Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] cachefiles: Use lookup_one() rather than lookup_one_len()
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:49:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3170280.1742478565@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250320-goldbarren-brauhaus-6d6ff0a7be72@brauner>

Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:

> > > It also uses the lookup_one_len() family of functions which implicitly
> > > use &nop_mnt_idmap.  This mixture of implicit and explicit could be
> > > confusing.  When we eventually update cachefiles to support idmap mounts
> > > it
> > 
> > Is that something we ever plan to do?
> 
> It should be pretty easy to do. I just didn't see a reason to do it yet.
> 
> Fwiw, the cache paths that cachefiles uses aren't private mounts like
> overlayfs does it, i.e., cachefiles doesn't do clone_private_mount() before
> stashing cache->mnt. ...

This is probably something cachefilesd needs to do in userspace before telling
the kernel through /dev/cachefiles where to find the cache.

David


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-20 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19  3:01 [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] tidy up various VFS lookup functions NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] VFS: improve interface for lookup_one functions NeilBrown
2025-03-19  8:40   ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-20 10:17   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-20 14:04   ` David Howells
2025-03-22  0:29     ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:18     ` NeilBrown
2025-04-04 13:41       ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-04 13:46         ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-04 23:00           ` NeilBrown
2025-03-22  0:27   ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:14     ` NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: Use lookup_one() rather than lookup_one_len() NeilBrown
2025-03-19 13:04   ` Chuck Lever
2025-03-20 10:19   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] cachefiles: " NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:22   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-20 12:05     ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-20 13:49       ` David Howells [this message]
2025-03-20 14:04         ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] VFS: rename lookup_one_len family to lookup_noperm and remove permission check NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:29   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-22  0:34   ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:31     ` NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] Use try_lookup_noperm() instead of d_hash_and_lookup() outside of VFS NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:45   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-22  0:39   ` Al Viro
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] VFS: change lookup_one_common and lookup_noperm_common to take a qstr NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:46   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-19  8:42 ` [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] tidy up various VFS lookup functions Christian Brauner
2025-03-19  9:23   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3170280.1742478565@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox