From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@RedHat.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access cache forgetting mode bits
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 23:22:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F52BB88.2040303@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062372316.2341.16.camel@bree.suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 905 bytes --]
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 22:33, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I'm thinking there might even be a better way to cache these bits...
>>
>>It seems the OS calls nfs_permission() to test each permission
>>
>>
>
>Individually you mean? That's not at all the case in general.
>
Yes... So at times there will be more than one bit set in the mask?
I know that's how it works in other OS but I was not sure with linux...
>>what if on the first access call, we get *all* of the access bits
>>from the
>>server and cache them locally (i.e. in cache->mask). That way when
>>nfs_permission()
>>is called again, all if the needed info is there... The attached patch
>>does just that
>>and it really seems to cut down on the amount access rpc needed...
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>
>>
>
>You have again attached your first, buggy patch.
>
>
Oops... I hate when that happens....
SteveD.
[-- Attachment #2: linux-2.4.21-nfs-accesscache.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3393 bytes --]
--- linux-2.4.21/fs/nfs/dir.c.orig 2003-08-31 13:04:30.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.4.21/fs/nfs/dir.c 2003-08-31 13:07:49.000000000 -0400
@@ -1259,17 +1259,21 @@ nfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int
if ((server->flags & NFS_MOUNT_NOACL) || !NFS_PROTO(inode)->access)
goto out_notsup;
+ /*
+ * See if we can use the cache
+ */
cred = rpcauth_lookupcred(NFS_CLIENT(inode)->cl_auth, 0);
if (cache->cred == cred
&& time_before(jiffies, cache->jiffies + NFS_ATTRTIMEO(inode))) {
- if (!cache->err) {
- /* Is the mask a subset of an accepted mask? */
- if ((cache->mask & mask) == mask)
- goto out_cached;
- } else {
- /* ...or is it a superset of a rejected mask? */
- if ((cache->mask & mask) == cache->mask)
- goto out_cached;
+ /* Is the mask a subset of an accepted mask? */
+ if ((cache->mask & mask) == mask) {
+ cache->err = 0;
+ goto out_cached;
+ }
+ /* ...or is it a superset of a rejected mask? */
+ if ((~cache->mask & mask) == mask) {
+ cache->err = -EACCES;
+ goto out_cached;
}
}
error = NFS_PROTO(inode)->access(inode, cred, mask);
@@ -1278,8 +1282,6 @@ nfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int
if (cache->cred)
put_rpccred(cache->cred);
cache->cred = cred;
- cache->mask = mask;
- cache->err = error;
return error;
}
put_rpccred(cred);
--- linux-2.4.21/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c.orig 2003-08-30 16:30:57.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.4.21/fs/nfs/nfs3proc.c 2003-08-31 12:58:11.000000000 -0400
@@ -121,10 +121,13 @@ static int
nfs3_proc_access(struct inode *inode, struct rpc_cred *cred, int mode)
{
struct nfs_fattr fattr;
+ struct nfs_access_cache *cache = &NFS_I(inode)->cache_access;
struct nfs3_accessargs arg = { NFS_FH(inode), 0 };
struct nfs3_accessres res = { &fattr, 0 };
struct rpc_message msg = { NFS3PROC_ACCESS, &arg, &res, cred };
int status;
+ static int may_write, may_exec;
+ __u32 access;
dprintk("NFS call access\n");
fattr.valid = 0;
@@ -134,20 +137,45 @@ nfs3_proc_access(struct inode *inode, st
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
if (mode & MAY_WRITE)
arg.access |= NFS3_ACCESS_MODIFY | NFS3_ACCESS_EXTEND | NFS3_ACCESS_DELETE;
+ may_write = NFS3_ACCESS_MODIFY| NFS3_ACCESS_EXTEND | NFS3_ACCESS_DELETE;
+
if (mode & MAY_EXEC)
arg.access |= NFS3_ACCESS_LOOKUP;
+ may_exec = NFS3_ACCESS_LOOKUP;
+
} else {
if (mode & MAY_WRITE)
arg.access |= NFS3_ACCESS_MODIFY | NFS3_ACCESS_EXTEND;
+ may_write = NFS3_ACCESS_MODIFY | NFS3_ACCESS_EXTEND;
+
if (mode & MAY_EXEC)
arg.access |= NFS3_ACCESS_EXECUTE;
+ may_exec = NFS3_ACCESS_EXECUTE;
}
+ /*
+ * Save off whats needed and then ask for all of the mode bits
+ * which will be cached
+ */
+ access = arg.access;
+ arg.access = (NFS3_ACCESS_EXECUTE|NFS3_ACCESS_READ|NFS3_ACCESS_MODIFY|
+ NFS3_ACCESS_EXTEND|NFS3_ACCESS_DELETE|NFS3_ACCESS_LOOKUP);
+
status = rpc_call_sync(NFS_CLIENT(inode), &msg, 0);
nfs_refresh_inode(inode, &fattr);
dprintk("NFS reply access\n");
- if (status == 0 && (arg.access & res.access) != arg.access)
+ if (status == 0 && (access & res.access) != access)
status = -EACCES;
+
+ if ((!status || status == -EACCES)) {
+ cache->mask = 0;
+ if (res.access & NFS3_ACCESS_READ)
+ cache->mask |= MAY_READ;
+ if (res.access & may_write)
+ cache->mask |= MAY_WRITE;
+ if (res.access & may_exec)
+ cache->mask |= MAY_EXEC;
+ }
return status;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-28 16:39 [PATCH] Access cache forgetting mode bits Steve Dickson
2003-08-28 21:51 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2003-08-29 13:14 ` Steve Dickson
2003-08-31 20:33 ` Steve Dickson
2003-08-31 23:25 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2003-09-01 3:22 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2003-09-01 3:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-09-01 13:13 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F52BB88.2040303@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=okir@suse.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox