From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6365F3A1DB for ; Sun, 11 May 2025 21:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746997229; cv=none; b=jzK7LwOS8anrhdNcdwccggabRZIwWtmxB5c5Snmb++2PVu1tZxcpghT1PR777xXQA9idoBM4Xl2A3mmO+BeAt9DEf5NfQs+d30agjLQ1WVzJqQ4pMlOZOLjpycSVN+uuGVS/N6vBhJFqv7u3pRTY1ReRS9UGyApx56/KFl1ejbY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746997229; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SnLtOL4VnTAPExi03uVjScviiH9gJ9/DViYjtUC9N1w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pAT5UdQb6m5uaFJUbc08pS0Te5uBdevX9opqG2hs5fks8irl0PAUE550G0c6c81fAauFqAyguLDpke5PafsJtw6D+ge3HghV2rCbRdPVg42lSQLLQTi1vVupro4wTY8/unvAmDhDYf2HabTKNtBDkvO+4fnO22r7gvxRzFfySwA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=l0F7mKV/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="l0F7mKV/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746997227; x=1778533227; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=SnLtOL4VnTAPExi03uVjScviiH9gJ9/DViYjtUC9N1w=; b=l0F7mKV/7as3OKxIGHtsw/oA+9MRSo4IEOx4bjlfNGnR8P6EnriDQuh2 f+PyOxCw5pf6LnY+e0eKoMRgpqBc0ODCTM/sCbistUMiTLJ/mTXDpBx6a K7CBdT5zv9Tv/CRD9cZi7EKSWF6+nLBjISuvF+TwAoOqzCckhAASM47FQ 2zPpvZD253dGA795mrdUIP7fW0R/GQ7JwiX5OIWBQ8HYgX+5q/49zwhka /laKyMvO8tqQBjyLBEL4x+delfR7Mw2T0ytfgT0AcKk/xTYVx+YlwFIfv NjfPE5u+hNwZNKa3FxGVQr8SKUbBYJg+yZhCqhFjzgEakjL4DjBRaO699 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qcxfr9usQXivdeisgcwGKw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +9jdLQfpSTCvtO5drrFKhg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11430"; a="66188807" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,281,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="66188807" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2025 14:00:27 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: e4J656JaTz2Xx8fWLoDPjg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SAcdSkjGQGOxSEYyK3eW7w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,281,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="141937974" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1992f890471c) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 May 2025 14:00:27 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 1992f890471c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uEDmZ-000DzP-2h; Sun, 11 May 2025 21:00:23 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 04:59:27 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: trondmy@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS/pnfs: Fix the error path in pnfs_layoutreturn_retry_later_locked() Message-ID: <202505120404.RyxNoBfS-lkp@intel.com> References: <7a4abcb32bb29ad463638bf1d2d0600a3d9e357c.1746970073.git.trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a4abcb32bb29ad463638bf1d2d0600a3d9e357c.1746970073.git.trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on trondmy-nfs/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc5 next-20250509] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/trondmy-kernel-org/NFS-pnfs-Fix-the-error-path-in-pnfs_layoutreturn_retry_later_locked/20250511-212905 base: git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git linux-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7a4abcb32bb29ad463638bf1d2d0600a3d9e357c.1746970073.git.trond.myklebust%40hammerspace.com patch subject: [PATCH] NFS/pnfs: Fix the error path in pnfs_layoutreturn_retry_later_locked() config: sh-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250512/202505120404.RyxNoBfS-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250512/202505120404.RyxNoBfS-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505120404.RyxNoBfS-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/nfs/pnfs.c: In function 'pnfs_layoutreturn_retry_later_locked': >> fs/nfs/pnfs.c:1254:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pnfs_reset_return_info'; did you mean 'pnfs_set_plh_return_info'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1254 | pnfs_reset_return_info(lo); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | pnfs_set_plh_return_info vim +1254 fs/nfs/pnfs.c 1245 1246 static void 1247 pnfs_layoutreturn_retry_later_locked(struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo, 1248 const nfs4_stateid *arg_stateid, 1249 const struct pnfs_layout_range *range, 1250 struct list_head *freeme) 1251 { 1252 if (pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo) && 1253 nfs4_stateid_match_other(&lo->plh_stateid, arg_stateid)) > 1254 pnfs_reset_return_info(lo); 1255 else 1256 pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid(lo, freeme); 1257 pnfs_clear_layoutreturn_waitbit(lo); 1258 } 1259 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki