From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com" <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] sunrpc: take a xprt offline using sysfs
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:54:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d2227eb03bd4369d8eda94704e72487b02e5067.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN-5tyGkOQ9wpAXnvo21SWmq=AxT16Ze2WXn1WgUSSmzLCt4AA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 11:06 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 12:16 PM Trond Myklebust
> <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2021-06-03 at 18:59 -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > > From: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
> > >
> > > Using sysfs's xprt_state attribute, mark a particular transport
> > > offline.
> > > It will not be picked during the round-robin selection. It's not
> > > allowed
> > > to take the main (1st created transport associated with the
> > > rpc_client)
> > > offline.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h | 2 ++
> > > net/sunrpc/clnt.c | 1 +
> > > net/sunrpc/sysfs.c | 42
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > --
> > > net/sunrpc/xprtmultipath.c | 3 ++-
> > > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> > > b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> > > index 13a4eaf385cf..72a858f032c7 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
> > > @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ struct rpc_xprt {
> > > struct rcu_head rcu;
> > > const struct xprt_class *xprt_class;
> > > struct rpc_sysfs_xprt *xprt_sysfs;
> > > + bool main; /* marked if it's the 1st
> > > transport */
> > > };
> > >
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_SUNRPC_BACKCHANNEL)
> > > @@ -426,6 +427,7 @@
> > > void xprt_release_write(struct rpc_xprt *,
> > > struct rpc_task *);
> > > #define XPRT_BOUND (4)
> > > #define XPRT_BINDING (5)
> > > #define XPRT_CLOSING (6)
> > > +#define XPRT_OFFLINE (7)
> > > #define XPRT_CONGESTED (9)
> > > #define XPRT_CWND_WAIT (10)
> > > #define XPRT_WRITE_SPACE (11)
> > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> > > index 9bf820bad84c..408618765aa5 100644
> > > --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
> > > @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static struct rpc_clnt * rpc_new_client(const
> > > struct rpc_create_args *args,
> > > }
> > >
> > > rpc_clnt_set_transport(clnt, xprt, timeout);
> > > + xprt->main = true;
> > > xprt_iter_init(&clnt->cl_xpi, xps);
> > > xprt_switch_put(xps);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sysfs.c b/net/sunrpc/sysfs.c
> > > index ec06c9257c07..02c918c5061b 100644
> > > --- a/net/sunrpc/sysfs.c
> > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/sysfs.c
> > > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static ssize_t
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_show(struct
> > > kobject *kobj,
> > > struct rpc_xprt *xprt =
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_kobj_get_xprt(kobj);
> > > ssize_t ret;
> > > int locked, connected, connecting, close_wait, bound,
> > > binding,
> > > - closing, congested, cwnd_wait, write_space;
> > > + closing, congested, cwnd_wait, write_space, offline;
> > >
> > > if (!xprt)
> > > return 0;
> > > @@ -136,8 +136,9 @@ static ssize_t
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_show(struct
> > > kobject *kobj,
> > > congested = test_bit(XPRT_CONGESTED, &xprt-
> > > >state);
> > > cwnd_wait = test_bit(XPRT_CWND_WAIT, &xprt-
> > > >state);
> > > write_space = test_bit(XPRT_WRITE_SPACE, &xprt-
> > > > state);
> > > + offline = test_bit(XPRT_OFFLINE, &xprt->state);
> > >
> > > - ret = sprintf(buf, "state=%s %s %s %s %s %s %s %s
> > > %s
> > > %s\n",
> > > + ret = sprintf(buf, "state=%s %s %s %s %s %s %s %s
> > > %s
> > > %s %s\n",
> > > locked ? "LOCKED" : "",
> > > connected ? "CONNECTED" : "",
> > > connecting ? "CONNECTING" : "",
> > > @@ -147,7 +148,8 @@ static ssize_t
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_show(struct
> > > kobject *kobj,
> > > closing ? "CLOSING" : "",
> > > congested ? "CONGESTED" : "",
> > > cwnd_wait ? "CWND_WAIT" : "",
> > > - write_space ? "WRITE_SPACE" : "");
> > > + write_space ? "WRITE_SPACE" : "",
> > > + offline ? "OFFLINE" : "");
> > > }
> > >
> > > xprt_put(xprt);
> > > @@ -223,6 +225,38 @@ static ssize_t
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_dstaddr_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> > > goto out;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static ssize_t rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_change(struct kobject *kobj,
> > > + struct kobj_attribute
> > > *attr,
> > > + const char *buf,
> > > size_t
> > > count)
> > > +{
> > > + struct rpc_xprt *xprt =
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_kobj_get_xprt(kobj);
> > > + int offline = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (!xprt)
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (!strncmp(buf, "offline", 7))
> > > + offline = 1;
> > > + else
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (wait_on_bit_lock(&xprt->state, XPRT_LOCKED,
> > > TASK_KILLABLE)) {
> > > + count = -EINTR;
> > > + goto out_put;
> > > + }
> > > + if (offline) {
> > > + if (xprt->main)
> > > + count = -EINVAL;
> > > + else
> > > + set_bit(XPRT_OFFLINE, &xprt->state);
> > > + }
> >
> > Is there any way to put the transport back online? What say the
> > problem
> > with the downed IP address gets fixed?
>
> I will add this in v2. Originally the thought was that offlining a
> transport was just a middle step before removing it and not something
> in its own right. I would like to know if it's appropriate to also
> then decrement the xps_nactive counter when the xprt is offline?
>
Yes, that needs to be done. Otherwise the average queue length
calculations in functions like xprt_switch_find_next_entry_roundrobin
will be wrong.
> >
> > > +
> > > + xprt_release_write(xprt, NULL);
> > > +out_put:
> > > + xprt_put(xprt);
> > > + return count;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int rpc_sysfs_init(void)
> > > {
> > > rpc_sunrpc_kset = kset_create_and_add("sunrpc", NULL,
> > > kernel_kobj);
> > > @@ -293,7 +327,7 @@ static struct kobj_attribute
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_info
> > > = __ATTR(xprt_info,
> > > 0444, rpc_sysfs_xprt_info_show, NULL);
> > >
> > > static struct kobj_attribute rpc_sysfs_xprt_change_state =
> > > __ATTR(xprt_state,
> > > - 0644, rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_show, NULL);
> > > + 0644, rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_show,
> > > rpc_sysfs_xprt_state_change);
> > >
> > > static struct attribute *rpc_sysfs_xprt_attrs[] = {
> > > &rpc_sysfs_xprt_dstaddr.attr,
> > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtmultipath.c
> > > b/net/sunrpc/xprtmultipath.c
> > > index 07e76ae1028a..39551b794b80 100644
> > > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtmultipath.c
> > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtmultipath.c
> > > @@ -230,7 +230,8 @@ void xprt_iter_default_rewind(struct
> > > rpc_xprt_iter *xpi)
> > > static
> > > bool xprt_is_active(const struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> > > {
> > > - return kref_read(&xprt->kref) != 0;
> > > + return (kref_read(&xprt->kref) != 0 &&
> > > + !test_bit(XPRT_OFFLINE, &xprt->state));
> > > }
> > >
> > > static
> >
> > --
> > Trond Myklebust
> > Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
> > trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
> >
> >
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 22:59 [PATCH v1 0/3] modify xprt state using sysfs Olga Kornievskaia
2021-06-03 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] sunrpc: take a xprt offline " Olga Kornievskaia
2021-06-13 16:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-15 15:06 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-06-15 15:54 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2021-06-03 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] NFSv4.1 identify and mark RPC tasks that can move between transports Olga Kornievskaia
2021-06-13 16:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-15 15:07 ` Olga Kornievskaia
2021-06-15 15:58 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-06-03 22:59 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] sunrpc: remove an offlined xprt using sysfs Olga Kornievskaia
2021-06-03 23:56 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] modify xprt state " NeilBrown
2021-06-04 0:21 ` Olga Kornievskaia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d2227eb03bd4369d8eda94704e72487b02e5067.camel@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox