From: Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, "Jan Čípa" <jan.cipa@gooddata.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:49:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260429104938.1776671-1-igor.raits@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177745671692.1474915.5018486129724109553@noble.neil.brown.name>
After a server returns NFS4ERR_DELAY for an NFSv4 CREATE issued by
mkdir(2), the client correctly waits and retries. When the retry
succeeds, however, mkdir(2) can still surface -EEXIST to userspace
even though the directory was just created on the server.
Reproducer (random 16-hex names so collisions are not the cause)
against an in-kernel Linux nfsd; reproduces under both NFSv4.0 and
NFSv4.2:
N=2000000; base=/var/gdc/export
for ((i=1; i<=N; i++)); do
d=$base/$(openssl rand -hex 8)
mkdir "$d" 2>/dev/null || echo "$(date +%T) failed loop=$i $d"
rmdir "$d" 2>/dev/null
done
Failures cluster at the cadence at which the server-side auth/export
cache refresh path causes nfsd to return NFS4ERR_DELAY for CREATE.
A wire trace of one failure (the three CREATE RPCs all come from a
single mkdir(2), generated by the do-while in nfs4_proc_mkdir()):
client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_DELAY
~100 ms later
client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4_OK (dir created)
~80 us later
client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_EXIST (correct)
Since commit dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number
NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()"), nfs4_handle_exception() is called only
when _nfs4_proc_mkdir() returned an error. That gate breaks retry-state
hygiene: nfs4_do_handle_exception() resets exception.{delay,recovering,
retry} to 0 on entry, so calling it on success is what previously
cleared the retry flag set by the preceding NFS4ERR_DELAY iteration.
With the gate in place, exception.retry stays at 1 after the successful
retry, the loop runs once more, and the resulting CREATE for an
already-created name yields NFS4ERR_EXIST -> -EEXIST to userspace.
Drop the conditional and call nfs4_handle_exception() unconditionally,
matching every other do-while in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c (nfs4_proc_symlink(),
nfs4_proc_link(), etc.). The dentry/status separation introduced by
that commit is preserved.
Fixes: dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()")
Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Čípa <jan.cipa@gooddata.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/CA+9S74hSp_tJu2Ffe2BPNC2T25gfkhgjjDkdgSsF5c2rnJq_wA@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index a0885ae55abc..ffd14141ea1d 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5393,10 +5393,9 @@ static struct dentry *nfs4_proc_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
do {
alias = _nfs4_proc_mkdir(dir, dentry, sattr, label, &err);
trace_nfs4_mkdir(dir, &dentry->d_name, err);
+ err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir), err, &exception);
if (err)
- alias = ERR_PTR(nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir),
- err,
- &exception));
+ alias = ERR_PTR(err);
} while (exception.retry);
nfs4_label_release_security(label);
--
2.53.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 5:02 REGRESSION: NFSv4: mkdir returns EEXIST after NFS4ERR_DELAY-then-success; Igor Raits
2026-04-29 7:12 ` Igor Raits
2026-04-29 9:58 ` NeilBrown
2026-04-29 10:49 ` Igor Raits [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260429104938.1776671-1-igor.raits@gmail.com \
--to=igor.raits@gmail.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=jan.cipa@gooddata.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox