public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove the max-ops-per-compound-limit
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:05:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250610160509.97599-1-cel@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>

After some discussion last year, Jeff reasoned that there was no
architectural reason NFSD has to restrict the number of
operations per NFSv4 COMPOUND. This is an experimental series to
explore that idea.

Chuck Lever (3):
  NFSD: Rename a function parameter
  NFSD: Make nfsd_genl_rqstp::rq_ops array best-effort
  NFSD: Remove the cap on number of operations per NFSv4 COMPOUND

 fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c  | 14 ++------------
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |  1 -
 fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c   |  4 +---
 fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c    | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 fs/nfsd/nfsd.h      |  5 +----
 fs/nfsd/xdr4.h      |  1 -
 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

-- 
2.49.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-10 16:05 Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-06-10 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] NFSD: Rename a function parameter Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] NFSD: Make nfsd_genl_rqstp::rq_ops array best-effort Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] NFSD: Remove the cap on number of operations per NFSv4 COMPOUND Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 17:01   ` Jeff Layton
2025-06-10 17:07     ` Chuck Lever
2025-06-10 17:28 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Remove the max-ops-per-compound-limit Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250610160509.97599-1-cel@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox