public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3} Change ->mkdir() and vfs_mkdir() to return a dentry
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 06:33:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214063306.GD1977892@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214061355.GC1977892@ZenIV>

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:13:55AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:00:39AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > 3) I'm pretty sure that NFS is *not* the only filesystem that returns
> > unhashed negative in some success cases; will need to go over the instances
> > to verify that, though.
> 
> Definitely so: in cifs_mkdir() we have
>         if ((server->ops->posix_mkdir) && (tcon->posix_extensions)) {
>                 rc = server->ops->posix_mkdir(xid, inode, mode, tcon, full_path,
>                                               cifs_sb);
>                 d_drop(direntry); /* for time being always refresh inode info */
>                 goto mkdir_out;
>         }
> There might be other cases.  hostfs is definitely like that, I'm pretty
> sure that kernfs is as well...

kernfs is actually playing fast and loose with the calling conventions there;
it does not bother with unhashing and relies upon its ->d_revalidate()
noticing and unhashing the sucker.

Another variant that would work (and follow the calling conventions)
is to have ->lookup() that leaves negatives unhashed and ->mkdir()
not bothering to hash or instantiate.

It really needs a review instance by instance.

And yes, it does look like ->lookup()-like calling conventions end up better,
especially if we make an instance return d_splice_alias() result...

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-14  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14  5:16 [PATCH 0/3} Change ->mkdir() and vfs_mkdir() to return a dentry NeilBrown
2025-02-14  5:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] Change inode_operations.mkdir to return struct dentry * NeilBrown
2025-02-15  8:09   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-17 15:58   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-14  5:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfs: change mkdir inode_operation to return alternate dentry if needed NeilBrown
2025-02-14  5:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] VFS: Change vfs_mkdir() to return the dentry NeilBrown
2025-02-15  4:10   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-15  6:36   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-14  6:00 ` [PATCH 0/3} Change ->mkdir() and vfs_mkdir() to return a dentry Al Viro
2025-02-14  6:13   ` Al Viro
2025-02-14  6:33     ` Al Viro [this message]
2025-02-17  3:53   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250214063306.GD1977892@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=anna@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox