From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3} Change ->mkdir() and vfs_mkdir() to return a dentry
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 06:33:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214063306.GD1977892@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214061355.GC1977892@ZenIV>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:13:55AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:00:39AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > 3) I'm pretty sure that NFS is *not* the only filesystem that returns
> > unhashed negative in some success cases; will need to go over the instances
> > to verify that, though.
>
> Definitely so: in cifs_mkdir() we have
> if ((server->ops->posix_mkdir) && (tcon->posix_extensions)) {
> rc = server->ops->posix_mkdir(xid, inode, mode, tcon, full_path,
> cifs_sb);
> d_drop(direntry); /* for time being always refresh inode info */
> goto mkdir_out;
> }
> There might be other cases. hostfs is definitely like that, I'm pretty
> sure that kernfs is as well...
kernfs is actually playing fast and loose with the calling conventions there;
it does not bother with unhashing and relies upon its ->d_revalidate()
noticing and unhashing the sucker.
Another variant that would work (and follow the calling conventions)
is to have ->lookup() that leaves negatives unhashed and ->mkdir()
not bothering to hash or instantiate.
It really needs a review instance by instance.
And yes, it does look like ->lookup()-like calling conventions end up better,
especially if we make an instance return d_splice_alias() result...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-14 5:16 [PATCH 0/3} Change ->mkdir() and vfs_mkdir() to return a dentry NeilBrown
2025-02-14 5:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] Change inode_operations.mkdir to return struct dentry * NeilBrown
2025-02-15 8:09 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-17 15:58 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-14 5:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfs: change mkdir inode_operation to return alternate dentry if needed NeilBrown
2025-02-14 5:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] VFS: Change vfs_mkdir() to return the dentry NeilBrown
2025-02-15 4:10 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-15 6:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-02-14 6:00 ` [PATCH 0/3} Change ->mkdir() and vfs_mkdir() to return a dentry Al Viro
2025-02-14 6:13 ` Al Viro
2025-02-14 6:33 ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-02-17 3:53 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250214063306.GD1977892@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox