* [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes
@ 2024-08-23 22:27 Jeff Layton
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr Jeff Layton
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-08-23 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever, Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Jeff Layton
Fixes for a couple of CB_GETATTR bugs I found while working on the
delstid set. Mostly this just ensures that we hold references to the
delegation while working with it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
Jeff Layton (2):
nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: a204501e1743d695ca2930ed25a2be9f8ced96d3
change-id: 20240823-nfsd-fixes-61f0c785d125
Best regards,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
2024-08-23 22:27 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Jeff Layton
@ 2024-08-23 22:27 ` Jeff Layton
2024-08-24 15:03 ` Chuck Lever
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release Jeff Layton
2024-08-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Chuck Lever
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-08-23 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever, Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Jeff Layton
Once we've dropped the flc_lock, there is nothing that ensures that the
delegation that was found will still be around later. Take a reference
to it while holding the lock and then drop it when we've finished with
the delegation.
Fixes: c5967721e106 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index dafff707e23a..19d39872be32 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -8837,7 +8837,6 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id);
struct file_lock_context *ctx;
struct file_lease *fl;
- struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
struct iattr attrs;
struct nfs4_cb_fattr *ncf;
@@ -8862,7 +8861,8 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
goto break_lease;
}
if (type == F_WRLCK) {
- dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
+ struct nfs4_delegation *dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
+
if (dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
return 0;
@@ -8870,6 +8870,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
break_lease:
nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
+ refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
@@ -8879,8 +8880,10 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
/* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
- !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
+ !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode)) {
+ nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
return status;
+ }
}
if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
(ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
@@ -8900,6 +8903,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
*size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
*modified = true;
}
+ nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
return 0;
}
break;
--
2.46.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release
2024-08-23 22:27 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Jeff Layton
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr Jeff Layton
@ 2024-08-23 22:27 ` Jeff Layton
2024-08-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Chuck Lever
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-08-23 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever, Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey
Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Jeff Layton
Once we drop the delegation reference, the fields embedded in it are no
longer safe to access. Do that last.
Fixes: c5967721e106 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 19d39872be32..02d43f95146e 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3078,9 +3078,9 @@ nfsd4_cb_getattr_release(struct nfsd4_callback *cb)
struct nfs4_delegation *dp =
container_of(ncf, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_cb_fattr);
- nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
clear_bit(CB_GETATTR_BUSY, &ncf->ncf_cb_flags);
wake_up_bit(&ncf->ncf_cb_flags, CB_GETATTR_BUSY);
+ nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
}
static const struct nfsd4_callback_ops nfsd4_cb_recall_any_ops = {
--
2.46.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr Jeff Layton
@ 2024-08-24 15:03 ` Chuck Lever
2024-08-24 16:39 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2024-08-24 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Layton
Cc: Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:27:38PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Once we've dropped the flc_lock, there is nothing that ensures that the
> delegation that was found will still be around later. Take a reference
> to it while holding the lock and then drop it when we've finished with
> the delegation.
>
> Fixes: c5967721e106 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index dafff707e23a..19d39872be32 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -8837,7 +8837,6 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id);
> struct file_lock_context *ctx;
> struct file_lease *fl;
> - struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> struct iattr attrs;
> struct nfs4_cb_fattr *ncf;
>
> @@ -8862,7 +8861,8 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> goto break_lease;
> }
> if (type == F_WRLCK) {
> - dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> + struct nfs4_delegation *dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
Setting @dp here seems redundant; just below, after the break_lease
label it is set again to the same value. May I change this line to:
struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> +
> if (dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
> spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> return 0;
> @@ -8870,6 +8870,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> break_lease:
> nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
> dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> + refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
> ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
> nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
> spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> @@ -8879,8 +8880,10 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
> status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
> if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> - !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
> + !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode)) {
> + nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> return status;
> + }
> }
> if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
> (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
> @@ -8900,6 +8903,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
> *modified = true;
> }
> + nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> return 0;
> }
> break;
>
> --
> 2.46.0
>
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
2024-08-24 15:03 ` Chuck Lever
@ 2024-08-24 16:39 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-08-24 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever
Cc: Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Sat, 2024-08-24 at 11:03 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:27:38PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Once we've dropped the flc_lock, there is nothing that ensures that the
> > delegation that was found will still be around later. Take a reference
> > to it while holding the lock and then drop it when we've finished with
> > the delegation.
> >
> > Fixes: c5967721e106 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 10 +++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index dafff707e23a..19d39872be32 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -8837,7 +8837,6 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> > struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id);
> > struct file_lock_context *ctx;
> > struct file_lease *fl;
> > - struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
> > struct iattr attrs;
> > struct nfs4_cb_fattr *ncf;
> >
> > @@ -8862,7 +8861,8 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> > goto break_lease;
> > }
> > if (type == F_WRLCK) {
> > - dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> > + struct nfs4_delegation *dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
>
> Setting @dp here seems redundant; just below, after the break_lease
> label it is set again to the same value. May I change this line to:
>
> struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
>
I don't think you can just remove that one since it's dereferenced just
after that. The problem is the goto break_lease case needs to have that
assigned too so you also can't just remove the later one.
The way the code flows here is weird, unfortunately, but I don't see an
easy way to improve it right offhand. Maybe assign "dp" just before the
"goto break_lease" ?
> > +
> > if (dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
> > spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > return 0;
> > @@ -8870,6 +8870,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> > break_lease:
> > nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
> > dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> > + refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
> > ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
> > nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
> > spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > @@ -8879,8 +8880,10 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> > /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
> > status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
> > if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> > - !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
> > + !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode)) {
> > + nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> > return status;
> > + }
> > }
> > if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
> > (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
> > @@ -8900,6 +8903,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct inode *inode,
> > *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
> > *modified = true;
> > }
> > + nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > break;
> >
> > --
> > 2.46.0
> >
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes
2024-08-23 22:27 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Jeff Layton
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr Jeff Layton
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release Jeff Layton
@ 2024-08-24 17:57 ` Chuck Lever
2024-08-25 23:22 ` NeilBrown
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2024-08-24 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Layton
Cc: Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:27:37PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Fixes for a couple of CB_GETATTR bugs I found while working on the
> delstid set. Mostly this just ensures that we hold references to the
> delegation while working with it.
>
>
Applied to nfsd-fixes for v6.11-rc, thanks!
[1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
commit: 8fceb5f6636bbbf803fe29fff59f138206559964
[2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release
commit: 8bc97f9b84c8852fcc56be2382f5115c518de785
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes
2024-08-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Chuck Lever
@ 2024-08-25 23:22 ` NeilBrown
2024-08-26 14:37 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2024-08-25 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Lever
Cc: Jeff Layton, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:27:37PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Fixes for a couple of CB_GETATTR bugs I found while working on the
> > delstid set. Mostly this just ensures that we hold references to the
> > delegation while working with it.
> >
> >
>
> Applied to nfsd-fixes for v6.11-rc, thanks!
>
> [1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
> commit: 8fceb5f6636bbbf803fe29fff59f138206559964
> [2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release
> commit: 8bc97f9b84c8852fcc56be2382f5115c518de785
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
Maybe the following can tidy up that code. I can split this into
a few separate patches if you like.
Thoughts?
Note that the patch is easier to review if you apply it then use "git
diff -b".
NeilBrown
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: untangle code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict()
The code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict() is convoluted and buggy.
With this patch we:
- properly handle non-nfsd leases. We must not assume flc_owner is a
delegation unless fl_lmops == &nfsd_lease_mng_ops
- move the main code out of the for loop
- have a single exit which calls nfs4_put_stid()
(and other exits which don't need to call that)
Fixes: c5967721e106 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 2c4b9a22b2bb..7672fa7a70f3 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -8837,6 +8837,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry *dentry,
struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id);
struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
struct file_lock_context *ctx;
+ struct nfs4_delegation *dp = NULL;
struct nfs4_cb_fattr *ncf;
struct file_lease *fl;
struct iattr attrs;
@@ -8845,77 +8846,76 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry *dentry,
ctx = locks_inode_context(inode);
if (!ctx)
return 0;
+
+#define NON_NFSD_LEASE ((void*)1)
+
spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
for_each_file_lock(fl, &ctx->flc_lease) {
- unsigned char type = fl->c.flc_type;
-
if (fl->c.flc_flags == FL_LAYOUT)
continue;
- if (fl->fl_lmops != &nfsd_lease_mng_ops) {
- /*
- * non-nfs lease, if it's a lease with F_RDLCK then
- * we are done; there isn't any write delegation
- * on this inode
- */
- if (type == F_RDLCK)
- break;
- goto break_lease;
- }
- if (type == F_WRLCK) {
- struct nfs4_delegation *dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
-
- if (dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
- spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
- return 0;
- }
-break_lease:
- nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
- dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
- refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
- ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
- nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
- spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
- wait_on_bit_timeout(&ncf->ncf_cb_flags, CB_GETATTR_BUSY,
- TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFSD_CB_GETATTR_TIMEOUT);
- if (ncf->ncf_cb_status) {
- /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
- status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
- if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
- !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode)) {
- nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
- return status;
- }
- }
- if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
- (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
- ncf->ncf_cur_fsize != ncf->ncf_cb_fsize))
- ncf->ncf_file_modified = true;
- if (ncf->ncf_file_modified) {
- int err;
-
- /*
- * Per section 10.4.3 of RFC 8881, the server would
- * not update the file's metadata with the client's
- * modified size
- */
- attrs.ia_mtime = attrs.ia_ctime = current_time(inode);
- attrs.ia_valid = ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_DELEG;
- inode_lock(inode);
- err = notify_change(&nop_mnt_idmap, dentry, &attrs, NULL);
- inode_unlock(inode);
- if (err) {
- nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
- return nfserrno(err);
- }
- ncf->ncf_cur_fsize = ncf->ncf_cb_fsize;
- *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
- *modified = true;
- }
- nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
- return 0;
+ if (fl->c.flc_type == F_WRLCK) {
+ if (fl->fl_lmops == &nfsd_lease_mng_ops)
+ dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
+ else
+ dp = NON_NFSD_LEASE;
}
break;
}
+ if (dp == NULL || dp == NON_NFSD_LEASE ||
+ dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
+ spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+ if (dp == NON_NFSD_LEASE) {
+ status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode,
+ NFSD_MAY_READ));
+ if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
+ !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
+ return status;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
+ refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
+ ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
+ nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
- return 0;
+
+ wait_on_bit_timeout(&ncf->ncf_cb_flags, CB_GETATTR_BUSY,
+ TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFSD_CB_GETATTR_TIMEOUT);
+ if (ncf->ncf_cb_status) {
+ /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
+ status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
+ if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
+ !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
+ goto out_status;
+ }
+ if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
+ (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
+ ncf->ncf_cur_fsize != ncf->ncf_cb_fsize))
+ ncf->ncf_file_modified = true;
+ if (ncf->ncf_file_modified) {
+ int err;
+
+ /*
+ * Per section 10.4.3 of RFC 8881, the server would
+ * not update the file's metadata with the client's
+ * modified size
+ */
+ attrs.ia_mtime = attrs.ia_ctime = current_time(inode);
+ attrs.ia_valid = ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_DELEG;
+ inode_lock(inode);
+ err = notify_change(&nop_mnt_idmap, dentry, &attrs, NULL);
+ inode_unlock(inode);
+ if (err) {
+ status = nfserrno(err);
+ goto out_status;
+ }
+ ncf->ncf_cur_fsize = ncf->ncf_cb_fsize;
+ *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
+ *modified = true;
+ }
+ status = 0;
+out_status:
+ nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
+ return status;
}
--
2.44.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes
2024-08-25 23:22 ` NeilBrown
@ 2024-08-26 14:37 ` Jeff Layton
2024-08-26 14:47 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-08-26 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown, Chuck Lever
Cc: Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 09:22 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2024, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:27:37PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > Fixes for a couple of CB_GETATTR bugs I found while working on the
> > > delstid set. Mostly this just ensures that we hold references to the
> > > delegation while working with it.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Applied to nfsd-fixes for v6.11-rc, thanks!
> >
> > [1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
> > commit: 8fceb5f6636bbbf803fe29fff59f138206559964
> > [2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release
> > commit: 8bc97f9b84c8852fcc56be2382f5115c518de785
> >
> > --
> > Chuck Lever
> >
>
> Maybe the following can tidy up that code. I can split this into
> a few separate patches if you like.
> Thoughts?
>
> Note that the patch is easier to review if you apply it then use "git
> diff -b".
>
> NeilBrown
>
>
> From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: untangle code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict()
>
> The code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict() is convoluted and buggy.
>
> With this patch we:
> - properly handle non-nfsd leases. We must not assume flc_owner is a
> delegation unless fl_lmops == &nfsd_lease_mng_ops
AFAICT, non-nfsd leases are already properly handled (though I do agree
that the "flow" of this code is awkward). What case do you see that's
wrong?
> - move the main code out of the for loop
> - have a single exit which calls nfs4_put_stid()
> (and other exits which don't need to call that)
>
> Fixes: c5967721e106 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 2c4b9a22b2bb..7672fa7a70f3 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -8837,6 +8837,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry *dentry,
> struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id);
> struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
> struct file_lock_context *ctx;
> + struct nfs4_delegation *dp = NULL;
> struct nfs4_cb_fattr *ncf;
> struct file_lease *fl;
> struct iattr attrs;
> @@ -8845,77 +8846,76 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry *dentry,
> ctx = locks_inode_context(inode);
> if (!ctx)
> return 0;
> +
> +#define NON_NFSD_LEASE ((void*)1)
> +
> spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> for_each_file_lock(fl, &ctx->flc_lease) {
> - unsigned char type = fl->c.flc_type;
> -
> if (fl->c.flc_flags == FL_LAYOUT)
> continue;
> - if (fl->fl_lmops != &nfsd_lease_mng_ops) {
> - /*
> - * non-nfs lease, if it's a lease with F_RDLCK then
> - * we are done; there isn't any write delegation
> - * on this inode
> - */
> - if (type == F_RDLCK)
> - break;
> - goto break_lease;
> - }
> - if (type == F_WRLCK) {
> - struct nfs4_delegation *dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> -
> - if (dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
> - spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -break_lease:
> - nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
> - dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> - refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
> - ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
> - nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
> - spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> - wait_on_bit_timeout(&ncf->ncf_cb_flags, CB_GETATTR_BUSY,
> - TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFSD_CB_GETATTR_TIMEOUT);
> - if (ncf->ncf_cb_status) {
> - /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
> - status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
> - if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> - !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode)) {
> - nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> - return status;
> - }
> - }
> - if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
> - (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
> - ncf->ncf_cur_fsize != ncf->ncf_cb_fsize))
> - ncf->ncf_file_modified = true;
> - if (ncf->ncf_file_modified) {
> - int err;
> -
> - /*
> - * Per section 10.4.3 of RFC 8881, the server would
> - * not update the file's metadata with the client's
> - * modified size
> - */
> - attrs.ia_mtime = attrs.ia_ctime = current_time(inode);
> - attrs.ia_valid = ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_DELEG;
> - inode_lock(inode);
> - err = notify_change(&nop_mnt_idmap, dentry, &attrs, NULL);
> - inode_unlock(inode);
> - if (err) {
> - nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> - return nfserrno(err);
> - }
> - ncf->ncf_cur_fsize = ncf->ncf_cb_fsize;
> - *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
> - *modified = true;
> - }
> - nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> - return 0;
> + if (fl->c.flc_type == F_WRLCK) {
> + if (fl->fl_lmops == &nfsd_lease_mng_ops)
> + dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> + else
> + dp = NON_NFSD_LEASE;
> }
> break;
> }
> + if (dp == NULL || dp == NON_NFSD_LEASE ||
> + dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
> + spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> + if (dp == NON_NFSD_LEASE) {
> + status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode,
> + NFSD_MAY_READ));
> + if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> + !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
> + return status;
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
> + refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
> + ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
> + nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
> spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> - return 0;
> +
> + wait_on_bit_timeout(&ncf->ncf_cb_flags, CB_GETATTR_BUSY,
> + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFSD_CB_GETATTR_TIMEOUT);
> + if (ncf->ncf_cb_status) {
> + /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
> + status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
> + if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> + !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
> + goto out_status;
> + }
> + if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
> + (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
> + ncf->ncf_cur_fsize != ncf->ncf_cb_fsize))
> + ncf->ncf_file_modified = true;
> + if (ncf->ncf_file_modified) {
> + int err;
> +
> + /*
> + * Per section 10.4.3 of RFC 8881, the server would
> + * not update the file's metadata with the client's
> + * modified size
> + */
> + attrs.ia_mtime = attrs.ia_ctime = current_time(inode);
> + attrs.ia_valid = ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_DELEG;
> + inode_lock(inode);
> + err = notify_change(&nop_mnt_idmap, dentry, &attrs, NULL);
> + inode_unlock(inode);
> + if (err) {
> + status = nfserrno(err);
> + goto out_status;
> + }
> + ncf->ncf_cur_fsize = ncf->ncf_cb_fsize;
> + *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
> + *modified = true;
> + }
> + status = 0;
> +out_status:
> + nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> + return status;
> }
Patch looks like a nice cleanup, but I don't think the Fixes tag is
appropriate here.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes
2024-08-26 14:37 ` Jeff Layton
@ 2024-08-26 14:47 ` Jeff Layton
2024-08-26 15:32 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-08-26 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown, Chuck Lever
Cc: Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 10:37 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 09:22 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Aug 2024, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:27:37PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > Fixes for a couple of CB_GETATTR bugs I found while working on the
> > > > delstid set. Mostly this just ensures that we hold references to the
> > > > delegation while working with it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Applied to nfsd-fixes for v6.11-rc, thanks!
> > >
> > > [1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
> > > commit: 8fceb5f6636bbbf803fe29fff59f138206559964
> > > [2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release
> > > commit: 8bc97f9b84c8852fcc56be2382f5115c518de785
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chuck Lever
> > >
> >
> > Maybe the following can tidy up that code. I can split this into
> > a few separate patches if you like.
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Note that the patch is easier to review if you apply it then use "git
> > diff -b".
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> >
> > From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: untangle code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict()
> >
> > The code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict() is convoluted and buggy.
> >
> > With this patch we:
> > - properly handle non-nfsd leases. We must not assume flc_owner is a
> > delegation unless fl_lmops == &nfsd_lease_mng_ops
>
> AFAICT, non-nfsd leases are already properly handled (though I do agree
> that the "flow" of this code is awkward). What case do you see that's
> wrong?
>
Doh! Nevermind -- I see it now. It looks like the break_lease tag is
just in the wrong place. We should definitely fix that.
In any case, your patch looks reasonable to me, but I couldn't get it
to apply. Care to send a real PATCH instead? It's fine if you want to
drop my patch and just replace it with yours.
> > - move the main code out of the for loop
> > - have a single exit which calls nfs4_put_stid()
> > (and other exits which don't need to call that)
> >
> > Fixes: c5967721e106 ("NFSD: handle GETATTR conflict with write delegation")
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 2c4b9a22b2bb..7672fa7a70f3 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -8837,6 +8837,7 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry *dentry,
> > struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(SVC_NET(rqstp), nfsd_net_id);
> > struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
> > struct file_lock_context *ctx;
> > + struct nfs4_delegation *dp = NULL;
> > struct nfs4_cb_fattr *ncf;
> > struct file_lease *fl;
> > struct iattr attrs;
> > @@ -8845,77 +8846,76 @@ nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct dentry *dentry,
> > ctx = locks_inode_context(inode);
> > if (!ctx)
> > return 0;
> > +
> > +#define NON_NFSD_LEASE ((void*)1)
> > +
> > spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > for_each_file_lock(fl, &ctx->flc_lease) {
> > - unsigned char type = fl->c.flc_type;
> > -
> > if (fl->c.flc_flags == FL_LAYOUT)
> > continue;
> > - if (fl->fl_lmops != &nfsd_lease_mng_ops) {
> > - /*
> > - * non-nfs lease, if it's a lease with F_RDLCK then
> > - * we are done; there isn't any write delegation
> > - * on this inode
> > - */
> > - if (type == F_RDLCK)
> > - break;
> > - goto break_lease;
> > - }
> > - if (type == F_WRLCK) {
> > - struct nfs4_delegation *dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> > -
> > - if (dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
> > - spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > - return 0;
> > - }
> > -break_lease:
> > - nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
> > - dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> > - refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
> > - ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
> > - nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
> > - spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > - wait_on_bit_timeout(&ncf->ncf_cb_flags, CB_GETATTR_BUSY,
> > - TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFSD_CB_GETATTR_TIMEOUT);
> > - if (ncf->ncf_cb_status) {
> > - /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
> > - status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
> > - if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> > - !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode)) {
> > - nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> > - return status;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
> > - (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
> > - ncf->ncf_cur_fsize != ncf->ncf_cb_fsize))
> > - ncf->ncf_file_modified = true;
> > - if (ncf->ncf_file_modified) {
> > - int err;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Per section 10.4.3 of RFC 8881, the server would
> > - * not update the file's metadata with the client's
> > - * modified size
> > - */
> > - attrs.ia_mtime = attrs.ia_ctime = current_time(inode);
> > - attrs.ia_valid = ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_DELEG;
> > - inode_lock(inode);
> > - err = notify_change(&nop_mnt_idmap, dentry, &attrs, NULL);
> > - inode_unlock(inode);
> > - if (err) {
> > - nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> > - return nfserrno(err);
> > - }
> > - ncf->ncf_cur_fsize = ncf->ncf_cb_fsize;
> > - *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
> > - *modified = true;
> > - }
> > - nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> > - return 0;
> > + if (fl->c.flc_type == F_WRLCK) {
> > + if (fl->fl_lmops == &nfsd_lease_mng_ops)
> > + dp = fl->c.flc_owner;
> > + else
> > + dp = NON_NFSD_LEASE;
> > }
> > break;
> > }
> > + if (dp == NULL || dp == NON_NFSD_LEASE ||
> > + dp->dl_recall.cb_clp == *(rqstp->rq_lease_breaker)) {
> > + spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > + if (dp == NON_NFSD_LEASE) {
> > + status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode,
> > + NFSD_MAY_READ));
> > + if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> > + !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
> > + return status;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + nfsd_stats_wdeleg_getattr_inc(nn);
> > + refcount_inc(&dp->dl_stid.sc_count);
> > + ncf = &dp->dl_cb_fattr;
> > + nfs4_cb_getattr(&dp->dl_cb_fattr);
> > spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
> > - return 0;
> > +
> > + wait_on_bit_timeout(&ncf->ncf_cb_flags, CB_GETATTR_BUSY,
> > + TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, NFSD_CB_GETATTR_TIMEOUT);
> > + if (ncf->ncf_cb_status) {
> > + /* Recall delegation only if client didn't respond */
> > + status = nfserrno(nfsd_open_break_lease(inode, NFSD_MAY_READ));
> > + if (status != nfserr_jukebox ||
> > + !nfsd_wait_for_delegreturn(rqstp, inode))
> > + goto out_status;
> > + }
> > + if (!ncf->ncf_file_modified &&
> > + (ncf->ncf_initial_cinfo != ncf->ncf_cb_change ||
> > + ncf->ncf_cur_fsize != ncf->ncf_cb_fsize))
> > + ncf->ncf_file_modified = true;
> > + if (ncf->ncf_file_modified) {
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Per section 10.4.3 of RFC 8881, the server would
> > + * not update the file's metadata with the client's
> > + * modified size
> > + */
> > + attrs.ia_mtime = attrs.ia_ctime = current_time(inode);
> > + attrs.ia_valid = ATTR_MTIME | ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_DELEG;
> > + inode_lock(inode);
> > + err = notify_change(&nop_mnt_idmap, dentry, &attrs, NULL);
> > + inode_unlock(inode);
> > + if (err) {
> > + status = nfserrno(err);
> > + goto out_status;
> > + }
> > + ncf->ncf_cur_fsize = ncf->ncf_cb_fsize;
> > + *size = ncf->ncf_cur_fsize;
> > + *modified = true;
> > + }
> > + status = 0;
> > +out_status:
> > + nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
> > + return status;
> > }
>
> Patch looks like a nice cleanup, but I don't think the Fixes tag is
> appropriate here.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes
2024-08-26 14:47 ` Jeff Layton
@ 2024-08-26 15:32 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2024-08-26 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neil Brown, Jeff Layton
Cc: NeilBrown, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 10:47:46AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 10:37 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 09:22 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2024, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 06:27:37PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > > Fixes for a couple of CB_GETATTR bugs I found while working on the
> > > > > delstid set. Mostly this just ensures that we hold references to the
> > > > > delegation while working with it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Applied to nfsd-fixes for v6.11-rc, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > [1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr
> > > > commit: 8fceb5f6636bbbf803fe29fff59f138206559964
> > > > [2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release
> > > > commit: 8bc97f9b84c8852fcc56be2382f5115c518de785
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Chuck Lever
> > > >
> > >
> > > Maybe the following can tidy up that code. I can split this into
> > > a few separate patches if you like.
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Note that the patch is easier to review if you apply it then use "git
> > > diff -b".
> > >
> > > NeilBrown
> > >
> > >
> > > From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
> > > Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: untangle code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict()
> > >
> > > The code in nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict() is convoluted and buggy.
> > >
> > > With this patch we:
> > > - properly handle non-nfsd leases. We must not assume flc_owner is a
> > > delegation unless fl_lmops == &nfsd_lease_mng_ops
> >
> > AFAICT, non-nfsd leases are already properly handled (though I do agree
> > that the "flow" of this code is awkward). What case do you see that's
> > wrong?
> >
>
> Doh! Nevermind -- I see it now. It looks like the break_lease tag is
> just in the wrong place. We should definitely fix that.
>
> In any case, your patch looks reasonable to me, but I couldn't get it
> to apply.
I applied Jeff's weekend CB_GETATTR patches to nfsd-fixes. If
there's an additional bug fix carried in Neil's clean-up, I would
like that to apply to that branch, as a small surgical fix, so it
can go into v6.11-rc.
Seems like these CB_GETATTR fixes need to be applicable to LTS
kernels, so let's keep them narrow.
> Care to send a real PATCH instead? It's fine if you want to
> drop my patch and just replace it with yours.
Neil, I'd prefer:
1) specific fixes to apply to the nfsd-fixes branch
2) larger clean-ups to apply to the nfsd-next branch
Untangling nfsd4_deleg_getattr_conflict() is a sensible thing to do,
IMO, but I'd bet that Linus would consider that development rather
than an urgent bug fix.
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-26 15:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-08-23 22:27 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Jeff Layton
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: hold reference to delegation when updating it for cb_getattr Jeff Layton
2024-08-24 15:03 ` Chuck Lever
2024-08-24 16:39 ` Jeff Layton
2024-08-23 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: fix potential UAF in nfsd4_cb_getattr_release Jeff Layton
2024-08-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] nfsd: CB_GETATTR fixes Chuck Lever
2024-08-25 23:22 ` NeilBrown
2024-08-26 14:37 ` Jeff Layton
2024-08-26 14:47 ` Jeff Layton
2024-08-26 15:32 ` Chuck Lever
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).