From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, zlang@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] common/nfs: add management helpers
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 09:13:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909161342.GM839663@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqD4zBD06P1LJKM2@infradead.org>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 11:12:28PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 07:22:26AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > +# Start rpcbind if it is not already running.
> > > +_start_rpcbind()
> > > +{
> > > + rpcinfo -p localhost > /dev/null 2>&1 && return 0
> > > + rpcbind 2>> $seqres.full || _notrun "Cannot start rpcbind"
> > > + /usr/sbin/rpc.statd 2>> $seqres.full || _notrun "Cannot start rpc.statd"
> > > + /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd 2>> $seqres.full || _notrun "Cannot start rpc.idmapd"
> > > + /usr/sbin/nfsdcld 2>> $seqres.full || _notrun "Cannot start nfsdcld"
> >
> > Aren't these daemons usually configured as system services?
> >
> > # service rpcbind start
> >
> > etc?
>
> They usually are, but doing that as part of a test feels wrong.
> Adding the relevant maintainers and list.
<nod> I guess for this test we actually want to launch our own nfs
daemons in a separate pid / network namespace so that they don't
interfere with nfs operations outside of the test (e.g. testing nfs
itself, nfsboot, etc)
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +# Stop rpcbind.
> > > +_stop_rpcbind()
> > > +{
> > > + pkill rpcbind 2>/dev/null
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +# Start the NFS server if not already running.
> > > +_start_nfsd()
> > > +{
> > > + rpcinfo -p localhost 2>/dev/null | grep -q nfs && return 0
> > > + rpc.nfsd 2>> $seqres.full || _notrun "Cannot start rpc.nfsd"
> > > + rpc.mountd 2>> $seqres.full || _notrun "Cannot start rpc.mountd"
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +# Stop the NFS server.
> > > +_stop_nfsd()
> > > +{
> > > + rpc.nfsd 0 2>/dev/null
> > > + pkill rpc.mountd 2>/dev/null
> >
> > If the system under test has nfs filesystems mounted, won't killing
> > those daemons also break the mounts?
> >
> > I think that might break testing of nfs itself, and nfs-booted testing
> > nodes as well?
>
> Possibly. I guess if we want to save we need to launch a container
> or at least a network namespace this is bound too.
Agreed, some isolation from the main system is necessary.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260907164054.111393-1-cem@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20260907164054.111393-2-cem@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20260908142226.GL839663@frogsfrogsfrogs>
2026-09-09 6:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] common/nfs: add management helpers Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-09 16:13 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-09-10 9:45 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-09-10 11:30 ` Jeff Layton
2026-09-10 11:40 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-09-10 11:48 ` Jeff Layton
2026-09-10 11:34 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] quota evasion test and nfs helpers Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909161342.GM839663@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox