* [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions
2024-04-03 8:06 [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings Arnd Bergmann
@ 2024-04-03 8:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-03 8:59 ` Jeff Layton
2024-04-03 13:20 ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-06 5:20 ` [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2024-04-03 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, Chuck Lever,
Jeff Layton, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, NeilBrown, J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs,
netdev
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
There is a warning about unused variables when building with W=1 and no procfs:
net/sunrpc/cache.c:1660:30: error: 'cache_flush_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
1660 | static const struct proc_ops cache_flush_proc_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/sunrpc/cache.c:1622:30: error: 'content_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
1622 | static const struct proc_ops content_proc_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/sunrpc/cache.c:1598:30: error: 'cache_channel_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
1598 | static const struct proc_ops cache_channel_proc_ops = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These are used inside of an #ifdef, so replacing that with an
IS_ENABLED() check lets the compiler see how they are used while
still dropping them during dead code elimination.
Fixes: dbf847ecb631 ("knfsd: allow cache_register to return error on failure")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
net/sunrpc/cache.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index 95ff74706104..ab3a57965dc0 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -1673,12 +1673,14 @@ static void remove_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd)
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *p;
struct sunrpc_net *sn;
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS))
+ return 0;
+
sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id);
cd->procfs = proc_mkdir(cd->name, sn->proc_net_rpc);
if (cd->procfs == NULL)
@@ -1706,12 +1708,6 @@ static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
remove_cache_proc_entries(cd);
return -ENOMEM;
}
-#else /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
-static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
void __init cache_initialize(void)
{
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions
2024-04-03 8:06 ` [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions Arnd Bergmann
@ 2024-04-03 8:59 ` Jeff Layton
2024-04-03 13:20 ` Chuck Lever
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-04-03 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker,
Chuck Lever, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, NeilBrown, J. Bruce Fields
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs,
netdev
On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 10:06 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> There is a warning about unused variables when building with W=1 and no procfs:
>
> net/sunrpc/cache.c:1660:30: error: 'cache_flush_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 1660 | static const struct proc_ops cache_flush_proc_ops = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> net/sunrpc/cache.c:1622:30: error: 'content_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 1622 | static const struct proc_ops content_proc_ops = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> net/sunrpc/cache.c:1598:30: error: 'cache_channel_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 1598 | static const struct proc_ops cache_channel_proc_ops = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> These are used inside of an #ifdef, so replacing that with an
> IS_ENABLED() check lets the compiler see how they are used while
> still dropping them during dead code elimination.
>
> Fixes: dbf847ecb631 ("knfsd: allow cache_register to return error on failure")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/cache.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> index 95ff74706104..ab3a57965dc0 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> @@ -1673,12 +1673,14 @@ static void remove_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd)
> }
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
> {
> struct proc_dir_entry *p;
> struct sunrpc_net *sn;
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS))
> + return 0;
> +
> sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id);
> cd->procfs = proc_mkdir(cd->name, sn->proc_net_rpc);
> if (cd->procfs == NULL)
> @@ -1706,12 +1708,6 @@ static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
> remove_cache_proc_entries(cd);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> -#else /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
> -static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>
> void __init cache_initialize(void)
> {
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions
2024-04-03 8:06 ` [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-03 8:59 ` Jeff Layton
@ 2024-04-03 13:20 ` Chuck Lever
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2024-04-03 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker,
Jeff Layton, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, NeilBrown, J. Bruce Fields, Arnd Bergmann,
Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 04:06:37AM -0400, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> There is a warning about unused variables when building with W=1 and no procfs:
>
> net/sunrpc/cache.c:1660:30: error: 'cache_flush_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 1660 | static const struct proc_ops cache_flush_proc_ops = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> net/sunrpc/cache.c:1622:30: error: 'content_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 1622 | static const struct proc_ops content_proc_ops = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> net/sunrpc/cache.c:1598:30: error: 'cache_channel_proc_ops' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-const-variable=]
> 1598 | static const struct proc_ops cache_channel_proc_ops = {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> These are used inside of an #ifdef, so replacing that with an
> IS_ENABLED() check lets the compiler see how they are used while
> still dropping them during dead code elimination.
>
> Fixes: dbf847ecb631 ("knfsd: allow cache_register to return error on failure")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/cache.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> index 95ff74706104..ab3a57965dc0 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
> @@ -1673,12 +1673,14 @@ static void remove_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd)
> }
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
> {
> struct proc_dir_entry *p;
> struct sunrpc_net *sn;
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROC_FS))
> + return 0;
> +
> sn = net_generic(net, sunrpc_net_id);
> cd->procfs = proc_mkdir(cd->name, sn->proc_net_rpc);
> if (cd->procfs == NULL)
> @@ -1706,12 +1708,6 @@ static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
> remove_cache_proc_entries(cd);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> -#else /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */
> -static int create_cache_proc_entries(struct cache_detail *cd, struct net *net)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>
> void __init cache_initialize(void)
> {
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings
2024-04-03 8:06 [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-03 8:06 ` [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions Arnd Bergmann
@ 2024-04-06 5:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-04-10 8:02 ` (subset) " Sebastian Reichel
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-04-06 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-kernel, arnd, mpe, christophe.leroy, dlemoal, jikos, gregkh,
minyard, peterhuewe, jarkko, kristo, sboyd, abbotti, hsweeten,
srinivas.pandruvada, lenb, rafael, john.allen, herbert, vkoul,
ardb, andersson, mdf, liviu.dudau, benjamin.tissoires, andi.shyti,
michael.hennerich, peda, lars, jic23, dmitry.torokhov,
markuss.broks, alexandre.torgue, lee, kuba, Shyam-sundar.S-k,
iyappan, yisen.zhuang, stf_xl, kvalo, sre, tony, broonie,
alexandre.belloni, chenxiang66, martin.petersen, neil.armstrong,
heiko, krzysztof.kozlowski, hvaibhav.linux, elder, jirislaby,
ychuang3, deller, hch, robin.murphy, rostedt, mhiramat, akpm,
keescook, trond.myklebust, anna, masahiroy, nathan, tiwai,
linuxppc-dev, linux-ide, openipmi-developer, linux-integrity,
linux-omap, linux-clk, linux-pm, linux-crypto, dmaengine,
linux-efi, linux-arm-msm, linux-fpga, dri-devel, linux-input,
linux-i2c, linux-iio, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, netdev,
linux-leds, linux-wireless, linux-rtc, linux-scsi, linux-spi,
linux-amlogic, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, greybus-dev,
linux-staging, linux-serial, linux-usb, linux-fbdev, iommu,
linux-trace-kernel, kasan-dev, linux-hardening, linux-nfs,
linux-kbuild, alsa-devel, linux-sound
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:06:18 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Compilers traditionally warn for unused 'static' variables, but not
> if they are constant. The reason here is a custom for C++ programmers
> to define named constants as 'static const' variables in header files
> instead of using macros or enums.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [05/34] 3c515: remove unused 'mtu' variable
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/17b35355c2c6
- [19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions
(no matching commit)
- [26/34] isdn: kcapi: don't build unused procfs code
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/91188544af06
- [28/34] net: xgbe: remove extraneous #ifdef checks
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0ef416e045ad
- [33/34] drivers: remove incorrect of_match_ptr/ACPI_PTR annotations
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings
2024-04-03 8:06 [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-03 8:06 ` [PATCH 19/34] sunrpc: suppress warnings for unused procfs functions Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-06 5:20 ` [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
@ 2024-04-10 8:02 ` Sebastian Reichel
2024-04-22 8:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2025-01-27 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Reichel @ 2024-04-10 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy, Damien Le Moal,
Jiri Kosina, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Corey Minyard, Peter Huewe,
Jarkko Sakkinen, Tero Kristo, Stephen Boyd, Ian Abbott,
H Hartley Sweeten, Srinivas Pandruvada, Len Brown,
Rafael J. Wysocki, John Allen, Herbert Xu, Vinod Koul,
Ard Biesheuvel, Bjorn Andersson, Moritz Fischer, Liviu Dudau,
Benjamin Tissoires, Andi Shyti, Michael Hennerich, Peter Rosin,
Lars-Peter Clausen, Jonathan Cameron, Dmitry Torokhov,
Markuss Broks, Alexandre Torgue, Lee Jones, Jakub Kicinski,
Shyam Sundar S K, Iyappan Subramanian, Yisen Zhuang,
Stanislaw Gruszka, Kalle Valo, Sebastian Reichel, Tony Lindgren,
Mark Brown, Alexandre Belloni, Xiang Chen, Martin K. Petersen,
Neil Armstrong, Heiko Stuebner, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Vaibhav Hiremath, Alex Elder, Jiri Slaby, Jacky Huang,
Helge Deller, Christoph Hellwig, Robin Murphy, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Kees Cook, Trond Myklebust,
Anna Schumaker, Masahiro Yamada, Nathan Chancellor, Takashi Iwai,
linuxppc-dev, linux-ide, openipmi-developer, linux-integrity,
linux-omap, linux-clk, linux-pm, linux-crypto, dmaengine,
linux-efi, linux-arm-msm, linux-fpga, dri-devel, linux-input,
linux-i2c, linux-iio, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, netdev,
linux-leds, linux-wireless, linux-rtc, linux-scsi, linux-spi,
linux-amlogic, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, greybus-dev,
linux-staging, linux-serial, linux-usb, linux-fbdev, iommu,
linux-trace-kernel, kasan-dev, linux-hardening, linux-nfs,
linux-kbuild, alsa-devel, linux-sound
On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 10:06:18 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Compilers traditionally warn for unused 'static' variables, but not
> if they are constant. The reason here is a custom for C++ programmers
> to define named constants as 'static const' variables in header files
> instead of using macros or enums.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[09/34] power: rt9455: hide unused rt9455_boost_voltage_values
commit: 452d8950db3e839aba1bb13bc5378f4bac11fa04
Best regards,
--
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings
2024-04-03 8:06 [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings Arnd Bergmann
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-10 8:02 ` (subset) " Sebastian Reichel
@ 2024-04-22 8:16 ` Michael Ellerman
2025-01-27 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2024-04-22 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy, Damien Le Moal,
Jiri Kosina, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Corey Minyard, Peter Huewe,
Jarkko Sakkinen, Tero Kristo, Stephen Boyd, Ian Abbott,
H Hartley Sweeten, Srinivas Pandruvada, Len Brown,
Rafael J. Wysocki, John Allen, Herbert Xu, Vinod Koul,
Ard Biesheuvel, Bjorn Andersson, Moritz Fischer, Liviu Dudau,
Benjamin Tissoires, Andi Shyti, Michael Hennerich
On Wed, 03 Apr 2024 10:06:18 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Compilers traditionally warn for unused 'static' variables, but not
> if they are constant. The reason here is a custom for C++ programmers
> to define named constants as 'static const' variables in header files
> instead of using macros or enums.
