From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 6/8] SUNRPC: Reduce rpciod workqueue contention
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:22:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831-performance-v1-6-8d9fd9b67f96@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831-performance-v1-0-8d9fd9b67f96@kernel.org>
rpciod drives the RPC client state machine. Under heavy NFS
workloads, multiple CPUs queue RPC task completions concurrently and
contend on the UNBOUND worker pool lock. perf profiles on a 12-core
system show 30-40% of cycles lost to
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath in the rpciod pool at the
WQ_AFFN_CACHE scope (one pool per LLC). The WQ_AFFN_CACHE_SHARD
default helps little here, because its 8-core shards split this
system into just two pools of six cores each.
Set WQ_AFFN_SMT on rpciod so each SMT group gets its own pool and
lock. Most UNBOUND workqueues never contend on the pool lock and
profit from a coarser scope's cache locality. rpciod's sustained
completion traffic makes the lock a first-order bottleneck, so the
override belongs on this workqueue rather than in the system-wide
default. Idle kworkers are culled, so the extra pools cost little on
large systems.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
---
net/sunrpc/sched.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
index c31cf55b933f..b84af2c0b104 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
@@ -1266,6 +1266,25 @@ void rpciod_down(void)
module_put(THIS_MODULE);
}
+static void rpc_set_wq_smt_affinity(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ const char *name)
+{
+ struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
+ int err;
+
+ attrs = alloc_workqueue_attrs();
+ if (!attrs) {
+ pr_warn("%s: failed to allocate workqueue attrs\n", name);
+ return;
+ }
+ attrs->affn_scope = WQ_AFFN_SMT;
+ err = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, attrs);
+ free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
+ if (err)
+ pr_warn("%s: failed to set SMT affinity scope: %d\n",
+ name, err);
+}
+
/*
* Start up the rpciod workqueue.
*/
@@ -1280,6 +1299,7 @@ static int rpciod_start(void)
wq = alloc_workqueue("rpciod", wq_flags, 0);
if (!wq)
goto out_failed;
+ rpc_set_wq_smt_affinity(wq, "rpciod");
rpciod_workqueue = wq;
wq = alloc_workqueue("xprtiod", wq_flags, 0);
if (!wq)
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 18:21 [PATCH RFC 0/8] Reduce lock contention in the NFS client Chuck Lever
2026-08-31 18:21 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] SUNRPC: Use atomic_t for XID allocation Chuck Lever
2026-08-31 18:21 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] SUNRPC: Execute initial async RPC states in caller's context Chuck Lever
2026-08-31 18:21 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] SUNRPC: Split recv_lock out of xprt->queue_lock Chuck Lever
2026-08-31 18:22 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] Set WQ_SYSFS on key NFS-related workqueues Chuck Lever
2026-08-31 18:22 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] workqueue: Export the functions needed for WQ attribute modification Chuck Lever
2026-08-31 18:22 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-09-02 20:40 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] SUNRPC: Reduce rpciod workqueue contention Tim Menninger
2026-09-03 13:33 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-03 23:50 ` Tim Menninger
2026-09-04 14:13 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-04 23:23 ` Tim Menninger
2026-08-31 18:22 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] NFS: Reduce nfsiod " Chuck Lever
2026-08-31 18:22 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] SUNRPC: Reduce xprtiod " Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831-performance-v1-6-8d9fd9b67f96@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox