From: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
Cc: anna@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] NFS: Fix READ_PLUS when server doesn't support OP_READ_PLUS
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:24:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240425202429.439014-1-anna@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Olga showed me a case where the client was sending multiple READ_PLUS
calls to the server in parallel, and the server replied
NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP to each. The client would fall back to READ for the
first reply, but fail to retry the other calls.
I fix this by removing the test for NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS in
nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(). This allows us to reschedule any
READ_PLUS call that has a NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP return value, even after the
capability has been cleared.
Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Fixes: c567552612ec ("NFS: Add READ_PLUS data segment support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index ea390db94b62..c93c12063b3a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5456,7 +5456,7 @@ static bool nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(struct rpc_task *task,
struct rpc_message *msg = &task->tk_msg;
if (msg->rpc_proc == &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ_PLUS] &&
- server->caps & NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS && task->tk_status == -ENOTSUPP) {
+ task->tk_status == -ENOTSUPP) {
server->caps &= ~NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS;
msg->rpc_proc = &nfs4_procedures[NFSPROC4_CLNT_READ];
rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-25 20:24 Anna Schumaker [this message]
2024-04-26 11:43 ` [PATCH] NFS: Fix READ_PLUS when server doesn't support OP_READ_PLUS Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240425202429.439014-1-anna@kernel.org \
--to=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).