>
> In W=1 builds, we get warnings only static const variables in C
> files, but not in headers, which is a good compromise, but this still
> produces warning output in at least 30 files. These warnings are
> almost all harmless, but also trivial to fix, and there is no
> good reason to warn only about the non-const variables being unused.
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[01/34] powerpc/fsl-soc: hide unused const variable
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/01acaf3aa75e1641442cc23d8fe0a7bb4226efb1
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings
2024-04-03 8:06 [PATCH 00/34] address all -Wunused-const warnings Arnd Bergmann
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-22 8:16 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2025-01-27 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2025-01-27 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, Michael Ellerman, Christophe Leroy,
Damien Le Moal, Jiri Kosina, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Corey Minyard,
Peter Huewe, Jarkko Sakkinen, Tero Kristo, Stephen Boyd,
Ian Abbott, H Hartley Sweeten, Srinivas Pandruvada, Len Brown,
Rafael J. Wysocki, John Allen, Herbert Xu, Vinod Koul,
Ard Biesheuvel, Bjorn Andersson, Moritz Fischer, Liviu Dudau,
Benjamin Tissoires, Andi Shyti, Michael Hennerich, Peter Rosin,
Lars-Peter Clausen, Jonathan Cameron, Dmitry Torokhov,
Markuss Broks, Alexandre Torgue, Lee Jones, Jakub Kicinski,
Shyam Sundar S K, Iyappan Subramanian, Yisen Zhuang,
Stanislaw Gruszka, Kalle Valo, Sebastian Reichel, Tony Lindgren,
Mark Brown, Alexandre Belloni, Xiang Chen, Martin K. Petersen,
Neil Armstrong, Heiko Stuebner, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Vaibhav Hiremath, Alex Elder, Jiri Slaby, Jacky Huang,
Helge Deller, Christoph Hellwig, Robin Murphy, Steven Rostedt,
Masami Hiramatsu, Andrew Morton, Kees Cook, Trond Myklebust,
Anna Schumaker, Masahiro Yamada, Nathan Chancellor, Takashi Iwai,
linuxppc-dev, linux-ide, openipmi-developer, linux-integrity,
linux-omap, linux-clk, linux-pm, linux-crypto, dmaengine,
linux-efi, linux-arm-msm, linux-fpga, dri-devel, linux-input,
linux-i2c, linux-iio, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel, netdev,
linux-leds, linux-wireless, linux-rtc, linux-scsi, linux-spi,
linux-amlogic, linux-rockchip, linux-samsung-soc, greybus-dev,
linux-staging, linux-serial, linux-usb, linux-fbdev, iommu,
linux-trace-kernel, kasan-dev, linux-hardening, linux-nfs,
linux-kbuild, alsa-devel, linux-sound
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 10:06:18AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Compilers traditionally warn for unused 'static' variables, but not
> if they are constant. The reason here is a custom for C++ programmers
> to define named constants as 'static const' variables in header files
> instead of using macros or enums.
>
> In W=1 builds, we get warnings only static const variables in C
> files, but not in headers, which is a good compromise, but this still
> produces warning output in at least 30 files. These warnings are
> almost all harmless, but also trivial to fix, and there is no
> good reason to warn only about the non-const variables being unused.
>
> I've gone through all the files that I found using randconfig and
> allmodconfig builds and created patches to avoid these warnings,
> with the goal of retaining a clean build once the option is enabled
> by default.
>
> Unfortunately, there is one fairly large patch ("drivers: remove
> incorrect of_match_ptr/ACPI_PTR annotations") that touches
> 34 individual drivers that all need the same one-line change.
> If necessary, I can split it up by driver or by subsystem,
> but at least for reviewing I would keep it as one piece for
> the moment.
>
> Please merge the individual patches through subsystem trees.
> I expect that some of these will have to go through multiple
> revisions before they are picked up, so anything that gets
> applied early saves me from resending.
Arnd, can you refresh this one? It seems some misses still...
I have got 3+ 0-day reports against one of the mux drivers.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=adg792a.c
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread