From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com" <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com" <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"agruenba@redhat.com" <agruenba@redhat.com>,
"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] nfs: NFSv3: fix SGID bit dropped when inheriting ACLs
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 13:13:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26c10bd670d4a4672470baf2c30db7af7b7aa593.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624430335-10322-2-git-send-email-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 14:38 +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> generic/444 fails with NFSv3 as shown above, "
> QA output created by 444
> drwxrwsr-x
> -drwxrwsr-x
> +drwxrwxr-x
> ", which tests "SGID inheritance with default ACLs" fs regression
> and looks after the following commits:
>
> a3bb2d558752 ("ext4: Don't clear SGID when inheriting ACLs")
> 073931017b49 ("posix_acl: Clear SGID bit when setting file
> permissions")
>
> commit 055ffbea0596 ("[PATCH] NFS: Fix handling of the umask when
> an NFSv3 default acl is present.") sets acls explicitly when
> when files are created in a directory that has a default ACL.
> However, after commit a3bb2d558752 and 073931017b49, SGID can be
> dropped if user is not member of the owning group with
> set_posix_acl() called.
>
> Since underlayfs will handle ACL inheritance when creating
> files in a directory that has the default ACL and the umask is
> supposed to be ignored for such case. Therefore, I think no need
> to set acls explicitly (to avoid SGID bit cleared) but only apply
> client umask if the default ACL of the parent directory doesn't
> exist.
Hmm... Has this patch been tested with a Solaris server? Your assertion
above appears to be true for Linux servers, but this code needs to
interoperate with non-Linux draft posix acl compatible servers too.
I've already taken the other patch in this series, since that one
appears correct, and doesn't have any interoperability consequences.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-23 6:38 [PATCH v2 1/2] nfs: fix acl memory leak of posix_acl_create() Gao Xiang
2021-06-23 6:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nfs: NFSv3: fix SGID bit dropped when inheriting ACLs Gao Xiang
2021-06-24 13:13 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2021-06-24 15:48 ` Gao Xiang
2021-06-24 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nfs: fix acl memory leak of posix_acl_create() Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26c10bd670d4a4672470baf2c30db7af7b7aa593.camel@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox