* [PATCH v1 0/2] NFS: fix RCU and tracing pointer safety @ 2026-04-08 16:14 Sean Chang 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] NFS: fix RCU safety in nfs_compare_super_address Sean Chang 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] NFS: use unsigned long for req field in nfs_page_class Sean Chang 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sean Chang @ 2026-04-08 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: trondmy, anna; +Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Sean Chang This series addresses two Sparse static analysis warnings in the NFS client. The first patch fixes an RCU-unsafe dereference when comparing superblock addresses by adding the necessary RCU read lock and dereference wrappers. The second patch resolves a "noderef" warning in the tracing infrastructure by changing a pointer field to an unsigned long, ensuring we aren't incorrectly marking private trace-buffer pointers as dereferenceable. Sean Chang (2): NFS: fix RCU safety in nfs_compare_super_address NFS: use unsigned long for req field in nfs_page_class fs/nfs/nfstrace.h | 6 +++--- fs/nfs/super.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 1/2] NFS: fix RCU safety in nfs_compare_super_address 2026-04-08 16:14 [PATCH v1 0/2] NFS: fix RCU and tracing pointer safety Sean Chang @ 2026-04-08 16:14 ` Sean Chang 2026-04-10 15:09 ` Benjamin Coddington 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] NFS: use unsigned long for req field in nfs_page_class Sean Chang 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sean Chang @ 2026-04-08 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: trondmy, anna; +Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Sean Chang The cl_xprt pointer in struct rpc_clnt is marked as __rcu. Accessing it directly in nfs_compare_super_address() without RCU protection is unsafe and triggers Sparse warnings about dereferencing noderef expressions. Fix this by wrapping the access with rcu_read_lock() and using rcu_dereference() to safely retrieve the transport pointer. This ensures the xprt remains valid during the comparison of network namespaces and addresses, preventing potential use-after-free during concurrent transport updates. Signed-off-by: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com> --- fs/nfs/super.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c index 7a318581f85b..071337f9ea37 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/super.c +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c @@ -1166,43 +1166,55 @@ static int nfs_set_super(struct super_block *s, struct fs_context *fc) static int nfs_compare_super_address(struct nfs_server *server1, struct nfs_server *server2) { + struct rpc_xprt *xprt1, *xprt2; struct sockaddr *sap1, *sap2; - struct rpc_xprt *xprt1 = server1->client->cl_xprt; - struct rpc_xprt *xprt2 = server2->client->cl_xprt; + int ret = 0; + + rcu_read_lock(); + + xprt1 = rcu_dereference(server1->client->cl_xprt); + xprt2 = rcu_dereference(server2->client->cl_xprt); + + if (!xprt1 || !xprt2) + goto out; if (!net_eq(xprt1->xprt_net, xprt2->xprt_net)) - return 0; + goto out; sap1 = (struct sockaddr *)&server1->nfs_client->cl_addr; sap2 = (struct sockaddr *)&server2->nfs_client->cl_addr; if (sap1->sa_family != sap2->sa_family) - return 0; + goto out; switch (sap1->sa_family) { case AF_INET: { struct sockaddr_in *sin1 = (struct sockaddr_in *)sap1; struct sockaddr_in *sin2 = (struct sockaddr_in *)sap2; if (sin1->sin_addr.s_addr != sin2->sin_addr.s_addr) - return 0; + goto out; if (sin1->sin_port != sin2->sin_port) - return 0; + goto out; break; } case AF_INET6: { struct sockaddr_in6 *sin1 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap1; struct sockaddr_in6 *sin2 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap2; if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr)) - return 0; + goto out; if (sin1->sin6_port != sin2->sin6_port) - return 0; + goto out; break; } default: - return 0; + goto out; } - return 1; + ret = 1; + +out: + rcu_read_unlock(); + return ret; } static int nfs_compare_userns(const struct nfs_server *old, -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] NFS: fix RCU safety in nfs_compare_super_address 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] NFS: fix RCU safety in nfs_compare_super_address Sean Chang @ 2026-04-10 15:09 ` Benjamin Coddington 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Coddington @ 2026-04-10 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sean Chang; +Cc: trondmy, anna, linux-nfs, linux-kernel On 8 Apr 2026, at 12:14, Sean Chang wrote: > The cl_xprt pointer in struct rpc_clnt is marked as __rcu. Accessing > it directly in nfs_compare_super_address() without RCU protection is > unsafe and triggers Sparse warnings about dereferencing noderef > expressions. > > Fix this by wrapping the access with rcu_read_lock() and using > rcu_dereference() to safely retrieve the transport pointer. This > ensures the xprt remains valid during the comparison of network > namespaces and addresses, preventing potential use-after-free during > concurrent transport updates. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com> Fixes: 7e3fcf61abde ("nfs: don't share mounts between network namespaces") > --- > fs/nfs/super.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c > index 7a318581f85b..071337f9ea37 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/super.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c > @@ -1166,43 +1166,55 @@ static int nfs_set_super(struct super_block *s, struct fs_context *fc) > static int nfs_compare_super_address(struct nfs_server *server1, > struct nfs_server *server2) > { > + struct rpc_xprt *xprt1, *xprt2; > struct sockaddr *sap1, *sap2; > - struct rpc_xprt *xprt1 = server1->client->cl_xprt; > - struct rpc_xprt *xprt2 = server2->client->cl_xprt; > + int ret = 0; > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + > + xprt1 = rcu_dereference(server1->client->cl_xprt); > + xprt2 = rcu_dereference(server2->client->cl_xprt); > + > + if (!xprt1 || !xprt2) > + goto out; ^^ I'm not sure that's a great test, the rpc_xprt objects are refcounted. These might not be null but you could still race with a freeing path? However, I think you might just be safe inside the RCU section here because rpc_switch_client_transport() uses synchronize_rcu() before xprt_put(old). I didn't audit all the freeing paths. > if (!net_eq(xprt1->xprt_net, xprt2->xprt_net)) > - return 0; > + goto out; Probably safe to drop the RCU protection scope after this point. No need to hold it over all the other checks.. Ben > > sap1 = (struct sockaddr *)&server1->nfs_client->cl_addr; > sap2 = (struct sockaddr *)&server2->nfs_client->cl_addr; > > if (sap1->sa_family != sap2->sa_family) > - return 0; > + goto out; > > switch (sap1->sa_family) { > case AF_INET: { > struct sockaddr_in *sin1 = (struct sockaddr_in *)sap1; > struct sockaddr_in *sin2 = (struct sockaddr_in *)sap2; > if (sin1->sin_addr.s_addr != sin2->sin_addr.s_addr) > - return 0; > + goto out; > if (sin1->sin_port != sin2->sin_port) > - return 0; > + goto out; > break; > } > case AF_INET6: { > struct sockaddr_in6 *sin1 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap1; > struct sockaddr_in6 *sin2 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)sap2; > if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin2->sin6_addr)) > - return 0; > + goto out; > if (sin1->sin6_port != sin2->sin6_port) > - return 0; > + goto out; > break; > } > default: > - return 0; > + goto out; > } > > - return 1; > + ret = 1; > + > +out: > + rcu_read_unlock(); > + return ret; > } > > static int nfs_compare_userns(const struct nfs_server *old, > -- > 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1 2/2] NFS: use unsigned long for req field in nfs_page_class 2026-04-08 16:14 [PATCH v1 0/2] NFS: fix RCU and tracing pointer safety Sean Chang 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] NFS: fix RCU safety in nfs_compare_super_address Sean Chang @ 2026-04-08 16:14 ` Sean Chang 2026-04-10 15:23 ` Benjamin Coddington 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Sean Chang @ 2026-04-08 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: trondmy, anna; +Cc: linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Sean Chang The nfs_page_class tracepoint used a pointer for the req field. This caused Sparse to complain about dereferencing a pointer marked as __private within the trace ring buffer context. Change the field type to unsigned long to store the address of the request without dereferencing it. Update TP_printk to use 0x%lx for consistent hexadecimal output, allowing for unique identification of requests across the trace log. Signed-off-by: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com> --- fs/nfs/nfstrace.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h b/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h index 9f9ce4a565ea..4150bbd99cfa 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h +++ b/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nfs_page_class, __field(dev_t, dev) __field(u32, fhandle) __field(u64, fileid) - __field(const struct nfs_page *__private, req) + __field(unsigned long, req) __field(loff_t, offset) __field(unsigned int, count) __field(unsigned long, flags) @@ -1509,14 +1509,14 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nfs_page_class, __entry->dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev; __entry->fileid = nfsi->fileid; __entry->fhandle = nfs_fhandle_hash(&nfsi->fh); - __entry->req = req; + __entry->req = (unsigned long)req; __entry->offset = req_offset(req); __entry->count = req->wb_bytes; __entry->flags = req->wb_flags; ), TP_printk( - "fileid=%02x:%02x:%llu fhandle=0x%08x req=%p offset=%lld count=%u flags=%s", + "fileid=%02x:%02x:%llu fhandle=0x%08x req=0x%lx offset=%lld count=%u flags=%s", MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev), (unsigned long long)__entry->fileid, __entry->fhandle, __entry->req, __entry->offset, __entry->count, -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] NFS: use unsigned long for req field in nfs_page_class 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] NFS: use unsigned long for req field in nfs_page_class Sean Chang @ 2026-04-10 15:23 ` Benjamin Coddington 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Benjamin Coddington @ 2026-04-10 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sean Chang; +Cc: trondmy, anna, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, Jeff Layton Hi Sean, On 8 Apr 2026, at 12:14, Sean Chang wrote: > The nfs_page_class tracepoint used a pointer for the req field. This > caused Sparse to complain about dereferencing a pointer marked as > __private within the trace ring buffer context. > > Change the field type to unsigned long to store the address of the > request without dereferencing it. Update TP_printk to use 0x%lx for > consistent hexadecimal output, allowing for unique identification of > requests across the trace log. Probably we don't want to bypass the %p formatting because some configurations use it to obfuscate kernel pointers. I think in this context the __private annotation is incorrect. We deref the nfs_page pointer only in TP_fast_assign() which runs at the call site, and the TP_printk only outputs the pointer value. cc: Jeff Ben > > Signed-off-by: Sean Chang <seanwascoding@gmail.com> > --- > fs/nfs/nfstrace.h | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h b/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h > index 9f9ce4a565ea..4150bbd99cfa 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfstrace.h > @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nfs_page_class, > __field(dev_t, dev) > __field(u32, fhandle) > __field(u64, fileid) > - __field(const struct nfs_page *__private, req) > + __field(unsigned long, req) > __field(loff_t, offset) > __field(unsigned int, count) > __field(unsigned long, flags) > @@ -1509,14 +1509,14 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(nfs_page_class, > __entry->dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev; > __entry->fileid = nfsi->fileid; > __entry->fhandle = nfs_fhandle_hash(&nfsi->fh); > - __entry->req = req; > + __entry->req = (unsigned long)req; > __entry->offset = req_offset(req); > __entry->count = req->wb_bytes; > __entry->flags = req->wb_flags; > ), > > TP_printk( > - "fileid=%02x:%02x:%llu fhandle=0x%08x req=%p offset=%lld count=%u flags=%s", > + "fileid=%02x:%02x:%llu fhandle=0x%08x req=0x%lx offset=%lld count=%u flags=%s", > MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev), > (unsigned long long)__entry->fileid, __entry->fhandle, > __entry->req, __entry->offset, __entry->count, > -- > 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-10 15:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-04-08 16:14 [PATCH v1 0/2] NFS: fix RCU and tracing pointer safety Sean Chang 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] NFS: fix RCU safety in nfs_compare_super_address Sean Chang 2026-04-10 15:09 ` Benjamin Coddington 2026-04-08 16:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] NFS: use unsigned long for req field in nfs_page_class Sean Chang 2026-04-10 15:23 ` Benjamin Coddington
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox