From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] sunrpc: remove explicit barrier from rpc_make_runnable()
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 13:15:27 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241206021830.3526922-2-neilb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241206021830.3526922-1-neilb@suse.de>
The wake_up_bit() interface is fragile as a barrier is often required
as is present here. clear_and_wake_up_bit() is a more robust interface
as it includes the barrier and is appropriate here.
This patch rearranges the code slightly and makes use of
clear_and_wake_up_bit(). This removes some of the need to understand
barriers.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h | 2 ++
net/sunrpc/sched.c | 13 +++++--------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
index fec1e8a1570c..76e1c0194376 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/sched.h
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ enum {
#define RPC_IS_QUEUED(t) test_bit(RPC_TASK_QUEUED, &(t)->tk_runstate)
#define rpc_set_queued(t) set_bit(RPC_TASK_QUEUED, &(t)->tk_runstate)
#define rpc_clear_queued(t) clear_bit(RPC_TASK_QUEUED, &(t)->tk_runstate)
+#define rpc_clear_and_wake_queued(t) clear_and_wake_up_bit(RPC_TASK_QUEUED, \
+ &(t)->tk_runstate)
#define RPC_IS_ACTIVATED(t) test_bit(RPC_TASK_ACTIVE, &(t)->tk_runstate)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
index cef623ea1506..1b710ffc7ad6 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
@@ -361,17 +361,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpc_wait_for_completion_task);
static void rpc_make_runnable(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct rpc_task *task)
{
- bool need_wakeup = !rpc_test_and_set_running(task);
-
- rpc_clear_queued(task);
- if (!need_wakeup)
- return;
- if (RPC_IS_ASYNC(task)) {
+ if (rpc_test_and_set_running(task))
+ rpc_clear_queued(task);
+ else if (RPC_IS_ASYNC(task)) {
+ rpc_clear_queued(task);
INIT_WORK(&task->u.tk_work, rpc_async_schedule);
queue_work(wq, &task->u.tk_work);
} else {
- smp_mb__after_atomic();
- wake_up_bit(&task->tk_runstate, RPC_TASK_QUEUED);
+ rpc_clear_and_wake_queued(task);
}
}
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-06 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-06 2:15 [PATCH 00/11] nfs: improve use of wake_up_bit and wake_up_var NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 02/11] sunrpc: use clear_and_wake_up_bit() for XPRT_LOCKED NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 03/11] nfs: use clear_and_wake_up_bit() NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 04/11] nfs: combine NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN and NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN_LOCK NeilBrown
2025-01-22 20:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2025-01-22 21:25 ` NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 05/11] nfs: use clear_and_wake_up_bit() in pnfs code NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 06/11] nfs: use store_release_wake_up() for clearing d_fsdata NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 07/11] sunrpc: discard rpc_wait_bit_killable() NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 08/11] nfs: discard nfs_wait_bit_killable() NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 09/11] nfs: add memory barrier before calling wake_up_var on cl_state NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 10/11] nfs: use atomic_dec_and_wake_up() NeilBrown
2024-12-06 2:15 ` [PATCH 11/11] nfs: use wait_var_event_spinlock() to wait for nfsi->layout to change NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241206021830.3526922-2-neilb@suse.de \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox