From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE2E71D222B for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734380826; cv=none; b=gjMLS6xmYr4G9McspHAmuagCZIGERmGwMz0gy3oQrfoReZD+wllfL1b3R0D9meowUhZiPPhk6u9VBezB5fPlVg33xuHmgHGSBF+dVpB/pNCh6Guq0vVqeutMRXU52k8tdPPlH4vfL3eKte/AIQNVQ3KfwbnzD+dFI0kGeFTtWfo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734380826; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wba3CXo4CZOjc8RnTFUlImUR6VFEhddm9QLf7Y+unTA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=nNgSGfmqbcvDrKOqVuiXgE3jzSY3Q+7WaeeeASn7dHdnJ2JGPuYVMdP4HZ5UNMRBHRxr6eZ5WejDGNX0Rj5CGjCebarrc6dscQyO1mnVWWrFojm3ZyXJHnOp39MvdTu8tgtoUDl0VDJ7h8k3AqE4tRdbngWJdS99TurAPNL1mR8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=j+Q916uK; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=BKxTf4zv; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=j+Q916uK; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b=BKxTf4zv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="j+Q916uK"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="BKxTf4zv"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="j+Q916uK"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="BKxTf4zv" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB5C11F37E; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:27:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1734380821; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=sZkiaJq7Uda+CtgrGzlKCQgA6idz50G6sd2iF63F3CY=; b=j+Q916uK7LBI3dtj3AFPK4IaYdSgKoFFgkI/L9SUhT4cSDGkew3d/BR7HhWiwwQdfkgXIJ Jb+0Ra3cwfJF2TLheomO/e41nyCE3yGU754C5vdu2H2+qwdLdnZqjlIQB0kCobDO/S+i14 sak7SmpYpK8wSAyWaMdFE7IyfJhZ4vA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1734380821; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=sZkiaJq7Uda+CtgrGzlKCQgA6idz50G6sd2iF63F3CY=; b=BKxTf4zvQPnbRzbV0EPjSvI7Yu5qCNpMMoK4T1ZZ9lVn6VU3qCMyYnqHnZz2sHbYl0K10v gOyBvDh/h+d3mQCQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1734380821; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=sZkiaJq7Uda+CtgrGzlKCQgA6idz50G6sd2iF63F3CY=; b=j+Q916uK7LBI3dtj3AFPK4IaYdSgKoFFgkI/L9SUhT4cSDGkew3d/BR7HhWiwwQdfkgXIJ Jb+0Ra3cwfJF2TLheomO/e41nyCE3yGU754C5vdu2H2+qwdLdnZqjlIQB0kCobDO/S+i14 sak7SmpYpK8wSAyWaMdFE7IyfJhZ4vA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1734380821; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=sZkiaJq7Uda+CtgrGzlKCQgA6idz50G6sd2iF63F3CY=; b=BKxTf4zvQPnbRzbV0EPjSvI7Yu5qCNpMMoK4T1ZZ9lVn6VU3qCMyYnqHnZz2sHbYl0K10v gOyBvDh/h+d3mQCQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565A1137CF; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id bGMsCBWNYGf6XwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 16 Dec 2024 20:27:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:26:54 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: NeilBrown , Steve Dickson , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Abstract address for rpcbind in kernel not working Message-ID: <20241216202654.GA619856@pevik> Reply-To: Petr Vorel Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -3.50 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.cz:replyto]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Level: Hi Neil, Steve, some time ago I reported a problem with nfslock01.sh test on NFSv3 [1]. Neil send various fixes to support abstract address for rpcbind in kernel: * kernel [2] released in v6.5-rc1 as: 4388ce05fa38 ("SUNRPC: support abstract unix socket addresses") 626590ea4c93 ("SUNRPC: attempt to reach rpcbind with an abstract socket name") * libtirpc [3] released in 1.3.5 d4d6c80 ("Allow working with abstract AF_UNIX addresses.") 33c687b ("Change local_rpcb() to take a targaddr pointer.") d68523a ("Try using a new abstract address when connecting to rpcbind") * rpcbind [4] released in 1.2.7 4e1f1b2 ("rpcinfo: try connecting using abstract address.") 652aa9a ("Listen on an AF_UNIX abstract address if supported.") NOTE: these 2 patches were never merged [PATCH 1/4] anpage: describe use of extra port for broadcast rpc [5] [PATCH 2/4] rpcbind: allow broadcast RPC to be disabled. [6] But when testing nfslock01.sh with: $ rpm -q -e libtirpc3 -e rpcbind libtirpc3-1.3.6-1.1.x86_64 rpcbind-1.2.7-1.1.x86_64 $ uname -a Linux ts 6.13.0-rc1-1.g492f944-default #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Dec 2 08:55:00 UTC 2024 (492f944) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux it's still not working. Any hint what's wrong? Kind regards, Petr dmesg: [501926.369717] [ T28210] lockd: cannot monitor 10.0.0.2 [501926.372490] [ T28211] lockd: cannot monitor 10.0.0.2 $ cat /usr/lib/systemd/system/rpcbind.socket [Unit] Description=RPCbind Server Activation Socket DefaultDependencies=no Wants=rpcbind.target Before=rpcbind.target [Socket] ListenStream=/run/rpcbind.sock ListenStream=@/run/rpcbind.sock # RPC netconfig can't handle ipv6/ipv4 dual sockets BindIPv6Only=ipv6-only ListenStream=0.0.0.0:111 ListenDatagram=0.0.0.0:111 ListenStream=[::]:111 ListenDatagram=[::]:111 [Install] WantedBy=sockets.target # PATH="/opt/ltp/testcases/bin:$PATH" nfslock01.sh -v 3 -t tcp nfslock01 1 TINFO: Running: nfslock01.sh -v 3 -t tcp nfslock01 1 TINFO: Tested kernel: Linux ts 6.13.0-rc1-1.g492f944-default #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Dec 2 08:55:00 UTC 2024 (492f944) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux nfslock01 1 TINFO: initialize 'lhost' 'ltp_ns_veth2' interface nfslock01 1 TINFO: add local addr 10.0.0.2/24 nfslock01 1 TINFO: add local addr fd00:1:1:1::2/64 nfslock01 1 TINFO: initialize 'rhost' 'ltp_ns_veth1' interface nfslock01 1 TINFO: add remote addr 10.0.0.1/24 nfslock01 1 TINFO: add remote addr fd00:1:1:1::1/64 nfslock01 1 TINFO: Network config (local -- remote): nfslock01 1 TINFO: ltp_ns_veth2 -- ltp_ns_veth1 nfslock01 1 TINFO: 10.0.0.2/24 -- 10.0.0.1/24 nfslock01 1 TINFO: fd00:1:1:1::2/64 -- fd00:1:1:1::1/64 nfslock01 1 TINFO: Using /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN as tmpdir (tmpfs filesystem) tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0' tst_supported_fs_types.c:169: TINFO: Skipping ext2 as requested by the test tst_supported_fs_types.c:169: TINFO: Skipping ext3 as requested by the test tst_supported_fs_types.c:97: TINFO: Kernel supports ext4 tst_supported_fs_types.c:62: TINFO: mkfs.ext4 does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:97: TINFO: Kernel supports xfs tst_supported_fs_types.c:62: TINFO: mkfs.xfs does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:97: TINFO: Kernel supports btrfs tst_supported_fs_types.c:62: TINFO: mkfs.btrfs does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:97: TINFO: Kernel supports bcachefs tst_supported_fs_types.c:62: TINFO: mkfs.bcachefs does exist tst_supported_fs_types.c:169: TINFO: Skipping vfat as requested by the test tst_supported_fs_types.c:169: TINFO: Skipping exfat as requested by the test tst_supported_fs_types.c:169: TINFO: Skipping ntfs as requested by the test tst_supported_fs_types.c:169: TINFO: Skipping tmpfs as requested by the test nfslock01 1 TINFO: === Testing on ext4 === nfslock01 1 TINFO: Formatting ext4 with opts='/dev/loop0' nfslock01 1 TINFO: Mounting device: mount -t ext4 /dev/loop0 /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint nfslock01 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s nfslock01 1 TINFO: mount.nfs: (linux nfs-utils 2.6.4) nfslock01 1 TINFO: setup NFSv3, socket type tcp nfslock01 1 TINFO: Mounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 1 TINFO: Mounting NFS: mount -v -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=3 10.0.0.2:/tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint/3/tcp /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 1 TINFO: creating test files (chars: 64, lines: 16384) nfslock01 1 TINFO: Testing locking nfslock01 1 TINFO: locking 'flock_idata' file and writing data nfslock01 1 failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 TINFO: waiting for pids: 27919 27920 failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 nfslock01 1 TFAIL: nfs_lock process failed nfslock01 2 TINFO: Cleaning up testcase nfslock01 2 TINFO: Unmounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 2 TINFO: === Testing on xfs === nfslock01 2 TINFO: Formatting xfs with opts='/dev/loop0' nfslock01 2 TINFO: Mounting device: mount -t xfs /dev/loop0 /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint nfslock01 2 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s nfslock01 2 TINFO: mount.nfs: (linux nfs-utils 2.6.4) nfslock01 2 TINFO: setup NFSv3, socket type tcp nfslock01 2 TINFO: Mounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 2 TINFO: Mounting NFS: mount -v -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=3 10.0.0.2:/tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint/3/tcp /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 2 TINFO: creating test files (chars: 64, lines: 16384) nfslock01 2 TINFO: Testing locking nfslock01 2 TINFO: locking 'flock_idata' file and writing data nfslock01 2 failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 TINFO: waiting for pids: 28005 28006 nfslock01 2 TFAIL: failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 nfs_lock process failed nfslock01 3 TINFO: Cleaning up testcase nfslock01 3 TINFO: Unmounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 3 TINFO: === Testing on btrfs === nfslock01 3 TINFO: Formatting btrfs with opts='/dev/loop0' nfslock01 3 TINFO: Mounting device: mount -t btrfs /dev/loop0 /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint nfslock01 3 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s nfslock01 3 TINFO: mount.nfs: (linux nfs-utils 2.6.4) nfslock01 3 TINFO: setup NFSv3, socket type tcp nfslock01 3 TINFO: Mounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 3 TINFO: Mounting NFS: mount -v -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=3 10.0.0.2:/tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint/3/tcp /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 3 TINFO: creating test files (chars: 64, lines: 16384) nfslock01 3 TINFO: Testing locking nfslock01 3 TINFO: locking 'flock_idata' file and writing data nfslock01 3 TINFO: waiting for pids: 28103 28104 failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 nfslock01 3 TFAIL: nfs_lock process failed nfslock01 4 TINFO: Cleaning up testcase nfslock01 4 TINFO: Unmounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 4 TINFO: === Testing on bcachefs === nfslock01 4 TINFO: Formatting bcachefs with opts='/dev/loop0' nfslock01 4 TINFO: Mounting device: mount -t bcachefs /dev/loop0 /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint nfslock01 4 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s nfslock01 4 TINFO: mount.nfs: (linux nfs-utils 2.6.4) nfslock01 4 TINFO: setup NFSv3, socket type tcp nfslock01 4 TINFO: Mounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 4 TINFO: Mounting NFS: mount -v -t nfs -o proto=tcp,vers=3 10.0.0.2:/tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/mntpoint/3/tcp /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 4 TINFO: creating test files (chars: 64, lines: 16384) nfslock01 4 TINFO: Testing locking nfslock01 4 TINFO: locking 'flock_idata' file and writing data nfslock01 4 TINFO: failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 failed in writeb_lock, errno = 37 waiting for pids: 28210 28211 nfslock01 4 TFAIL: nfs_lock process failed nfslock01 5 TINFO: Cleaning up testcase nfslock01 5 TINFO: Unmounting /tmp/LTP_nfslock01.cXBE0JezwN/3/0 nfslock01 5 TINFO: AppArmor enabled, this may affect test results nfslock01 5 TINFO: it can be disabled with TST_DISABLE_APPARMOR=1 (requires super/root) nfslock01 5 TINFO: loaded AppArmor profiles: none Summary: passed 0 failed 4 broken 0 skipped 0 warnings 0 [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20230502075921.3614794-1-pvorel@suse.cz/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/168375610447.26246.3237443941479930060.stgit@noble.brown/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240311014327.19692-1-neilb@suse.de/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240225235628.12473-1-neilb@suse.de/ [5] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240225235628.12473-2-neilb@suse.de/ [6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/20240225235628.12473-3-neilb@suse.de/