From: cel@kernel.org
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
lilingfeng3@huawei.com, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 6.1.y 6/7] nfsd: don't call locks_release_private() twice concurrently
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 11:07:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240826150703.13987-7-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240826150703.13987-1-cel@kernel.org>
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
[ Upstream commit 05eda6e75773592760285e10ac86c56d683be17f ]
It is possible for free_blocked_lock() to be called twice concurrently,
once from nfsd4_lock() and once from nfsd4_release_lockowner() calling
remove_blocked_locks(). This is why a kref was added.
It is perfectly safe for locks_delete_block() and kref_put() to be
called in parallel as they use locking or atomicity respectively as
protection. However locks_release_private() has no locking. It is
safe for it to be called twice sequentially, but not concurrently.
This patch moves that call from free_blocked_lock() where it could race
with itself, to free_nbl() where it cannot. This will slightly delay
the freeing of private info or release of the owner - but not by much.
It is arguably more natural for this freeing to happen in free_nbl()
where the structure itself is freed.
This bug was found by code inspection - it has not been seen in practice.
Fixes: 47446d74f170 ("nfsd4: add refcount for nfsd4_blocked_lock")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 8d15959004ad..f04de2553c90 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ free_nbl(struct kref *kref)
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl;
nbl = container_of(kref, struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_kref);
+ locks_release_private(&nbl->nbl_lock);
kfree(nbl);
}
@@ -325,7 +326,6 @@ static void
free_blocked_lock(struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl)
{
locks_delete_block(&nbl->nbl_lock);
- locks_release_private(&nbl->nbl_lock);
kref_put(&nbl->nbl_kref, free_nbl);
}
--
2.45.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-26 15:06 [PATCH 6.1.y 0/7] NFSD updates for LTS 6.1.y cel
2024-08-26 15:06 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 1/7] nfsd: Simplify code around svc_exit_thread() call in nfsd() cel
2024-08-26 15:06 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 2/7] nfsd: separate nfsd_last_thread() from nfsd_put() cel
2024-08-26 15:06 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 3/7] NFSD: simplify error paths in nfsd_svc() cel
2024-08-26 15:07 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 4/7] nfsd: call nfsd_last_thread() before final nfsd_put() cel
2024-08-26 15:07 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 5/7] nfsd: drop the nfsd_put helper cel
2024-08-26 15:07 ` cel [this message]
2024-08-26 15:07 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 7/7] nfsd: Fix a regression in nfsd_setattr() cel
2024-08-27 12:47 ` [PATCH 6.1.y 0/7] NFSD updates for LTS 6.1.y Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240826150703.13987-7-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=lilingfeng3@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox