From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE9027A137 for ; Thu, 8 May 2025 15:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746719004; cv=none; b=VcWePxCkH3Krr1PHsB/AE0SCmK/HaMbGT9KLg6HY32Rytvk5mn1FdCnXRKorsff9T+lIefox+Jrasna+aqJkkOhZHL1HoLp3UF/QJIhPmw5AOzT/Tia+cbL+puG3+QZWuEXYHf+6QxywXR1xnfaw1u7L8iMDt9GmHOUopeGfobI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746719004; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YuzFY5iIeE/5SyS+rcd6EVV7jCbQGUHQiVQ4+7iLZTM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ERayGgSV4DO00xDpBbV3ETu8UwNpsXPQtoHbgo2QyLcunX8wVHns3RgoPiSLeTa3IdfcTE4Nh7FH1qKGtJobYCKZs0EqkF8kouGtfrJZOQmIVkWnbTVGyqqHkeHlDd4AGUH8cpgQhy8CQgmHn4e0jzBWTPYIrTn3CIpDTu8G4no= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=a/fPBYXh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="a/fPBYXh" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746719003; x=1778255003; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=YuzFY5iIeE/5SyS+rcd6EVV7jCbQGUHQiVQ4+7iLZTM=; b=a/fPBYXhzbBqm2DUXSYS6vDT+G0Z9Q1QJAEpRlCnSTQgHi17o9Yr5ujz P6R/oAWrUmsrDsBhYjTlPvRoon2y+WvEpxChwnn+Mgi3nwMuq8uVjaooK cxG+Qu059huDpEKARntp5is8jBe4uTIIXRJdnAzP+/Trz1zl4gFSKca+i zoyADrF8wromv9aykPfaUQpsS3ApTI/8nMLev2G2xaCk0XoPpsfctIZPq iqSvDnXXdP0Oe/j67XDZQnOGUb3Gscr5g/L1HDQDZY6JmdXVSNIr1XCsr 2booFzPS9NjEX61J4bTd84CT1x3mYiiqR/SBs89rygZRfmZbegQukKYQ6 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Nf1DbWOUTsGycwNTIWporQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1gwsN+yLRBib9go+KGgJxQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11427"; a="48675975" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,272,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="48675975" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2025 08:43:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OBx61r3WTq6//JvgDGZtjw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DzpXdOVTR0eyOwi05XsawA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,272,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="136262748" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2025 08:43:14 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uD3Oy-000B7D-29; Thu, 08 May 2025 15:43:12 +0000 Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 23:42:18 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Christoph Hellwig , Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Neil Brown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: use rq_bvec instead of rq_vec in nfsd_vfs_write Message-ID: <202505082324.vojWBNIq-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250507115617.3995150-3-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250507115617.3995150-3-hch@lst.de> Hi Christoph, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test ERROR on trondmy-nfs/linux-next linus/master v6.15-rc5] [cannot apply to next-20250508] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christoph-Hellwig/nfsd-use-rq_bvec-instead-of-rq_vec-in-nfsd_vfs_write/20250507-205615 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250507115617.3995150-3-hch%40lst.de patch subject: [PATCH 2/3] nfsd: use rq_bvec instead of rq_vec in nfsd_vfs_write config: m68k-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250508/202505082324.vojWBNIq-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250508/202505082324.vojWBNIq-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505082324.vojWBNIq-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> ERROR: modpost: "xdr_buf_to_bvec" [fs/nfsd/nfsd.ko] undefined! -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki