From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/10] mm: add folio_mark_dropbehind() to mark a folio dropbehind and account it
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 19:33:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261015233309.42999-8-snitzer@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015233309.42999-1-snitzer@kernel.org>
A folio allocated by an RWF_DONTCACHE write is marked dropbehind before
it is dirtied, so folio_account_dirtied() adds it to WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY
and folio_clear_dirty_for_io() or folio_account_cleaned() subtracts it
when it is cleaned. Nothing marks a folio that already exists. A
caller that sets PG_dropbehind on a folio that is already dirty
unbalances the counter: the clean subtracts what was never added, and
once the counter goes negative, wb_stat_sum() reads it as zero and the
DONTCACHE writeback kick stops writing anything back for every writer
on that bdi_writeback.
Add folio_mark_dropbehind(), the inverse of the clear in
__filemap_get_folio_mpol(): with the folio locked, mark it and, if it is
dirty, add it to WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY. The folio lock orders this
against dirtying and against folio_clear_dirty_for_io(). A concurrent
lookup without FGP_DONTCACHE that clears the flag again subtracts what
this added.
The name follows folio_set_dirty() and folio_mark_dirty(): the first
only sets PG_dirty, the second also accounts the dirty folio.
folio_set_dropbehind() likewise only sets PG_dropbehind, and
folio_mark_dropbehind() also accounts it in WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY.
A later commit uses it in NFSD to drop a page shared by two misaligned
WRITEs once both have written it.
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/pagemap.h | 1 +
mm/filemap.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 0adfa6605653d..3012bd95812a1 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -1310,6 +1310,7 @@ void end_page_writeback(struct page *page);
void folio_end_writeback(struct folio *folio);
void folio_end_writeback_no_dropbehind(struct folio *folio);
void folio_end_dropbehind(struct folio *folio);
+void folio_mark_dropbehind(struct folio *folio);
void folio_wait_stable(struct folio *folio);
void __folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *, int warn);
void folio_account_cleaned(struct folio *folio, struct bdi_writeback *wb);
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 00fd89cf6f550..ed7e4dbea653f 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -1644,6 +1644,37 @@ void folio_end_dropbehind(struct folio *folio)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(folio_end_dropbehind);
+/**
+ * folio_mark_dropbehind - mark an existing folio dropbehind
+ * @folio: the folio, locked by the caller
+ *
+ * Mark @folio so that the writeback that cleans it drops it. A folio that
+ * is already dirty is added to WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY, as folio_account_dirtied()
+ * would have added it had it been marked when dirtied, so that the clean
+ * that subtracts it leaves the counter balanced.
+ */
+void folio_mark_dropbehind(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ struct address_space *mapping = folio->mapping;
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+
+ if (folio_test_dropbehind(folio))
+ return;
+ folio_set_dropbehind(folio);
+ if (mapping && folio_test_dirty(folio) &&
+ mapping_can_writeback(mapping)) {
+ struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
+ struct bdi_writeback *wb;
+ struct wb_lock_cookie cookie = {};
+
+ wb = unlocked_inode_to_wb_begin(inode, &cookie);
+ wb_stat_mod(wb, WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY, folio_nr_pages(folio));
+ unlocked_inode_to_wb_end(inode, &cookie);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(folio_mark_dropbehind);
+
/**
* folio_end_writeback_no_dropbehind - End writeback against a folio.
* @folio: The folio.
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 23:32 [PATCH v4 00/10] NFSD: keep direct-mode I/O out of the page cache Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] NFSD: cut a misaligned direct-mode WRITE at page boundaries Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] NFSD: mark the direct middle of a split WRITE IOCB_DONTCACHE as well Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] NFSD: only split a direct-mode WRITE for a worthwhile direct middle Mike Snitzer
2026-10-16 11:03 ` Jeff Layton
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] NFSD: add direct_misaligned_dontcache debugfs knob Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] NFSD: do not use direct I/O for a READ smaller than its alignment Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] NFSD: persist a synchronous direct-mode WRITE once, after all of its segments Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2026-10-16 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] mm: add folio_mark_dropbehind() to mark a folio dropbehind and account it Jeff Layton
2026-10-16 11:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] mm: expose WB_DONTCACHE_DIRTY in bdi debugfs stats Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] NFSD: keep boundary page of a split direct-mode WRITE until both writers complete Mike Snitzer
2026-10-15 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] NFSD: add tracing for how direct-mode READ and WRITE are serviced Mike Snitzer
2026-10-16 11:18 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] NFSD: keep direct-mode I/O out of the page cache Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261015233309.42999-8-snitzer@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox