public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: use dynamic allocation for oversized NFSv4.0 replay cache
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:42:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20cd1871-581d-4fdd-b4fe-10684719c419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <887c1ca78b34974160dee3ce7f25d6d077da93ab.camel@kernel.org>

On 2/24/26 2:39 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-02-24 at 14:33 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>
>> Commit 1e8e9913672a ("nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK
>> replay cache") capped the replay cache copy at NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE
>> to prevent a heap overflow, but set rp_buflen to zero when the
>> encoded response exceeded the inline buffer. A retransmitted LOCK
>> reaching the replay path then produced only a status code with no
>> operation body, resulting in a malformed XDR response.
>>
>> When the encoded response exceeds the 112-byte inline rp_ibuf, a
>> buffer is kmalloc'd to hold it. If the allocation fails, rp_buflen
>> remains zero, preserving the behavior from the capped-copy fix.
>> The buffer is freed when the stateowner is released or when a
>> subsequent operation's response fits in the inline buffer.
>>
>> Fixes: 1e8e9913672a ("nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache")
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c   | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>>  fs/nfsd/state.h     | 12 +++++++-----
>>  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index ba49f49bb93b..b4d0e82b2690 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -1496,8 +1496,24 @@ release_all_access(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * nfs4_replay_free_cache - release dynamically allocated replay buffer
>> + * @rp: replay cache to reset
>> + *
>> + * If @rp->rp_buf points to a kmalloc'd buffer, free it and reset
>> + * rp_buf to the inline rp_ibuf. Always zeroes rp_buflen.
>> + */
>> +void nfs4_replay_free_cache(struct nfs4_replay *rp)
>> +{
>> +	if (rp->rp_buf != rp->rp_ibuf)
>> +		kfree(rp->rp_buf);
>> +	rp->rp_buf = rp->rp_ibuf;
>> +	rp->rp_buflen = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static inline void nfs4_free_stateowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
>>  {
>> +	nfs4_replay_free_cache(&sop->so_replay);
>>  	kfree(sop->so_owner.data);
>>  	sop->so_ops->so_free(sop);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> index 690f7a3122ec..2a0946c630e1 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> @@ -6282,14 +6282,23 @@ nfsd4_encode_operation(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, struct nfsd4_op *op)
>>  		int len = xdr->buf->len - (op_status_offset + XDR_UNIT);
>>  
>>  		so->so_replay.rp_status = op->status;
>> -		if (len <= NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE) {
>> -			so->so_replay.rp_buflen = len;
>> -			read_bytes_from_xdr_buf(xdr->buf,
>> -						op_status_offset + XDR_UNIT,
>> -						so->so_replay.rp_buf, len);
>> -		} else {
>> -			so->so_replay.rp_buflen = 0;
>> +		if (len > NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE) {
>> +			char *buf = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> +			nfs4_replay_free_cache(&so->so_replay);
>> +			if (buf) {
>> +				so->so_replay.rp_buf = buf;
>> +			} else {
>> +				/* rp_buflen already zeroed; skip caching */
>> +				goto status;
>> +			}
>> +		} else if (so->so_replay.rp_buf != so->so_replay.rp_ibuf) {
>> +			nfs4_replay_free_cache(&so->so_replay);
>>  		}
>> +		so->so_replay.rp_buflen = len;
>> +		read_bytes_from_xdr_buf(xdr->buf,
>> +					op_status_offset + XDR_UNIT,
>> +					so->so_replay.rp_buf, len);
>>  	}
>>  status:
>>  	op->status = nfsd4_map_status(op->status,
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> index 3159c7b67f50..9b05462da4cc 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> @@ -554,10 +554,10 @@ struct nfs4_client_reclaim {
>>   *   ~32(deleg. ace) = 112 bytes
>>   *
>>   * Some responses can exceed this. A LOCK denial includes the conflicting
>> - * lock owner, which can be up to 1024 bytes (NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT). Responses
>> - * larger than REPLAY_ISIZE are not cached in rp_ibuf; only rp_status is
>> - * saved. Enlarging this constant increases the size of every
>> - * nfs4_stateowner.
>> + * lock owner, which can be up to 1024 bytes (NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT). When a
>> + * response exceeds REPLAY_ISIZE, a buffer is dynamically allocated. If
>> + * that allocation fails, only rp_status is saved. Enlarging this constant
>> + * increases the size of every nfs4_stateowner.
>>   */
>>  
>>  #define NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE       112 
>> @@ -569,12 +569,14 @@ struct nfs4_client_reclaim {
>>  struct nfs4_replay {
>>  	__be32			rp_status;
>>  	unsigned int		rp_buflen;
>> -	char			*rp_buf;
>> +	char			*rp_buf; /* rp_ibuf or kmalloc'd */
>>  	struct knfsd_fh		rp_openfh;
>>  	int			rp_locked;
>>  	char			rp_ibuf[NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE];
>>  };
>>  
>> +extern void nfs4_replay_free_cache(struct nfs4_replay *rp);
>> +
>>  struct nfs4_stateowner;
>>  
>>  struct nfs4_stateowner_operations {
> 
> 
> Certainly a reasonable approach if we care about full correctness when
> dealing with a large lockowner on NFSv4.0. Do we?

The idea would be to either:

o Backport your fix and not this update, or
o Squash these two together, and backport both

Admittedly this is a narrow corner case for a minor version that is
destined for the scrap heap.


-- 
Chuck Lever

  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-24 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-24 19:33 [PATCH] nfsd: use dynamic allocation for oversized NFSv4.0 replay cache Chuck Lever
2026-02-24 19:39 ` Jeff Layton
2026-02-24 19:42   ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-02-24 19:51     ` Jeff Layton
2026-02-24 19:53       ` Chuck Lever
2026-02-24 19:59         ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20cd1871-581d-4fdd-b4fe-10684719c419@kernel.org \
    --to=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@ownmail.net \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox