From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19DC6215068 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740153577; cv=none; b=Ox0KOCnhyzxmkEfULZ4z4RyS73mePc0k0yDr7HDLbfg3gniBcPBGqJ79NonU0epw1gATTiVzIWcfcEfWgVDyAfLuVys9X6Qvk4gY3nS2q/a3UCtb+SLrHoGb9cddxmviABxTKv7Zw9qLql/DLIkyvMt3UF5E1UYp9/fXk128w34= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740153577; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n0jF/j+mywMBUT0PErvXB3Zxie09TU9q8D93fb/8S/I=; h=From:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Subject; b=qAqEIwbgcUNe5i38vjsR4sUwxOfor+f1tujPKytXkAWpbF0LBZKyFGiEzcbd/ltqq+O3QTiTsgzCYYGVsEpQYjt03849LerQggSqh/DWBJRaxT66j9H36bEEp+uqcbAPNNbUHmM5LSLToiwmdnSy+VBy5FJFO2j/PXfrXULTKZw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YSVsLDY6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YSVsLDY6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81685C4CED6; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:59:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1740153576; bh=n0jF/j+mywMBUT0PErvXB3Zxie09TU9q8D93fb/8S/I=; h=From:Date:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=YSVsLDY6SHQFpg+kwgREXXvckcg5/AzV3O7ZPIcuxzQaDZGN5poSnu3juIhwVorWu UjSklKqyFi6pB3+zG076kmM1ZLKEYsGUvlZeOAnay12b0CNj97tCOzHn2F6rOD55UE 26uF06ktS0md0374e9iQ5BNaLJBlNAomHCH297Op4efpoRTSUDg5Iubkhp1o8PZ6z8 xLIiHXcz/d/B7EKs6DQyJ8fblQAtqHBT045j/4hxpHTNHmW1TCdXD8ejKLPWs3KQ8A q1ALdazIWoVKAHAd0YMhgTNk3j0ZFK4hYBFTktjchjCUuwRP+wqQ3dBrZf42mxdgI5 wsOzeJmZJSx6g== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B89380CEEE; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:00:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Chuck Lever via Bugspray Bot Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:00:39 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: tom@talpey.com, benoit.gschwind@minesparis.psl.eu, herzog@phys.ethz.ch, trondmy@kernel.org, carnil@debian.org, jlayton@kernel.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com, baptiste.pellegrin@ac-grenoble.fr, harald.dunkel@aixigo.com, cel@kernel.org, anna@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20250221-b219710c35-1dad5fc2b192@bugzilla.kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: NFSD threads hang when destroying a session or client ID X-Bugzilla-Product: File System X-Bugzilla-Component: NFSD X-Mailer: bugspray 0.1-dev Chuck Lever writes via Kernel.org Bugzilla: (In reply to Bugspray Bot from comment #29) > So I see the backport of 961b4b5e86bf NFSD: Reset cb_seq_status after > NFS4ERR_DELAY landed in the just released 6.1.129 stable version. > > Do we consider this to be sufficient to have stabilized the situation > about this issue? (I do realize much other work has dne as well which > partially has flown down to stable series already). > > This reply is mainly in focus of https://bugs.debian.org/1071562 Since we do not have a reproducer, it's difficult to ascertain with certainty that the issue has been addressed. Thus I feel it is up to the various original reporters to decide if they are happy with the solution above. I'm comfortable leaving this bug open for a while. View: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219710#c35 You can reply to this message to join the discussion. -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. Kernel.org Bugzilla (bugspray 0.1-dev)