From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCHES][RFC][CFT] rpc_pipefs cleanups
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:31:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250613073149.GI1647736@ZenIV> (raw)
Another series pulled out of tree-in-dcache pile; it massages
rpc_pipefs to use saner primitives. Lives in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #work.rpc_pipe
6.16-rc1-based, 17 commits, -314 lines of code...
Individual patches in followups.
Folks, please test and review. In various forms this has sat in my tree
for more than a year and I'd rather get that logjam dealt with.
Overview:
Prep/infrastructure (#1 is shared with #work.simple_recursive_removal)
1) simple_recursive_removal(): saner interaction with fsnotify
fsnotify events are triggered before the callback, unlike in real
unlink(2)/rmdir(2) syscalls. Obviously matters only in case when callback
is non-empty, which excludes most of the current users in the kernel.
2) new helper: simple_start_creating()
Set the things up for kernel-initiated creation of object in a
tree-in-dcache filesystem. With respect to locking it's an equivalent of
filename_create() - we either get a negative dentry with locked parent,
or ERR_PTR() and no locks taken.
tracefs and debugfs had that open-coded as part of their object
creation machinery; switched to calling new helper.
rpc_pipefs proper:
3) rpc_pipe: clean failure exits in fill_super
->kill_sb() will be called immediately after a failure
return anyway, so we don't need to bother with notifier chain and
rpc_gssd_dummy_depopulate(). What's more, rpc_gssd_dummy_populate()
failure exits do not need to bother with __rpc_depopulate() - anything
added to the tree will be taken out by ->kill_sb().
4) rpc_{rmdir_,}depopulate(): use simple_recursive_removal() instead
no need to give an exact list of objects to be remove when it's
simply every child of the victim directory.
5) rpc_unlink(): use simple_recursive_removal()
Previous commit was dealing with directories; this one is for
named pipes (i.e. the thing rpc_pipefs is used for). Note that the
callback of simple_recursive_removal() is called with the parent locked;
the victim isn't locked by the caller.
6) rpc_populate(): lift cleanup into callers
rpc_populate() is called either from fill_super (where we
don't need to remove any files on failure - rpc_kill_sb() will take
them all out anyway) or from rpc_mkdir_populate(), where we need to
remove the directory we'd been trying to populate along with whatever
we'd put into it before we failed. Simpler to combine that into
simple_recursive_removal() there.
7) rpc_unlink(): saner calling conventions
* pass it pipe instead of pipe->dentry
* zero pipe->dentry afterwards
* it always returns 0; why bother?
8) rpc_mkpipe_dentry(): saner calling conventions
Instead of returning a dentry or ERR_PTR(-E...), return 0 and
store dentry into pipe->dentry on success and return -E... on failure.
Callers are happier that way...
9) rpc_pipe: don't overdo directory locking
Don't try to hold directories locked more than VFS requires;
lock just before getting a child to be made positive (using
simple_start_creating()) and unlock as soon as the child is created.
There's no benefit in keeping the parent locked while populating the
child - it won't stop dcache lookups anyway.
10) rpc_pipe: saner primitive for creating subdirectories
All users of __rpc_mkdir() have the same form - start_creating(),
followed, in case of success, by __rpc_mkdir() and unlocking parent.
Combine that into a single helper, expanding __rpc_mkdir() into it, along
with the call of __rpc_create_common() in it.
Don't mess with d_drop() + d_add() - just d_instantiate()
and be done with that. The reason __rpc_create_common() goes for that
dance is that dentry it gets might or might not be hashed; here we know
it's hashed.
11) rpc_pipe: saner primitive for creating regular files
rpc_new_file(); similar to rpc_new_dir(), except that here we
pass file_operations as well. Callers don't care about dentry, just
return 0 or -E...
12) rpc_mkpipe_dentry(): switch to start_creating()
... and make sure we set the rpc_pipe-private part of inode up
before attaching it to dentry.
13) rpc_gssd_dummy_populate(): don't bother with rpc_populate()
Just have it create gssd (in root), clntXX in gssd, then info
and gssd in clntXX - all with explicit
rpc_new_dir()/rpc_new_file()/rpc_mkpipe_dentry().
14) rpc_pipe: expand the calls of rpc_mkdir_populate()
... and get rid of convoluted callbacks.
15) rpc_new_dir(): the last argument is always NULL
All callers except the one in rpc_populate() pass explicit NULL
there; rpc_populate() passes its last argument ('private') instead,
but in the only call of rpc_populate() that creates any subdirectories
(when creating fixed subdirectories of root) private itself is NULL.
16) rpc_create_client_dir(): don't bother with rpc_populate()
not for a single file...
17) rpc_create_client_dir(): return 0 or -E...
Callers couldn't care less which dentry did we get - anything
valid is treated as success.
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 7:31 Al Viro [this message]
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 01/17] simple_recursive_removal(): saner interaction with fsnotify Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 02/17] new helper: simple_start_creating() Al Viro
2025-06-13 18:31 ` Jeff Layton
2025-06-13 22:36 ` Al Viro
2025-06-13 23:46 ` Jeff Layton
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 03/17] rpc_pipe: clean failure exits in fill_super Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 04/17] rpc_{rmdir_,}depopulate(): use simple_recursive_removal() instead Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 05/17] rpc_unlink(): use simple_recursive_removal() Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 06/17] rpc_populate(): lift cleanup into callers Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 07/17] rpc_unlink(): saner calling conventions Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 08/17] rpc_mkpipe_dentry(): " Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 09/17] rpc_pipe: don't overdo directory locking Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 10/17] rpc_pipe: saner primitive for creating subdirectories Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 11/17] rpc_pipe: saner primitive for creating regular files Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 12/17] rpc_mkpipe_dentry(): switch to start_creating() Al Viro
2025-06-13 19:27 ` Jeff Layton
2025-06-16 19:26 ` Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 13/17] rpc_gssd_dummy_populate(): don't bother with rpc_populate() Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 14/17] rpc_pipe: expand the calls of rpc_mkdir_populate() Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 15/17] rpc_new_dir(): the last argument is always NULL Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 16/17] rpc_create_client_dir(): don't bother with rpc_populate() Al Viro
2025-06-13 7:34 ` [PATCH 17/17] rpc_create_client_dir(): return 0 or -E Al Viro
2025-06-13 8:19 ` [PATCH 01/17] simple_recursive_removal(): saner interaction with fsnotify Amir Goldstein
2025-06-13 19:32 ` [PATCHES][RFC][CFT] rpc_pipefs cleanups Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250613073149.GI1647736@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox