From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] NFSD: Add asynchronous write throttling support
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:00:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260107080057.GB19005@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219141105.1247093-3-cel@kernel.org>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 09:11:05AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
> When memory pressure occurs during buffered writes, the traditional
> approach is for balance_dirty_pages() to put the writing thread to
> sleep until dirty pages are flushed. For NFSD, this means server
> threads block waiting for I/O, reducing overall server throughput.
>
> Add support for asynchronous write throttling using the BDP_ASYNC
> flag to balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags(). When enabled via:
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/nfsd/write_async_throttle
Let me reiterate that I really, really hate all this magic debugs-fs
enabled features. Either they are gnuinely useful (think this would
be such a thing) and they should be enabled unconditionally, or they
are tradeoffs and should have a proper tunable not hidden in debugfs.
> NFSD checks memory pressure before attempting buffered writes. If
> balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags() returns -EAGAIN (indicating
> memory exhaustion), NFSD returns NFS4ERR_DELAY (or NFSERR_JUKEBOX for
> NFSv3) to the client instead of blocking.
>
> This allows clients to back off and retry rather than having server
> threads tied up waiting for writeback. The setting defaults to 0
> (synchronous throttling) and can be combined with write_throttle for
> layered throttling strategies.
>
> Note: NFSv2 does not support NFSERR_JUKEBOX, so async throttling is
> automatically disabled for NFSv2 requests regardless of the setting.
This all seems very useful to me. But it really needs to show numbers
on how it helps.
> + * Contents:
> + * %0: Synchronous throttling (default) - writes sleep in balance_dirty_pages()
Overly lone line.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-07 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 14:11 [RFC PATCH 0/2] NFSD: Rate-limiting unstable WRITEs Chuck Lever
2025-12-19 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] NFSD: Add aggressive write throttling control Chuck Lever
2026-01-07 7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-07 14:36 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-07 14:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-07 14:49 ` Chuck Lever
2025-12-19 14:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] NFSD: Add asynchronous write throttling support Chuck Lever
2026-01-07 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-07 14:42 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-07 16:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-07 19:40 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260107080057.GB19005@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox