public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	cel@kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] NFSD: Never return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN when removing a directory
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 16:06:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a55bf53-dc35-49bf-bcd0-b76999e1ef34@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8565d8e45073f76705a23e00eedd4d911f24a360.camel@kernel.org>

On 1/23/25 3:43 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 14:52 -0500, cel@kernel.org wrote:
>> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>>
>> RFC 8881 Section 18.25.4 paragraph 5 tells us that the server
>> should return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN only if the target object is an
>> opened file. This suggests that returning this status when removing
>> a directory will confuse NFS clients.
>>
>> This is a version-specific issue; nfsd_proc_remove/rmdir() and
>> nfsd3_proc_remove/rmdir() already return nfserr_access as
>> appropriate.
>>
>> Unfortunately there is no quick way for nfsd4_remove() to determine
>> whether the target object is a file or not, so the check is done in
>> to nfsd_unlink() for now.
>>
>> Reported-by: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
>> Fixes: 466e16f0920f ("nfsd: check for EBUSY from vfs_rmdir/vfs_unink.")
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
>> index 2d8e27c225f9..3ead7fb3bf04 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
>> @@ -1931,9 +1931,17 @@ nfsd_rename(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *ffhp, char *fname, int flen,
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>>   
>> -/*
>> - * Unlink a file or directory
>> - * N.B. After this call fhp needs an fh_put
>> +/**
>> + * nfsd_unlink - remove a directory entry
>> + * @rqstp: RPC transaction context
>> + * @fhp: the file handle of the parent directory to be modified
>> + * @type: enforced file type of the object to be removed
>> + * @fname: the name of directory entry to be removed
>> + * @flen: length of @fname in octets
>> + *
>> + * After this call fhp needs an fh_put.
>> + *
>> + * Returns a generic NFS status code in network byte-order.
>>    */
>>   __be32
>>   nfsd_unlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, int type,
>> @@ -2007,10 +2015,14 @@ nfsd_unlink(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, int type,
>>   	fh_drop_write(fhp);
>>   out_nfserr:
>>   	if (host_err == -EBUSY) {
>> -		/* name is mounted-on. There is no perfect
>> -		 * error status.
>> +		/*
>> +		 * See RFC 8881 Section 18.25.4 para 4: NFSv4 REMOVE
>> +		 * distinguishes between reg file and dir.
>>   		 */
>> -		err = nfserr_file_open;
>> +		if (type != S_IFDIR)
> 
> Should that be "if (type == S_ISREG)" instead? What if the inode is a
> named pipe or device file? I'm not sure you can ever get EBUSY with
> those, but in case you can, what's the right error in those cases?

Check out nfsd_unlink()'s callers to see what they pass as the type
parameter. Unfortunately we have to compare against S_IFDIR here.


>> +			err = nfserr_file_open;
>> +		else
>> +			err = nfserr_acces;
>>   	}
>>   out:
>>   	return err != nfs_ok ? err : nfserrno(host_err);
> 


-- 
Chuck Lever

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-23 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-23 19:52 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Avoid returning NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN when not appropriate cel
2025-01-23 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] NFSD: nfsd_unlink() clobbers non-zero status returned from fh_fill_pre_attrs() cel
2025-01-23 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] NFSD: Never return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN when removing a directory cel
2025-01-23 20:43   ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-23 21:06     ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-01-24 10:42       ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-24 14:11         ` Chuck Lever
2025-01-23 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] NFSD: Return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN only when renaming over an open file cel
2025-01-24 10:47   ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-23 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] NFSD: Return NFS4ERR_FILE_OPEN only when linking " cel
2025-01-23 20:52   ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-24 11:22     ` Amir Goldstein
2025-01-24 14:04       ` Chuck Lever
2025-01-24 20:36         ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2a55bf53-dc35-49bf-bcd0-b76999e1ef34@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox