From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B9B1799D; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 06:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713075221; cv=none; b=m9Rh/cwOh4Dg+LRMDPf92tknExMww6RMu12gsU31dHeo2wBgGjC6PDXiGV1bwmoza3NlPCaAk/9BsUJv7ycMMHHs9NwQ+zZq96FRnCk7EQFC8arlir7R8qCGcyUoasFDFKHK283gsoN7LCqC0++CfFeRU8ClmERwuo7UXza/9KQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713075221; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a/UKSDLT2RB4LLEbvIebaNm82geJbaWNHm2MRarQ+Cg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IDIJ9nlK3dH0N1VuQPYbWA/nqWXvNLDq/0SK2K3+p4ucMk1scgrO06Y8Fhq2ztjFP0uHRVsximpcw8sH24lU9tTPpEGm9bu0SFxl4e8SaN/7W/RQyl/blzMVFvDPEOQjMxXqx9sCBSI1ZLpgVD8w9xjf82NL6P50DDZSwich2SI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=CCsIvchc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="CCsIvchc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 366CCC072AA; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 06:13:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1713075220; bh=a/UKSDLT2RB4LLEbvIebaNm82geJbaWNHm2MRarQ+Cg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CCsIvchccziDtRuYg+jt7ur0f12+B8TRORh546ABw8naHDV7Wj2hT4e0/w29T+WO+ GYYOM0WN6jfCNES09XbvxtFum081za5gfLFVphj4pEJ7dN3JHcX5A5md4L/YunAMZ0 GB+w39gjhTPRliv+ZNC1RoggBAt4m5tx7WQV0fCU= Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 08:13:32 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Chuck Lever Cc: Harshit Mogalapalli , linux-stable , "patches@lists.linux.dev" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , "shuah@kernel.org" , "patches@kernelci.org" , "lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org" , "pavel@denx.de" , "jonathanh@nvidia.com" , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , "sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com" , "srw@sladewatkins.net" , "rwarsow@gmx.de" , "conor@kernel.org" , "allen.lkml@gmail.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" , Calum Mackay , Vegard Nossum , Darren Kenny , Ramanan Govindarajan , Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/57] 5.15.155-rc1 review Message-ID: <2024041402-impeach-charting-60f5@gregkh> References: <20240411095407.982258070@linuxfoundation.org> <2c2362c7-ace7-4a79-861e-fa435e46ac85@oracle.com> <27E1E4C4-86C3-4D78-AF85-50C1612675E0@oracle.com> <21c9bcf9-2d44-4ab2-b05c-a1712ac1a434@oracle.com> <11019956-95c4-4c35-b690-b8515b439eb2@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 11:56:15AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 03:04:19AM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote: > > Hi Chuck and Greg, > > > > On 13/04/24 01:53, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 01:41:52AM +0530, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote: > > > > # first bad commit: [2267b2e84593bd3d61a1188e68fba06307fa9dab] lockd: > > > > introduce safe async lock op > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope the above might help. > > > > > > Nice work. Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > I didnot test the revert of culprit commit on top of 5.15.154 yet. > > > > > > Please try reverting that one -- it's very close to the top so one > > > or two others might need to be pulled off as well. > > > > > > > I have reverted the bad commit: 2267b2e84593 ("lockd: introduce safe async > > lock op") and the test passes. > > > > Note: Its reverts cleanly on 5.15.154 > > Harshit also informs me that "lockd: introduce safe async lock op" > is not applied to v6.1, so it's not likely necessary to include here > and can be safely reverted from v5.15.y. Chuck, can you send a series of reverts for what needs to be done here as these were your original backports? thanks, greg k-h