From: VeroFess <coderzeng@gmail.com>
To: cel@kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NFSD: Apply export security when a compound crosses exports
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 04:32:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104203213.1214721-1-coderzeng@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103-verofess-2-v1-0-9e6568221beb@kernel.org>
Chuck,
I tested the five patches on an x86-64 KASAN guest. They applied in
order, the changed NFSD objects built with W=1, and the full bzImage
built with Btrfs, TLS, and NFSv4.2 inter-server COPY enabled.
The wire tests covered NFSv4.0, 4.1, and 4.2 where applicable.
After a reserved-port OPEN, high-port AUTH_SYS compounds that used
LOOKUP before READ, COPY, or CLONE stopped at LOOKUP with WRONGSEC.
The destination was unchanged. Direct PUTFH returned WRONGSEC, while
low-port COPY and CLONE succeeded. SECINFO and SECINFO_NO_NAME still
succeeded on the high port. READDIR with rdattr_error omitted the
protected filehandle.
After switching the source export to root_squash, LOOKUP; READ,
RESTOREFH; READ, and saved-source COPY/CLONE returned ACCESS with the
old OPEN stateid. The all_squash UID/GID cases and same-export
COPY/CLONE passed with the expected data.
With krb5 or krb5i on a krb5p export, OPEN by filehandle returned
WRONGSEC at PUTFH; OPEN by name returned it at OPEN. krb5p worked from
a high port and over TLS. NFSv3 LOOKUP returned PERM from a high port
and succeeded from a reserved port. I saw no KASAN report or oops in
the guest log.
Tested-by: VeroFess <coderzeng@gmail.com>
VeroFess
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 19:52 [PATCH 0/5] NFSD: Apply export security when a compound crosses exports Chuck Lever
2026-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFSD: Check the secure-port policy when entering an export Chuck Lever
2026-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] NFSD: Defer the PUTFH secure-port check Chuck Lever
2026-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFSD: Report WRONGSEC from PUTFH when OPEN uses the current filehandle Chuck Lever
2026-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFSD: Apply the entered export's credentials after LOOKUP and RESTOREFH Chuck Lever
2026-11-03 19:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] NFSD: Use each export's credentials for the COPY and CLONE stateids Chuck Lever
2026-11-04 20:32 ` VeroFess [this message]
2026-11-04 21:06 ` [PATCH 0/5] NFSD: Apply export security when a compound crosses exports Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261104203213.1214721-1-coderzeng@gmail.com \
--to=coderzeng@gmail.com \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox