From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] nfsd: move nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay() earlier in open handling.
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:09:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240408021156.6104-3-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408021156.6104-1-neilb@suse.de>
Rather than taking the rp_mutex (via nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay) in
nfsd4_cleanup_open_state() (which seems counter-intuitive), take it and
assign rp_owner as soon as possible - in nfsd4_process_open1().
This will support a future change when nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay() might
fail.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 6ac1dff29d42..2ff8cb50f2e3 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -5360,6 +5360,7 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
open->op_openowner = oo;
if (!oo)
return nfserr_jukebox;
+ nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay(cstate, &oo->oo_owner);
status = nfsd4_check_seqid(cstate, &oo->oo_owner, open->op_seqid);
if (status)
return status;
@@ -6134,12 +6135,8 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf
void nfsd4_cleanup_open_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
struct nfsd4_open *open)
{
- if (open->op_openowner) {
- struct nfs4_stateowner *so = &open->op_openowner->oo_owner;
-
- nfsd4_cstate_assign_replay(cstate, so);
- nfs4_put_stateowner(so);
- }
+ if (open->op_openowner)
+ nfs4_put_stateowner(&open->op_openowner->oo_owner);
if (open->op_file)
kmem_cache_free(file_slab, open->op_file);
if (open->op_stp)
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-08 2:09 [PATCH 0/4 v4] nfsd: fix deadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-04-08 2:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd: perform all find_openstateowner_str calls in the one place NeilBrown
2024-04-08 2:09 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2024-04-08 2:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: replace rp_mutex to avoid deadlock in move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-04-08 2:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: drop st_mutex before calling move_to_close_lru() NeilBrown
2024-04-09 2:09 ` [PATCH 0/4 v4] nfsd: fix deadlock in move_to_close_lru() Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240408021156.6104-3-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).