From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
daire@dneg.com, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/7] workqueue: Automatic affinity scope fallback for single-pod topologies
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:57:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260205155729.6841-2-cel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205155729.6841-1-cel@kernel.org>
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
The default affinity scope WQ_AFFN_CACHE assumes systems have
multiple last-level caches. On systems where all CPUs share a
single LLC (common with Intel monolithic dies), this scope
degenerates to a single worker pool. All queue_work() calls then
contend on that pool's single lock, causing severe performance
degradation under high-throughput workloads.
For example, on a 12-core system with a single shared L3 cache
running NFS over RDMA with 12 fio jobs, perf shows approximately
39% of CPU cycles spent in native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath,
nearly all from __queue_work() contending on the single pool lock.
On such systems WQ_AFFN_CACHE, WQ_AFFN_SMT, and WQ_AFFN_NUMA
scopes all collapse to a single pod.
Add wq_effective_affn_scope() to detect when a selected affinity
scope provides only one pod despite having multiple CPUs, and
automatically fall back to a finer-grained scope. This enables lock
distribution to scale with CPU count without requiring manual
configuration via the workqueue.default_affinity_scope parameter or
per-workqueue sysfs tuning.
The fallback is conservative: it triggers only when a scope
degenerates to exactly one pod, and respects explicitly configured
(non-default) scopes.
Also update wq_affn_scope_show() to display the effective scope
when fallback occurs, making the behavior transparent to
administrators via sysfs (e.g., "default (cache -> smt)").
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 8 ++++-
kernel/workqueue.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index dabc351cc127..1fca5791337d 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -128,10 +128,16 @@ struct rcu_work {
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
};
+/*
+ * Affinity scopes are ordered from finest to coarsest granularity. This
+ * ordering is used by the automatic fallback logic in wq_effective_affn_scope()
+ * which walks from coarse toward fine when a scope degenerates to a single pod.
+ */
enum wq_affn_scope {
WQ_AFFN_DFL, /* use system default */
WQ_AFFN_CPU, /* one pod per CPU */
- WQ_AFFN_SMT, /* one pod poer SMT */
+ WQ_AFFN_SMT, /* one pod per SMT */
+ WQ_AFFN_CLUSTER, /* one pod per cluster */
WQ_AFFN_CACHE, /* one pod per LLC */
WQ_AFFN_NUMA, /* one pod per NUMA node */
WQ_AFFN_SYSTEM, /* one pod across the whole system */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 253311af47c6..32598b9cd1c2 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ static const char *wq_affn_names[WQ_AFFN_NR_TYPES] = {
[WQ_AFFN_DFL] = "default",
[WQ_AFFN_CPU] = "cpu",
[WQ_AFFN_SMT] = "smt",
+ [WQ_AFFN_CLUSTER] = "cluster",
[WQ_AFFN_CACHE] = "cache",
[WQ_AFFN_NUMA] = "numa",
[WQ_AFFN_SYSTEM] = "system",
@@ -4753,6 +4754,39 @@ static void wqattrs_actualize_cpumask(struct workqueue_attrs *attrs,
cpumask_copy(attrs->cpumask, unbound_cpumask);
}
+/*
+ * Determine the effective affinity scope. If the configured scope results
+ * in a single pod (e.g., WQ_AFFN_CACHE on a system with one shared LLC),
+ * fall back to a finer-grained scope to distribute pool lock contention.
+ *
+ * The search stops at WQ_AFFN_CPU, which always provides one pod per CPU
+ * and thus cannot degenerate further.
+ *
+ * Returns the scope to actually use, which may differ from the configured
+ * scope on systems where coarser scopes degenerate.
+ */
+static enum wq_affn_scope wq_effective_affn_scope(enum wq_affn_scope scope)
+{
+ struct wq_pod_type *pt;
+
+ /*
+ * Walk from the requested scope toward finer granularity. Stop
+ * when a scope provides more than one pod, or when CPU scope is
+ * reached. CPU scope always provides nr_possible_cpus() pods.
+ */
+ while (scope > WQ_AFFN_CPU) {
+ pt = &wq_pod_types[scope];
+
+ /* Multiple pods at this scope; no fallback needed */
+ if (pt->nr_pods > 1)
+ break;
+
+ scope--;
+ }
+
+ return scope;
+}
+
/* find wq_pod_type to use for @attrs */
static const struct wq_pod_type *
wqattrs_pod_type(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
@@ -4763,8 +4797,13 @@ wqattrs_pod_type(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
/* to synchronize access to wq_affn_dfl */
lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
+ /*
+ * For default scope, apply automatic fallback for degenerate
+ * topologies. Explicit scope selection via sysfs or per-workqueue
+ * attributes bypasses fallback, preserving administrator intent.
+ */
if (attrs->affn_scope == WQ_AFFN_DFL)
- scope = wq_affn_dfl;
+ scope = wq_effective_affn_scope(wq_affn_dfl);
else
scope = attrs->affn_scope;
@@ -7206,16 +7245,27 @@ static ssize_t wq_affn_scope_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq = dev_to_wq(dev);
+ enum wq_affn_scope scope, effective;
int written;
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- if (wq->unbound_attrs->affn_scope == WQ_AFFN_DFL)
- written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s (%s)\n",
- wq_affn_names[WQ_AFFN_DFL],
- wq_affn_names[wq_affn_dfl]);
- else
+ if (wq->unbound_attrs->affn_scope == WQ_AFFN_DFL) {
+ scope = wq_affn_dfl;
+ effective = wq_effective_affn_scope(scope);
+ if (wq_pod_types[effective].nr_pods >
+ wq_pod_types[scope].nr_pods)
+ written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s (%s -> %s)\n",
+ wq_affn_names[WQ_AFFN_DFL],
+ wq_affn_names[scope],
+ wq_affn_names[effective]);
+ else
+ written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s (%s)\n",
+ wq_affn_names[WQ_AFFN_DFL],
+ wq_affn_names[scope]);
+ } else {
written = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n",
wq_affn_names[wq->unbound_attrs->affn_scope]);
+ }
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
return written;
@@ -8023,6 +8073,11 @@ static bool __init cpus_share_smt(int cpu0, int cpu1)
#endif
}
+static bool __init cpus_share_cluster(int cpu0, int cpu1)
+{
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu0, topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu1));
+}
+
static bool __init cpus_share_numa(int cpu0, int cpu1)
{
return cpu_to_node(cpu0) == cpu_to_node(cpu1);
@@ -8042,6 +8097,7 @@ void __init workqueue_init_topology(void)
init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_CPU], cpus_dont_share);
init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_SMT], cpus_share_smt);
+ init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_CLUSTER], cpus_share_cluster);
init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_CACHE], cpus_share_cache);
init_pod_type(&wq_pod_types[WQ_AFFN_NUMA], cpus_share_numa);
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-05 15:57 [RFC PATCH 0/7] sunrpc: Reduce lock contention for NFSD TCP sockets Chuck Lever
2026-02-05 15:57 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-02-06 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] workqueue: Automatic affinity scope fallback for single-pod topologies Chuck Lever
2026-02-05 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] sunrpc: split svc_data_ready into protocol-specific callbacks Chuck Lever
2026-02-05 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] sunrpc: add per-transport page recycling pool Chuck Lever
2026-02-05 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] sunrpc: add dedicated TCP receiver thread Chuck Lever
2026-02-05 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] sunrpc: implement flat combining for TCP socket sends Chuck Lever
2026-02-05 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] sunrpc: unify fore and backchannel server TCP send paths Chuck Lever
2026-02-05 15:57 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] SUNRPC: Set explicit TCP socket buffer sizes for NFSD Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260205155729.6841-2-cel@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=daire@dneg.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox