From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3DDFEAE7; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 20:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758832359; cv=none; b=WL2KOmaAilmAyy3XSQGRTqeAov2/ei+/ZUzp0ttWdQN5YzfTfmuvdu+nYQ/kabQAzDqDhuY8eItZ2tmQoovo9mD8zkv3KSpQFTATngGcQQta6FTxfkjQNeXUKyC6qsDzIWUgdii4ws5nfAxZjTHNutfERWLv5J5X3+XPZM+fqEE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758832359; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LH5+K3GRpQXNBPw30ObKfOhuQY+wJt77ujcb37iB2dE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=enSx8w4/a0YrupqRc6nTDPc1HaXEfpgKJNTxlbWBMY0tOJBKDLH7hFY6PN5okDrHhWqr5v5CNGQabkaq1RLGNriK3BDVWlOgRC4R7lSPKTMrKrZGtC3s2+3J90zlSK900DsRIsvBGBzhe5wxKh3AZBQUZEBvf+fTZnglReFKk4I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OuezkN83; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OuezkN83" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50CB3C4CEF0; Thu, 25 Sep 2025 20:32:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758832358; bh=LH5+K3GRpQXNBPw30ObKfOhuQY+wJt77ujcb37iB2dE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OuezkN83cwh6QB9uXazZZFSiedSHQbYGQcEmK8Y/ga8bMFK5tt2WVVt8yQq/IHbPm yks8uFFZEKilaJiBt2VjiWNZisqCO9K1EyaJNgdaU1KXC+7rEVRqpO9qQKsS0ff9jn hQcTHPs2mOTN1DgLIE4X3NIt1Joivuxn7OY7wB8jfCr0L+8pKCRtBm8OIkpax3+ON6 LTWwvrZGNHYDXzNT93weqTryCemMXYkvq/3wdOhlONdz3TqR/EGN2cEWcwY+hlVJY6 I7WiHIILb67wicfJyTRgSltAg+zOZNElnHJqMXlLBI2/u8oDwIK4vSCysHvKdRnS6m HIAIOon2AqEZQ== Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 16:32:33 -0400 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Jeff Layton Cc: Chuck Lever , NeilBrown , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , Simon Horman , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, Anna Schumaker Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: Move strlen declaration in nfsd4_encode_components_esc() Message-ID: <20250925203233.GB491548@ax162> References: <20250925-nfsd-fix-trace-printk-strlen-error-v1-1-1360530e4c6b@kernel.org> <6669bd1e-ba37-433a-8f8c-5cd9787b846f@oracle.com> <27d0b9176a444dcf87ecd40c17b6ed1865c1b789.camel@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <27d0b9176a444dcf87ecd40c17b6ed1865c1b789.camel@kernel.org> On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 12:52:10PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Thu, 2025-09-25 at 09:43 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > > Would anyone be heartbroken if this patch removed the dprintk call site? Yeah, I had figured this print may be low value and worth removing as a fix. > > I think renaming the strlen variable to a name with a lower collision > > risk would be sensible as well. > > > > Fine with me on both counts. No point in overloading a well known > function name here. Agreed. Should I send a patch or does someone else want to? Cheers, Nathan