From: Danny Smith <dannys@cinesite.co.uk>
To: nfs <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Iain Irwin-Powell <Iain@cinesite.co.uk>
Subject: NFSERR_EAGAIN
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:29:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F0DB088.303@cinesite.co.uk> (raw)
I've been trying to resolve some issues we have with a set of systems
running 2.4.20+NFS_ALL, dual CPU and Gigabit Ethernet. They're talking
to SGI IRIX servers, (6.5.19), and having intermittent problems - this
can be seen sometimes where an NFS mounted directory will "disappear",
but subsequently be accessible. No errors are returned to the shell -
the directory just appears to have no entries.
This seems (although I don't have proof positive yet, more testing is in
progrees) to coincide with errors in the logs:
Jul 9 14:18:09 trout-node13 kernel: nfs_stat_to_errno: bad nfs status
return value: 11
Looking through nfs2xdr.c and nfs.h and googling, it seems that error
number 11 is not properly defined, but certainly seems to be in use by
SGI. From nfs2xdr.c:
{ NFSERR_NXIO, ENXIO },
/* { NFSERR_EAGAIN, EAGAIN }, */
{ NFSERR_ACCES, EACCES },
(EAGAIN having value 11)
Does anyone know much about the history of this? Was this removed in
order to be RFC compliant, or is there a stronger motivation not to have
this?
It would maybe explain what I'm seeing if SGI are interpreting error 11
as "Try again" - this mainly happens when server load is high.
Any insight into this would be welcome - meanwhile I'm going to try some
tests with NFSERR_EGAIN put back in.
Danny
--
Danny Smith
Senior Systems Administrator, Cinesite (Europe) Ltd
020 7973 4000 - x4055 / dannys@cinesite.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more.
Download & eval WebKing and get a free book.
www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps1
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next reply other threads:[~2003-07-10 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-10 18:29 Danny Smith [this message]
2003-07-10 22:41 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Trond Myklebust
2003-07-11 9:55 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Danny Smith
2003-07-11 10:13 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN Trond Myklebust
2003-07-16 15:53 ` NFSERR_EAGAIN - resolved Danny Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F0DB088.303@cinesite.co.uk \
--to=dannys@cinesite.co.uk \
--cc=Iain@cinesite.co.uk \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox