From: trondmy@kernel.org
To: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] pNFS: Fix a hang in nfs4_evict_inode()
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 14:20:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231008182019.12842-1-trondmy@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
We are not allowed to call pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return() without
also holding a reference to the layout header, since doing so could lead
to the reference count going to zero when we call
pnfs_layout_remove_lseg(). This again can lead to a hang when we get to
nfs4_evict_inode() and are unable to clear the layout pointer.
pnfs_layout_return_unused_byserver() is guilty of this behaviour, and
has been seen to trigger the refcount warning prior to a hang.
Fixes: b6d49ecd1081 ("NFSv4: Fix a pNFS layout related use-after-free race when freeing the inode")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index 63904a372b2f..21a365357629 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -2638,31 +2638,44 @@ pnfs_should_return_unused_layout(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo,
return mode == 0;
}
-static int
-pnfs_layout_return_unused_byserver(struct nfs_server *server, void *data)
+static int pnfs_layout_return_unused_byserver(struct nfs_server *server,
+ void *data)
{
const struct pnfs_layout_range *range = data;
+ const struct cred *cred;
struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
struct inode *inode;
+ nfs4_stateid stateid;
+ enum pnfs_iomode iomode;
+
restart:
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(lo, &server->layouts, plh_layouts) {
- if (!pnfs_layout_can_be_returned(lo) ||
+ inode = lo->plh_inode;
+ if (!inode || !pnfs_layout_can_be_returned(lo) ||
test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_REQUESTED, &lo->plh_flags))
continue;
- inode = lo->plh_inode;
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
- if (!pnfs_should_return_unused_layout(lo, range)) {
+ if (!lo->plh_inode ||
+ !pnfs_should_return_unused_layout(lo, range)) {
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
continue;
}
+ pnfs_get_layout_hdr(lo);
+ pnfs_set_plh_return_info(lo, range->iomode, 0);
+ if (pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_return(lo, &lo->plh_return_segs,
+ range, 0) != 0 ||
+ !pnfs_prepare_layoutreturn(lo, &stateid, &cred, &iomode)) {
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
+ cond_resched();
+ goto restart;
+ }
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
- inode = pnfs_grab_inode_layout_hdr(lo);
- if (!inode)
- continue;
rcu_read_unlock();
- pnfs_mark_layout_for_return(inode, range);
- iput(inode);
+ pnfs_send_layoutreturn(lo, &stateid, &cred, iomode, false);
+ pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);
cond_resched();
goto restart;
}
--
2.41.0
next reply other threads:[~2023-10-08 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-08 18:20 trondmy [this message]
2023-11-01 13:20 ` [PATCH] pNFS: Fix a hang in nfs4_evict_inode() Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231008182019.12842-1-trondmy@kernel.org \
--to=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).