Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Holmes <jholmes@psu.edu>
To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:37:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB520E4.133AF7DB@psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 16308.8254.89284.377113@charged.uio.no

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
> IOW this all appears to be doing synchronous I/O only (both in the
> case of 2.4.22 and 2.6.0).
> Note: most of these RPC calls do indeed appear to be something other
> than WRITE calls. Are they perhaps GETATTR calls? Have you for
> instance set 'noac', 'actimeo' or something like that?

This was my mistake - I had changed the export to sync for a test right
before the debug runs and forgot to change it back.

> Could you please try using
> 
> echo "9" >/proc/sys/sunrpc/nfs_debug

Files should be up there (http://magicbus.cac.psu.edu/nfs).  I do have
to admit that something odd is going on - 2.4.22 still is faster than
2.6.0-test9-bk17 and test9-bk17 is still showing the large amount of
commits, but both of them are running faster than they did before on the
sync mounts and I'm not sure what I might have changed to cause this.

Thanks,

--
Jason Holmes


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-14 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-12 18:05 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 20:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-12 20:51   ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 21:18     ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-12 21:33       ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 23:22         ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13  1:20           ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13  2:07             ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 14:16               ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 21:55                 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-14  0:22                   ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-14 18:37                     ` Jason Holmes [this message]
2003-11-14 21:11                       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-16 15:54                         ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 15:56               ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 17:55                 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 18:59                   ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 19:09                     ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 19:28                       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 19:18                     ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 22:08 ` Eric Whiting
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-13 19:42 Duc Vianney
2003-11-13 20:02 ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FB520E4.133AF7DB@psu.edu \
    --to=jholmes@psu.edu \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox