarrier
> * kselftest-memfd
> * kselftest-memory-hotplug
> * kselftest-mincore
> * kselftest-mount
> * kselftest-mqueue
> * kselftest-net
> * kselftest-net-forwarding
> * kselftest-net-mptcp
> * kselftest-netfilter
> * kselftest-nsfs
> * kselftest-openat2
> * kselftest-pid_namespace
> * kselftest-pidfd
> * kselftest-proc
> * kselftest-pstore
> * kselftest-ptrace
> * kselftest-rseq
> * kselftest-rtc
> * kselftest-seccomp
> * kselftest-sigaltstack
> * kselftest-size
> * kselftest-splice
> * kselftest-static_keys
> * kselftest-sync
> * kselftest-sysctl
> * kselftest-tc-testing
> * kselftest-timens
> * kselftest-tmpfs
> * kselftest-tpm2
> * kselftest-user
> * kselftest-user_events
> * kselftest-vDSO
> * kselftest-vm
> * kselftest-watchdog
> * kselftest-x86
> * kselftest-zram
> * kunit
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * libgpiod
> * log-parser-boot
> * log-parser-test
> * ltp-cap_bounds
> * ltp-commands
> * ltp-containers
> * ltp-controllers
> * ltp-cpuhotplug
> * ltp-crypto
> * ltp-cve
> * ltp-dio
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests
> * ltp-filecaps
> * ltp-fs
> * ltp-fs_bind
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple
> * ltp-fsx
> * ltp-hugetlb
> * ltp-io
> * ltp-ipc
> * ltp-math
> * ltp-mm
> * ltp-nptl
> * ltp-pty
> * ltp-sched
> * ltp-securebits
> * ltp-smoke
> * ltp-syscalls
> * ltp-tracing
> * network-basic-tests
> * perf
> * rcutorture
> * v4l2-compliance
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
2023-10-05 17:24 ` Petr Vorel
@ 2023-10-05 19:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-06 6:41 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-10-05 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Vorel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-nfs, stable, patches, linux-kernel,
torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Olga Kornievskaia, Benjamin Coddington, Anna Schumaker,
Trond Myklebust, LTP List, Richard Palethorpe, Eryu Guan, chrubis
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 22:54, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi Naresh,
>
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
>
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> > > thanks,
>
> > > greg k-h
>
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
> Could you please note in your reports also LTP version?
Sure.
We are running LTP Version: 20230516 for our testing.
We will update the latest LTP release (20230929) next week.
> FYI the best LTP release is always the latest release or git master branch.
We have two threads here.
1) LTP release tag testing on all stable-rc branches
2) LTP master testing on a given specific kernel version [a]
[a] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/ltp-master/
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
2023-10-05 19:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2023-10-06 6:41 ` Petr Vorel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Petr Vorel @ 2023-10-06 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-nfs, stable, patches, linux-kernel,
torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Olga Kornievskaia, Benjamin Coddington, Anna Schumaker,
Trond Myklebust, LTP List, Richard Palethorpe, Eryu Guan, chrubis
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 22:54, Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Hi Naresh,
> > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > > > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > thanks,
> > > > greg k-h
> > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
> > Could you please note in your reports also LTP version?
> Sure.
> We are running LTP Version: 20230516 for our testing.
> We will update the latest LTP release (20230929) next week.
Great, thank you.
> > FYI the best LTP release is always the latest release or git master branch.
> We have two threads here.
> 1) LTP release tag testing on all stable-rc branches
> 2) LTP master testing on a given specific kernel version [a]
Great, this makes sense.
BTW from looking in the log [b] ("INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL")
I see you use runltp. We recommend to switch to kirk [c]. And we definitely
appreciate your feedback from it.
Kind regards,
Petr
> [a] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/ltp-master/
[b] https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/ltp-master/build/v6.5.3_20230929-2-g48a150bfd/testrun/20223790/suite/ltp-cve/test/cve-2017-8890/log
[c] https://github.com/linux-test-project/kirk/#readme
> - Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
2023-10-05 16:39 ` [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-05 17:24 ` Petr Vorel
@ 2023-10-06 18:42 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-10-07 8:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Díaz @ 2023-10-06 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, linux-nfs, stable, patches, linux-kernel,
torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Olga Kornievskaia, Benjamin Coddington, Anna Schumaker,
Trond Myklebust, LTP List, Petr Vorel, Richard Palethorpe,
Eryu Guan, chrubis
Hello!
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
> NFS mounted rootfs.
> and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
> LTP hugetlb tests failed log
> tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
> tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
>
> LTP dio tests failed log
> compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
> offset 4096: 0x00 .
> diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> infile and outfile
Bisection led to "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues" (upstream commit
7c6339322ce0c6128acbe36aacc1eeb986dd7bf1). Reverting that patch and
"NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling" (upstream
commit 954998b60caa8f2a3bf3abe490de6f08d283687a) (not a clean revert
this one) made ltp-dio pass again.
Greetings!
Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
2023-10-06 18:42 ` Daniel Díaz
@ 2023-10-07 8:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-09 16:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2023-10-07 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Díaz
Cc: Naresh Kamboju, linux-nfs, stable, patches, linux-kernel,
torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Olga Kornievskaia, Benjamin Coddington, Anna Schumaker,
Trond Myklebust, LTP List, Petr Vorel, Richard Palethorpe,
Eryu Guan, chrubis
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:42:04PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
> > NFS mounted rootfs.
> > and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> > LTP hugetlb tests failed log
> > tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
> > tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
> >
> > LTP dio tests failed log
> > compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
> > offset 4096: 0x00 .
> > diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> > infile and outfile
>
> Bisection led to "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues" (upstream commit
> 7c6339322ce0c6128acbe36aacc1eeb986dd7bf1). Reverting that patch and
> "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling" (upstream
> commit 954998b60caa8f2a3bf3abe490de6f08d283687a) (not a clean revert
> this one) made ltp-dio pass again.
So this is also an issue in Linus's tree? Or is it only on the 6.1.y
tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review
2023-10-07 8:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2023-10-09 16:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2023-10-09 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Daniel Díaz, linux-nfs, stable, patches, linux-kernel,
torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw, rwarsow, conor,
Olga Kornievskaia, Benjamin Coddington, Anna Schumaker,
Trond Myklebust, LTP List, Petr Vorel, Richard Palethorpe,
Eryu Guan, chrubis
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 14:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 12:42:04PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 10:40, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.56 release.
> > > > There are 259 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Fri, 06 Oct 2023 17:51:12 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.56-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > >
> > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > Regressions on arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b device running LTP dio tests on
> > > NFS mounted rootfs.
> > > and LTP hugetlb hugemmap11 test case failed on x86 and arm64 bcm2711-rpi-4-b.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > LTP hugetlb tests failed log
> > > tst_hugepage.c:83: TINFO: 1 hugepage(s) reserved
> > > tst_test.c:1558: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > > hugemmap11.c:47: TFAIL: Memory mismatch after Direct-IO write
> > >
> > > LTP dio tests failed log
> > > compare_file: char mismatch: infile offset 4096: 0x01 . outfile
> > > offset 4096: 0x00 .
> > > diotest01 1 TFAIL : diotest1.c:158: file compare failed for
> > > infile and outfile
> >
> > Bisection led to "NFS: Fix O_DIRECT locking issues" (upstream commit
> > 7c6339322ce0c6128acbe36aacc1eeb986dd7bf1). Reverting that patch and
> > "NFS: Fix error handling for O_DIRECT write scheduling" (upstream
> > commit 954998b60caa8f2a3bf3abe490de6f08d283687a) (not a clean revert
> > this one) made ltp-dio pass again.
>
> So this is also an issue in Linus's tree? Or is it only on the 6.1.y
It is only on the 6.1.y branch.
- Naresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-09 16:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20231004175217.404851126@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-05 16:39 ` [PATCH 6.1 000/259] 6.1.56-rc1 review Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-05 17:24 ` Petr Vorel
2023-10-05 19:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-10-06 6:41 ` Petr Vorel
2023-10-06 18:42 ` Daniel Díaz
2023-10-07 8:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-10-09 16:43 ` Naresh Kamboju
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).