From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@meta.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/21] nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:00:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611-nfsd-testing-v2-2-5b90e276f2d9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611-nfsd-testing-v2-0-5b90e276f2d9@kernel.org>
The hand-rolled seqcount-like protocol in nfsd_nl_rpc_status_get_dumpit()
is missing a read memory barrier (smp_rmb) before its second counter
check. The standard kernel read_seqcount_retry() includes smp_rmb()
to ensure that all data reads complete before the counter is re-checked.
Without this barrier, on weakly-ordered architectures (ARM, POWER),
the CPU may reorder field reads past the second counter check, making
the retry logic ineffective: it could observe a consistent counter pair
while reading fields that have been concurrently modified by the writer.
Add smp_rmb() before the second smp_load_acquire() to match the
barrier semantics of the standard seqcount read-side.
Fixes: ac18892ea3f7 ("NFSD: add rpc_status netlink support")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
index c06d25c06f06..a4b5b1467fe2 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
@@ -1576,9 +1576,11 @@ int nfsd_nl_rpc_status_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb,
#endif /* CONFIG_NFSD_V4 */
/*
- * Acquire rq_status_counter before reporting the rqst
- * fields to the user.
+ * Ensure all field reads complete before re-checking
+ * the status counter. Pairs with the smp_store_release
+ * in nfsd_dispatch to form a seq-lock like protocol.
*/
+ smp_rmb();
if (smp_load_acquire(&rqstp->rq_status_counter) !=
status_counter)
continue;
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 20:00 [PATCH v2 00/21] nfsd: more bugfixes Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] nfsd: clear opcnt on compound arg release to prevent OOB read Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] nfsd: fix netlink dumpit error handling for rpc_status_get Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] sunrpc: defer rq_argp and rq_resp free until after RCU grace period Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] nfsd: check nfsd4_acl_to_attr() return value in nfsd4_create() Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] nfsd: add filehandle match check to nfsd4_delegreturn() Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] nfsd: validate nseconds in TIME_DELEG decode paths Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] nfsd: remove premature NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED in CLAIM_PREVIOUS path Jeff Layton
2026-06-12 13:36 ` Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] nfsd: fix version mismatch loops in nfsd_acl_init_request() Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] nfsd: fix FL_SLEEP being set unconditionally for all LOCK types Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] nfsd: add fh_want_write() for early-verified SETATTR in nfsd_proc_setattr() Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] nfsd: fix clock domain mismatch in clients_still_reclaiming() Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] nfsd: use test_and_clear_bit for somebody_reclaimed to prevent lost update Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] nfsd: reject reclaim LOCK after RECLAIM_COMPLETE Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] nfsd: validate sockaddr length per family in listener_set Jeff Layton
2026-06-12 13:37 ` Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] lockd, nfsd: RCU-protect nlmsvc_ops dispatch Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:01 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] nfsd: move nfsd_debugfs_init() after nfsd4_init_slabs() in init_nfsd() Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:01 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] nfsd: initialize DRC hash table before registering shrinker Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:01 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] nfsd: restore rq_status_counter to even on all nfsd_dispatch() exit paths Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:01 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] nfsd: reset thread skip index when advancing pools in rpc_status dumpit Jeff Layton
2026-06-11 20:01 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] nfsd: drop the stateid, not the stateowner, on seqid_op replay retry Jeff Layton
2026-06-13 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] nfsd: more bugfixes Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611-nfsd-testing-v2-2-5b90e276f2d9@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox