Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
To: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
Cc: libtirpc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: LTP: tirpc_rpcb_rmtcall is failing
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 06:18:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ec79840-b34e-bef0-14ec-301829e9e95e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230512074314.GB30010@pevik>

Hello,

On 5/12/23 3:43 AM, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
>> Hello Petr,
> 
>> On 5/4/23 6:16 AM, Petr Vorel wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
> 
>>> tirpc_rpcb_rmtcall is failing. I was able to reproduce it on
>>> * openSUSE Tumbleweed with libtirpc 1.3.3
>>> * Debian stable  11 (bullseye) with libtirpc 1.3.1-1
> 
>>> OTOH SLE 15-SP4 with libtirpc 1.2.6 is working.
> 
>>> PATH="/opt/ltp/testcases/bin:$PATH" rpc_test.sh -s tirpc_svc_4 -c tirpc_rpcb_rmtcall
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: initialize 'lhost' 'ltp_ns_veth2' interface
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: add local addr 10.0.0.2/24
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: add local addr fd00:1:1:1::2/64
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: initialize 'rhost' 'ltp_ns_veth1' interface
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: add remote addr 10.0.0.1/24
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: add remote addr fd00:1:1:1::1/64
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: Network config (local -- remote):
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: ltp_ns_veth2 -- ltp_ns_veth1
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: 10.0.0.2/24 -- 10.0.0.1/24
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: fd00:1:1:1::2/64 -- fd00:1:1:1::1/64
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: timeout per run is 0h 5m 0s
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: check registered RPC with rpcinfo
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: registered RPC:
>>>      program vers proto   port  service
>>>       100000    4   tcp    111  portmapper
>>>       100000    3   tcp    111  portmapper
>>>       100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
>>>       100000    4   udp    111  portmapper
>>>       100000    3   udp    111  portmapper
>>>       100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
>>>       100005    1   udp  20048  mountd
>>>       100005    1   tcp  20048  mountd
>>>       100005    2   udp  20048  mountd
>>>       100005    2   tcp  20048  mountd
>>>       100005    3   udp  20048  mountd
>>>       100005    3   tcp  20048  mountd
>>>       100024    1   udp  37966  status
>>>       100024    1   tcp  43643  status
>>>       100003    3   tcp   2049  nfs
>>>       100003    4   tcp   2049  nfs
>>>       100227    3   tcp   2049  nfs_acl
>>>       100021    1   udp  59603  nlockmgr
>>>       100021    3   udp  59603  nlockmgr
>>>       100021    4   udp  59603  nlockmgr
>>>       100021    1   tcp  39145  nlockmgr
>>>       100021    3   tcp  39145  nlockmgr
>>>       100021    4   tcp  39145  nlockmgr
>>> rpc_test 1 TINFO: using libtirpc: yes
>>> rpc_test 1 TFAIL: tirpc_rpcb_rmtcall 10.0.0.2 536875000 failed unexpectedly
>>> 1
> 
>>> The problem is in tirpc_rpcb_rmtcall.c [1], which calls rpcb_rmtcall(), which
>>> returns 1 (I suppose RPC_CANTENCODEARGS - can't encode arguments - enum
>>> clnt_stat from tirpc/rpc/clnt_stat.h):
> 
>>> 	cs = rpcb_rmtcall(nconf, argc[1], progNum, VERSNUM, PROCNUM,
>>> 			  (xdrproc_t) xdr_int, (char *)&var_snd,
>>> 			  (xdrproc_t) xdr_int, (char *)&var_rec, tv, &svcaddr);
> 
>>> 	test_status = (cs == RPC_SUCCESS) ? 0 : 1;
> 
>>> 	//This last printf gives the result status to the tests suite
>>> 	//normally should be 0: test has passed or 1: test has failed
>>> 	printf("%d\n", test_status);
> 
>>> 	return test_status;
> 
>>> Any idea what could be wrong with these very old tests?
>> No... No idea... but I'm unable to reproduce it. It appears
>> you are using different repo that the one I found on
>> github [1]. But...
> 
> Thanks a lot for looking into the issue.
> BTW on which Fedora/RHEL/CentOS version did you test?
Fedora 38... but I will keep trying...
> 
> No, I'm also using the official LTP repository on github [1].
> And I compile on recent glibc (> 2.32, which removed SUN-RPC) and with libtirpc:
> 
> ./configure
> ...
> libtirpc: yes
> glibc SUN-RPC: no
> 
>> Looking code, RPC_CANTENCODEARGS is returned when
>> there is an xdr problem which might means a
>> memory problem??
> 
>> With that said... commits 21718bbb^..fa153d63 did
> That was released on 1.3.3, but I'm able to reproduce it on
> Debian stable  11 (bullseye) with libtirpc 1.3.1-1.
Good to know... thanks!

steved.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Petr
> 
>> make a lot of changes in the locking and cache
>> management.
> 
>> steved.
> 
>> [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp
> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Petr
> 
>>> [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/12765c115f11026c090ab0ee5dd79b38d95ef31f/testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc/tests_pack/rpc_suite/tirpc/tirpc_expertlevel_rpcb_rmtcall/tirpc_rpcb_rmtcall.c#L91-L93
> 
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2023-05-12 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-04 10:16 LTP: tirpc_rpcb_rmtcall is failing Petr Vorel
2023-05-11 13:15 ` Steve Dickson
2023-05-12  7:43   ` Petr Vorel
2023-05-12 10:18     ` Steve Dickson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3ec79840-b34e-bef0-14ec-301829e9e95e@redhat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=libtirpc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox