From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2264726AC3 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2025 01:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763773393; cv=none; b=XjYSL7DX5WfKUvF3lU41At/9weY4XIqyOC8o/0JSpsPbdETGHdtt6hkJvcfPBa3zEtrL8lOTcofjJxrBFlJli8WJwreOxtEi2l5hBmX98AjI3z1LXwpxFmyfVDU4xVzZEDFZFcHrXQ/h82U18BYdyJXn65yh8Fx+HaA2XltThmQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763773393; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KhtOvWbrpyzsUXj+m2g8DYlUIXNJa176Hl4/Z0D8+e0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=LyK5LqmJVz61vlC9w+uF4uQxCqIzAKrJgvoTeSXb2XDJYADy55JnjZ6IhGWXpB1AcvxBYiU5nV9pOv649vRxXsKFH8RvsugqfA91KR8oablxeTsZ3yQ9k6dubmwVUQmTDg/ISVZGIBCFO3GiGcBwBzRQkNQduwDeRvgBRqAwf+Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ownmail.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ownmail.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ownmail.net header.i=@ownmail.net header.b=gliz0rvm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=cjkvaliE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ownmail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ownmail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ownmail.net header.i=@ownmail.net header.b="gliz0rvm"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="cjkvaliE" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5153FEC0096; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 20:03:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Nov 2025 20:03:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ownmail.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1763773388; x=1763859788; bh=nKI9qwn0x8 cw4kxSVjd/8z5FMzKop7ArseQIUkM919U=; b=gliz0rvmEboHViKYxUL20RKGCz 5Cg/Am5po1t824+/fY0mHjhFX6m0ugtRtKNJxR5TTNCEs2NwnGGh2yeginPVQ5Po AFvrEdc239BuI/sYKHLhNU/SqAheBVXx1qmqxcfDdBmrvLq+kaQpY9jqx2pzoG+W JNXiYsA0HnAMyM8AmpGQO9wsqyIx+15d1K3aJsJoC27ojm0+Lg1r19i/964Y+aMW f5q2j817utl38gOR+2OsPPGxMR1NNAVHgEglmXW6/B7xCCK/7MV4v5Ad3bsa53bK 69Uvoam6q9jnzB2uLZZx+jKE7ISxKksM4lmTq5j3pF35Ua3h2iAU30NSuk7g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1763773388; x=1763859788; bh=nKI9qwn0x8cw4kxSVjd/8z5FMzKo p7ArseQIUkM919U=; b=cjkvaliEgfGfaizboYUuozcSnjvzcyRJkAxarIh6lDi8 M5c/0bzP6+KWDR1L5x2JmXESfmB8NptoN+02WQe+UzzXTzE50GvmkV88qwnEkqZI Ow40DxxN3bJJJ4ENPT7Vn9FGdA/GDZUEnSFbj+l75YR90MDHUCzgACwJxmOLsSPb +/Owv25tG+RY0pB0bxO7YZZb1P/ZD6hXU4HTpXaIdo3gldMdqIUY9HPuyYzoWtSg qo/SM+pY/JtzeSy5KtjXHORFKvn87yl8YWUeo3VZ98TpN+Kjw5ToFZydYj+02AFE iNonTGwg7u4HcokANRqbUKOGdNAh0UIsvhVVLHdHgg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddvfedugeejucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefufffkofhrggfgsedtkeertdertddtnecuhfhrohhmpefpvghilheurhho fihnuceonhgvihhlsgesohifnhhmrghilhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepge etfeegtddtvdeigfegueevfeelleelgfejueefueektdelieeikeevtdelveelnecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhgvihhlsgesoh ifnhhmrghilhdrnhgvthdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht pdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqnhhfshesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprh gtphhtthhopehtohhmsehtrghlphgvhidrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehokhhorhhnihgv vhesrhgvughhrghtrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheptghhuhgtkhdrlhgvvhgvrhesohhrrg gtlhgvrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrihdrnhhgohesohhrrggtlhgvrdgtohhmpdhr tghpthhtohepjhhlrgihthhonheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iab3e480c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 21 Nov 2025 20:03:05 -0500 (EST) From: NeilBrown To: Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton Cc: Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] lockd/locks: address issues with vfs_test_lock() Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 12:00:35 +1100 Message-ID: <20251122010253.3445570-1-neilb@ownmail.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.0.107.gf914562f5916.dirty Reply-To: NeilBrown Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit v2 contains fixes to problem found by Chuck (thanks) and also improves the documentation for vfs_test_lock(). Documentation says that it returns 0 or -ERRNO, but one caller check for a FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED which is neither of those. So I address that in the second patch. Thanks, NeilBrown [PATCH v2 1/2] lockd: fix vfs_test_lock() calls [PATCH v2 2/2] locks: ensure vfs_test_lock() never returns