From: cel@kernel.org
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] NFSD: Replace use of NFSD_MAY_LOCK in nfsd4_lock()
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:02:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241013200227.170049-2-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
NFSv4 LOCK operations should not avoid the set of authorization
checks that apply to all other NFSv4 operations. Also, the
"no_auth_nlm" export option should apply only to NLM LOCK requests.
It's not necessary or sensible to apply it to NFSv4 LOCK operations.
Instead, set no permission bits when calling fh_verify(). Subsequent
stateid processing handles authorization checks.
Reported-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
This passes the nfstest lock tests and the git regression tests.
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 73c4b983c048..b6f395927aca 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -7964,11 +7964,9 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
if (check_lock_length(lock->lk_offset, lock->lk_length))
return nfserr_inval;
- if ((status = fh_verify(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh,
- S_IFREG, NFSD_MAY_LOCK))) {
- dprintk("NFSD: nfsd4_lock: permission denied!\n");
+ status = fh_verify(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh, S_IFREG, 0);
+ if (status != nfs_ok)
return status;
- }
sb = cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry->d_sb;
if (lock->lk_is_new) {
--
2.46.2
reply other threads:[~2024-10-13 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241013200227.170049-2-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox