From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: return hard failure for OP_SETCLIENTID when there are too many clients.
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:37:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241023024222.691745-3-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241023024222.691745-1-neilb@suse.de>
If there are more non-courteous clients than the calculated limit, we
should fail the request rather than report a soft failure and
encouraging the client to retry indefinitely.
The only hard failure allowed for EXCHANGE_ID that doesn't clearly have
some other meaning is NFS4ERR_SERVERFAULT. So use that, but explain why
in a comment at each place that it is returned.
If there are courteous clients which push us over the limit, then expedite
their removal.
This is not known to have caused a problem is production use, but
testing of lots of clients reports repeated NFS4ERR_DELAY responses
which doesn't seem helpful.
Also remove an outdated comment - we do use a slab cache.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 56b261608af4..ca6b5b52f77d 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -2212,21 +2212,20 @@ STALE_CLIENTID(clientid_t *clid, struct nfsd_net *nn)
return 1;
}
-/*
- * XXX Should we use a slab cache ?
- * This type of memory management is somewhat inefficient, but we use it
- * anyway since SETCLIENTID is not a common operation.
- */
static struct nfs4_client *alloc_client(struct xdr_netobj name,
struct nfsd_net *nn)
{
struct nfs4_client *clp;
int i;
- if (atomic_read(&nn->nfs4_client_count) >= nn->nfs4_max_clients) {
+ if (atomic_read(&nn->nfs4_client_count) -
+ atomic_read(&nn->nfsd_courtesy_clients) >= nn->nfs4_max_clients)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EUSERS);
+
+ if (atomic_read(&nn->nfs4_client_count) >= nn->nfs4_max_clients &&
+ atomic_read(&nn->nfsd_courtesy_clients) > 0)
mod_delayed_work(laundry_wq, &nn->laundromat_work, 0);
- return NULL;
- }
+
clp = kmem_cache_zalloc(client_slab, GFP_KERNEL);
if (clp == NULL)
return NULL;
@@ -3121,8 +3120,8 @@ static struct nfs4_client *create_client(struct xdr_netobj name,
struct dentry *dentries[ARRAY_SIZE(client_files)];
clp = alloc_client(name, nn);
- if (clp == NULL)
- return NULL;
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clp))
+ return clp;
ret = copy_cred(&clp->cl_cred, &rqstp->rq_cred);
if (ret) {
@@ -3504,6 +3503,11 @@ nfsd4_exchange_id(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
new = create_client(exid->clname, rqstp, &verf);
if (new == NULL)
return nfserr_jukebox;
+ if (IS_ERR(new))
+ /* Protocol has no specific error for "client limit reached".
+ * NFS4ERR_RESOURCE is not permitted for EXCHANGE_ID
+ */
+ return nfserr_serverfault;
status = copy_impl_id(new, exid);
if (status)
goto out_nolock;
@@ -4422,6 +4426,12 @@ nfsd4_setclientid(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
new = create_client(clname, rqstp, &clverifier);
if (new == NULL)
return nfserr_jukebox;
+ if (IS_ERR(new))
+ /* Protocol has no specific error for "client limit reached".
+ * NFS4ERR_RESOURCE, while allowed for SETCLIENTID, implies
+ * that a smaller COMPOUND might be successful.
+ */
+ return nfserr_serverfault;
spin_lock(&nn->client_lock);
conf = find_confirmed_client_by_name(&clname, nn);
if (conf && client_has_state(conf)) {
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-23 2:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 2:37 [PATCH 0/6] prepare for dynamic server thread management NeilBrown
2024-10-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] SUNRPC: move nrthreads counting to start/stop threads NeilBrown
2024-10-23 2:37 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2024-10-23 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: return hard failure for OP_SETCLIENTID when there are too many clients Chuck Lever
2024-10-23 21:47 ` NeilBrown
2024-10-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] nfs: dynamically adjust per-client DRC slot limits NeilBrown
2024-10-23 11:48 ` Jeff Layton
2024-10-23 13:55 ` Chuck Lever
2024-10-23 16:34 ` Tom Talpey
2024-10-23 21:53 ` NeilBrown
2024-10-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] nfsd: don't use sv_nrthreads in connection limiting calculations NeilBrown
2024-10-23 12:08 ` Jeff Layton
2024-10-23 21:18 ` NeilBrown
2024-10-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 5/6] sunrpc: remove all connection limit configuration NeilBrown
2024-10-23 12:50 ` Jeff Layton
2024-10-23 2:37 ` [PATCH 6/6] sunrpc: introduce possibility that requested number of threads is different from actual NeilBrown
2024-10-23 13:32 ` Jeff Layton
2024-10-30 6:35 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-23 14:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] prepare for dynamic server thread management Chuck Lever
2025-10-28 15:47 ` Jeff Layton
2025-10-28 22:36 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241023024222.691745-3-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kolga@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox