From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/13] nfsd: hold ->cl_lock for hash_delegation_locked()
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 12:08:22 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240130011102.8623-3-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130011102.8623-1-neilb@suse.de>
The protocol for creating a new state in nfsd is to allocate the state
leaving it largely uninitialised, add that state to the ->cl_stateids
idr so as to reserve a state-id, then complete initialisation of the
state and only set ->sc_type to non-zero once the state is fully
initialised.
If a state is found in the idr with ->sc_type == 0, it is ignored.
The ->cl_lock lock is used to avoid races - it is held while checking
sc_type during lookup, and held when a non-zero value is stored in
->sc_type.
... except... hash_delegation_locked() finalises the initialisation of a
delegation state, but does NOT hold ->cl_lock.
So this patch takes ->cl_lock at the appropriate time w.r.t other locks,
and so ensures there are no races (which are extremely unlikely in any
case).
As ->fi_lock is often taken when ->cl_lock is held, we need to take
->cl_lock first of those two.
Currently ->cl_lock and state_lock are never both taken at the same time.
We need both for this patch so an arbitrary choice is needed concerning
which to take first. As state_lock is more global, it might be more
contended, so take it first.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 5e640e9945cd..ae00f9327245 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -1312,6 +1312,7 @@ hash_delegation_locked(struct nfs4_delegation *dp, struct nfs4_file *fp)
lockdep_assert_held(&state_lock);
lockdep_assert_held(&fp->fi_lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&clp->cl_lock);
if (nfs4_delegation_exists(clp, fp))
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -5558,12 +5559,14 @@ nfs4_set_delegation(struct nfsd4_open *open, struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp,
goto out_unlock;
spin_lock(&state_lock);
+ spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
if (fp->fi_had_conflict)
status = -EAGAIN;
else
status = hash_delegation_locked(dp, fp);
spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
spin_unlock(&state_lock);
if (status)
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-30 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 1:08 [PATCH 00/13 v5] nfsd: support admin-revocation of v4 state NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 01/13] nfsd: remove stale comment in nfs4_show_deleg() NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 03/13] nfsd: don't call functions with side-effecting inside WARN_ON() NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 04/13] nfsd: avoid race after unhash_delegation_locked() NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 05/13] nfsd: split sc_status out of sc_type NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 06/13] nfsd: prepare for supporting admin-revocation of state NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 07/13] nfsd: allow state with no file to appear in /proc/fs/nfsd/clients/*/states NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 08/13] nfsd: report in /proc/fs/nfsd/clients/*/states when state is admin-revoke NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 09/13] nfsd: allow admin-revoked NFSv4.0 state to be freed NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 10/13] nfsd: allow lock state ids to be revoked and then freed NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 11/13] nfsd: allow open " NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 12/13] nfsd: allow delegation " NeilBrown
2024-01-30 1:08 ` [PATCH 13/13] nfsd: allow layout state to be admin-revoked NeilBrown
2024-01-30 12:21 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-30 22:13 ` NeilBrown
2024-01-30 22:23 ` Jeff Layton
2024-01-31 15:28 ` [PATCH 00/13 v5] nfsd: support admin-revocation of v4 state Chuck Lever III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-29 3:29 [PATCH 00/13 v4] " NeilBrown
2024-01-29 3:29 ` [PATCH 02/13] nfsd: hold ->cl_lock for hash_delegation_locked() NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240130011102.8623-3-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loghyr@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).