From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, axboe@kernel.dk, cel@kernel.org,
jlayton@kernel.org, david.flynn@hammerspace.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] block, nfsd: fixes for sub-sector bvec direct I/O
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:34:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908163448.30841-6-snitzer@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908163448.30841-1-snitzer@kernel.org>
While qualifying NFSD's NFSD_IO_DIRECT write path with byte-level data
verification, it was found that the ITER_BVEC payloads nfsd submits
expose silent data corruption in two bio-based block drivers and
two defects in nfsd itself. Example problematic payloads is the first
fragment starts mid-page because the RPC header precedes it in the
receive buffer, and fragment lengths need not be sector multiples.
bio_iov_bvec_set() passes such an array to the queue as-is; nothing
below it validates per-bvec sector alignment.
Patches 1-2 fix silent corruption (write completes successfully, data
lands wrong) and are stable candidates:
- brd re-derives each segment's device position from
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector, which bio_advance_iter_single() advances by
whole sectors only, so a sub-sector segment length skews everything
that follows.
- zram hardwires is_partial_io() to false on 4K-page kernels, sending
sub-page bvecs down a whole-page path that ignores bv_offset/bv_len
entirely, and has the same sector-cursor skew.
Both are verified with a synthetic-bio reproducer (stamped pattern,
write, read back, compare) across mid-page and page-aligned
geometries.
Patches 3-4 fix nfsd: the filecache never fetches DIO alignment
attributes on the supplied-file acquire branch, so every WRITE to a
file created via NFSv4 OPEN(CREATE) is refused direct I/O for the
file's cached lifetime; and nfsd's statx-based DIO gate is weaker than
bio_split_io_at()'s split-time checks, so an admitted iterator can
still be rejected by the block layer -- retry the segment buffered
instead of failing a valid WRITE with NFS4ERR_INVAL.
One open question for the iomap/block maintainers: should ITER_BVEC
direct I/O with sub-sector bvec boundaries be validated or bounced
centrally rather than trusted to every driver's iteration? An audit
of in-tree bio-based drivers found the same bi_sector-derived position
pattern in dm-io, dm-log-writes, dm-writecache (pmem path) and
dm-integrity -- unreachable through nfsd today only because dm queues
advertise dma_alignment >= 511, which nfsd's alignment gate refuses.
Tested with the reproducer matrix on brd, zram and nvme-loop at 4K and
16K page size (aarch64) and 4K (x86_64), plus 30-connection NFS write
rigs comparing source against export byte-for-byte: clean with the
fixes, corrupting or erroring without them.
Mike Snitzer (3):
brd: iterate the bio by byte position, not bi_sector
zram: handle sub-page bvec segments without corrupting data
nfsd: fall back to buffered I/O when a direct write gets -EINVAL
David Flynn (1):
nfsd: fetch direct I/O alignment for files handed to the filecache
drivers/block/brd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++------------------
fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 4 ++--
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 16:32 [PATCH 0/4] block, nfsd: fixes for sub-sector bvec direct I/O Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] brd: iterate the bio by byte position, not bi_sector Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] block, nfsd: fixes for sub-sector bvec direct I/O Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] brd: iterate the bio by byte position, not bi_sector Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] zram: handle sub-page bvec segments without corrupting data Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: fetch direct I/O alignment for files handed to the filecache Mike Snitzer
2026-09-09 14:11 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: fall back to buffered I/O when a direct write gets -EINVAL Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 18:25 ` Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <B3A1EA3A-00AA-4A56-A644-9AC77FF50CAF@hammerspace.com>
2026-09-09 13:44 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-09 16:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2026-09-10 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-08 16:34 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] brd: iterate the bio by byte position, not bi_sector Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] zram: handle sub-page bvec segments without corrupting data Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: fetch direct I/O alignment for files handed to the filecache Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: fall back to buffered I/O when a direct write gets -EINVAL Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] zram: handle sub-page bvec segments without corrupting data Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfsd: fetch direct I/O alignment for files handed to the filecache Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] nfsd: fall back to buffered I/O when a direct write gets -EINVAL Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 16:36 ` [PATCH 0/4] block, nfsd: fixes for sub-sector bvec direct I/O Mike Snitzer
2026-09-08 17:48 ` Chuck Lever
2026-09-08 18:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2026-09-10 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908163448.30841-6-snitzer@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=david.flynn@hammerspace.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox