Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thanos Chatziathanassiou <tchatzi@arx.gr>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Performance Difference based on .... ?
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:37:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F2CC44.7080104@arx.gr> (raw)

Hello list,

I have come to a dead-end...
How come on a freshly mounted file-system, compiling takes considerably 
less time than on subsequent runs ?
I mean, this snip of shell:
---snip---
for i in 1 2 3
do
time ./apachectl configtest
done
---snip---
2:17.23 on the first run, while it takes
3:21.92 on the second and
3:20.78 on the third run.

The network is 1gb ethernet, with jumbo frames 9000 and tests were run 
both on 4096 and 8192 rsize/wsize with more or less similar results.
Client is 2x AthlonMP 1800+, server is 2x AthlonMP 2200+, kernel on both 
is 2.4.26+Trond's linux-2.4.26.NFS.ALL patch,
mount is udp - essentially so, because this is meant to be a high 
availability setup.
The only real limitation is the rate at which the server can feed data 
to the client, since cpu is 31% on the first and 20% on the second and 
third runs.

Any ideas ? Any other info I can give that might help ?

Regards,
Thanos Chatziathanassiou



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

                 reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F2CC44.7080104@arx.gr \
    --to=tchatzi@arx.gr \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox