From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] exportfs: split out the ops for layout-based block device access
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 16:27:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260401142743.GB22685@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a916e82550e128c22c0e559b16f68b8cd56c8b05.camel@kernel.org>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 01:24:23PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Meh, ok. Almost doesn't seem worthwhile, but I guess the result is a
> bit cleaner layering-wise.
It also avoid pulling extra includes into exportfs.h only needed for
the new block layout inline helpers added in the last patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 15:33 cleanup block-style layouts exports Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd/blocklayout: always ignore loca_time_modify Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:09 ` Jeff Layton
2026-04-01 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] exportfs: split out the ops for layout-based block device access Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:24 ` Jeff Layton
2026-04-01 14:27 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-03-31 18:07 ` Chuck Lever
2026-04-01 6:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] exportfs: don't pass struct iattr to ->commit_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:26 ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-31 17:30 ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-31 17:33 ` Jeff Layton
2026-04-01 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] exportfs,nfsd: rework checking for layout-based block device access support Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:52 ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-31 18:00 ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-31 17:33 ` cleanup block-style layouts exports Chuck Lever
2026-04-01 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 13:39 ` Chuck Lever
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-01 14:40 cleanup block-style layouts exports v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] exportfs: split out the ops for layout-based block device access Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260401142743.GB22685@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox