public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cel@kernel.org
To: Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 6/7] NFS: Use NFSv4.2's OFFLOAD_STATUS operation
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2024 11:29:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241203162908.302354-15-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241203162908.302354-9-cel@kernel.org>

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

We've found that there are cases where a transport disconnection
results in the loss of callback RPCs. NFS servers typically do not
retransmit callback operations after a disconnect.

This can be a problem for the Linux NFS client's current
implementation of asynchronous COPY, which waits indefinitely for a
CB_OFFLOAD callback. If a transport disconnect occurs while an async
COPY is running, there's a good chance the client will never get the
completing CB_OFFLOAD.

Fix this by implementing the OFFLOAD_STATUS operation so that the
Linux NFS client can probe the NFS server if it doesn't see a
CB_OFFLOAD in a reasonable amount of time.

This patch implements a simplistic check. As future work, the client
might also be able to detect whether there is no forward progress on
the request asynchronous COPY operation, and CANCEL it.

Suggested-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218735
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
index fa180ce7c803..5f2bfca00416 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
@@ -175,6 +175,25 @@ int nfs42_proc_deallocate(struct file *filep, loff_t offset, loff_t len)
 	return err;
 }
 
+/* Wait this long before checking progress on a COPY operation */
+enum {
+	NFS42_COPY_TIMEOUT	= 3 * HZ,
+};
+
+static void nfs4_copy_dequeue_callback(struct nfs_server *dst_server,
+				       struct nfs_server *src_server,
+				       struct nfs4_copy_state *copy)
+{
+	spin_lock(&dst_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
+	list_del_init(&copy->copies);
+	spin_unlock(&dst_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
+	if (dst_server != src_server) {
+		spin_lock(&src_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
+		list_del_init(&copy->src_copies);
+		spin_unlock(&src_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
+	}
+}
+
 static int handle_async_copy(struct nfs42_copy_res *res,
 			     struct nfs_server *dst_server,
 			     struct nfs_server *src_server,
@@ -184,9 +203,10 @@ static int handle_async_copy(struct nfs42_copy_res *res,
 			     bool *restart)
 {
 	struct nfs4_copy_state *copy, *tmp_copy = NULL, *iter;
-	int status = NFS4_OK;
 	struct nfs_open_context *dst_ctx = nfs_file_open_context(dst);
 	struct nfs_open_context *src_ctx = nfs_file_open_context(src);
+	int status = NFS4_OK;
+	u64 copied;
 
 	copy = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nfs4_copy_state), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!copy)
@@ -224,15 +244,12 @@ static int handle_async_copy(struct nfs42_copy_res *res,
 		spin_unlock(&src_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
 	}
 
-	status = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&copy->completion);
-	spin_lock(&dst_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
-	list_del_init(&copy->copies);
-	spin_unlock(&dst_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
-	if (dst_server != src_server) {
-		spin_lock(&src_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
-		list_del_init(&copy->src_copies);
-		spin_unlock(&src_server->nfs_client->cl_lock);
-	}
+wait:
+	status = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&copy->completion,
+							   NFS42_COPY_TIMEOUT);
+	if (!status)
+		goto timeout;
+	nfs4_copy_dequeue_callback(dst_server, src_server, copy);
 	if (status == -ERESTARTSYS) {
 		goto out_cancel;
 	} else if (copy->flags || copy->error == NFS4ERR_PARTNER_NO_AUTH) {
@@ -242,6 +259,7 @@ static int handle_async_copy(struct nfs42_copy_res *res,
 	}
 out:
 	res->write_res.count = copy->count;
+	/* Copy out the updated write verifier provided by CB_OFFLOAD. */
 	memcpy(&res->write_res.verifier, &copy->verf, sizeof(copy->verf));
 	status = -copy->error;
 
@@ -253,6 +271,36 @@ static int handle_async_copy(struct nfs42_copy_res *res,
 	if (!nfs42_files_from_same_server(src, dst))
 		nfs42_do_offload_cancel_async(src, src_stateid);
 	goto out_free;
+timeout:
+	status = nfs42_proc_offload_status(dst, &copy->stateid, &copied);
+	if (status == -EINPROGRESS)
+		goto wait;
+	nfs4_copy_dequeue_callback(dst_server, src_server, copy);
+	switch (status) {
+	case 0:
+		/* The server recognized the copy stateid, so it hasn't
+		 * rebooted. Don't overwrite the verifier returned in the
+		 * COPY result. */
+		res->write_res.count = copied;
+		goto out_free;
+	case -EREMOTEIO:
+		/* COPY operation failed on the server. */
+		status = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		res->write_res.count = copied;
+		goto out_free;
+	case -EBADF:
+		/* Server did not recognize the copy stateid. It has
+		 * probably restarted and lost the plot. */
+		res->write_res.count = 0;
+		status = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		break;
+	case -EOPNOTSUPP:
+		/* RFC 7862 REQUIREs server to support OFFLOAD_STATUS when
+		 * it has signed up for an async COPY, so server is not
+		 * spec-compliant. */
+		res->write_res.count = 0;
+	}
+	goto out_free;
 }
 
 static int process_copy_commit(struct file *dst, loff_t pos_dst,
-- 
2.47.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-12-03 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-03 16:29 [PATCH v1 0/7] Client-side OFFLOAD_STATUS implementation cel
2024-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] NFS: CB_OFFLOAD can return NFS4ERR_DELAY cel
2024-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] NFS: Fix typo in OFFLOAD_CANCEL comment cel
2024-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] NFS: Rename struct nfs4_offloadcancel_data cel
2024-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] NFS: Implement NFSv4.2's OFFLOAD_STATUS XDR cel
2024-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] NFS: Implement NFSv4.2's OFFLOAD_STATUS operation cel
2024-12-13  0:39   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2024-12-13 18:40     ` Chuck Lever
2024-12-03 16:29 ` cel [this message]
2024-12-03 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] NFS: Refactor trace_nfs4_offload_cancel cel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241203162908.302354-15-cel@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=kolga@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox