From: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: use dynamic allocation for oversized NFSv4.0 replay cache
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:42:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20cd1871-581d-4fdd-b4fe-10684719c419@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <887c1ca78b34974160dee3ce7f25d6d077da93ab.camel@kernel.org>
On 2/24/26 2:39 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-02-24 at 14:33 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>
>> Commit 1e8e9913672a ("nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK
>> replay cache") capped the replay cache copy at NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE
>> to prevent a heap overflow, but set rp_buflen to zero when the
>> encoded response exceeded the inline buffer. A retransmitted LOCK
>> reaching the replay path then produced only a status code with no
>> operation body, resulting in a malformed XDR response.
>>
>> When the encoded response exceeds the 112-byte inline rp_ibuf, a
>> buffer is kmalloc'd to hold it. If the allocation fails, rp_buflen
>> remains zero, preserving the behavior from the capped-copy fix.
>> The buffer is freed when the stateowner is released or when a
>> subsequent operation's response fits in the inline buffer.
>>
>> Fixes: 1e8e9913672a ("nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache")
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++-------
>> fs/nfsd/state.h | 12 +++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> index ba49f49bb93b..b4d0e82b2690 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
>> @@ -1496,8 +1496,24 @@ release_all_access(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * nfs4_replay_free_cache - release dynamically allocated replay buffer
>> + * @rp: replay cache to reset
>> + *
>> + * If @rp->rp_buf points to a kmalloc'd buffer, free it and reset
>> + * rp_buf to the inline rp_ibuf. Always zeroes rp_buflen.
>> + */
>> +void nfs4_replay_free_cache(struct nfs4_replay *rp)
>> +{
>> + if (rp->rp_buf != rp->rp_ibuf)
>> + kfree(rp->rp_buf);
>> + rp->rp_buf = rp->rp_ibuf;
>> + rp->rp_buflen = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline void nfs4_free_stateowner(struct nfs4_stateowner *sop)
>> {
>> + nfs4_replay_free_cache(&sop->so_replay);
>> kfree(sop->so_owner.data);
>> sop->so_ops->so_free(sop);
>> }
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> index 690f7a3122ec..2a0946c630e1 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
>> @@ -6282,14 +6282,23 @@ nfsd4_encode_operation(struct nfsd4_compoundres *resp, struct nfsd4_op *op)
>> int len = xdr->buf->len - (op_status_offset + XDR_UNIT);
>>
>> so->so_replay.rp_status = op->status;
>> - if (len <= NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE) {
>> - so->so_replay.rp_buflen = len;
>> - read_bytes_from_xdr_buf(xdr->buf,
>> - op_status_offset + XDR_UNIT,
>> - so->so_replay.rp_buf, len);
>> - } else {
>> - so->so_replay.rp_buflen = 0;
>> + if (len > NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE) {
>> + char *buf = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + nfs4_replay_free_cache(&so->so_replay);
>> + if (buf) {
>> + so->so_replay.rp_buf = buf;
>> + } else {
>> + /* rp_buflen already zeroed; skip caching */
>> + goto status;
>> + }
>> + } else if (so->so_replay.rp_buf != so->so_replay.rp_ibuf) {
>> + nfs4_replay_free_cache(&so->so_replay);
>> }
>> + so->so_replay.rp_buflen = len;
>> + read_bytes_from_xdr_buf(xdr->buf,
>> + op_status_offset + XDR_UNIT,
>> + so->so_replay.rp_buf, len);
>> }
>> status:
>> op->status = nfsd4_map_status(op->status,
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/state.h b/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> index 3159c7b67f50..9b05462da4cc 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/state.h
>> @@ -554,10 +554,10 @@ struct nfs4_client_reclaim {
>> * ~32(deleg. ace) = 112 bytes
>> *
>> * Some responses can exceed this. A LOCK denial includes the conflicting
>> - * lock owner, which can be up to 1024 bytes (NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT). Responses
>> - * larger than REPLAY_ISIZE are not cached in rp_ibuf; only rp_status is
>> - * saved. Enlarging this constant increases the size of every
>> - * nfs4_stateowner.
>> + * lock owner, which can be up to 1024 bytes (NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT). When a
>> + * response exceeds REPLAY_ISIZE, a buffer is dynamically allocated. If
>> + * that allocation fails, only rp_status is saved. Enlarging this constant
>> + * increases the size of every nfs4_stateowner.
>> */
>>
>> #define NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE 112
>> @@ -569,12 +569,14 @@ struct nfs4_client_reclaim {
>> struct nfs4_replay {
>> __be32 rp_status;
>> unsigned int rp_buflen;
>> - char *rp_buf;
>> + char *rp_buf; /* rp_ibuf or kmalloc'd */
>> struct knfsd_fh rp_openfh;
>> int rp_locked;
>> char rp_ibuf[NFSD4_REPLAY_ISIZE];
>> };
>>
>> +extern void nfs4_replay_free_cache(struct nfs4_replay *rp);
>> +
>> struct nfs4_stateowner;
>>
>> struct nfs4_stateowner_operations {
>
>
> Certainly a reasonable approach if we care about full correctness when
> dealing with a large lockowner on NFSv4.0. Do we?
The idea would be to either:
o Backport your fix and not this update, or
o Squash these two together, and backport both
Admittedly this is a narrow corner case for a minor version that is
destined for the scrap heap.
--
Chuck Lever
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 19:33 [PATCH] nfsd: use dynamic allocation for oversized NFSv4.0 replay cache Chuck Lever
2026-02-24 19:39 ` Jeff Layton
2026-02-24 19:42 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2026-02-24 19:51 ` Jeff Layton
2026-02-24 19:53 ` Chuck Lever
2026-02-24 19:59 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20cd1871-581d-4fdd-b4fe-10684719c419@kernel.org \
--to=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox